Retard wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:49:26 GMT, Jay Santos > wrote:
>
>
>>Even if I were Plato, I couldn't have designed a more
>>excellent foil than "Scented Nectar" to illustrate the
>>ethical bankruptcy of "veganism", and the moral
>>confusion from which it originates.
>>
>>Undeniably, she began by believing that merely by not
>>consuming animal parts, she was causing zero harm to
>
>
> ... farmed

No. The classic "vegan" fallacy is that they cause
zero harm to ANY animals. They all begin by believing
this; the twit pothead is just the most recent to make
it publicly.

>
>
>>animals. This belief IS the classic "vegan" Denying
>>the Antecedent fallacy:
>>
>> If I eat meat, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>>
>> I do not eat meat;
>>
>> therefore, I do not cause animals to suffer and die.
>
>
> No, it isn't.

Yes, it is.

>
>> If I eat meat, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>
>
> This conditional proposition is

True, as "vegans" conceive of meat.