View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Jennifer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The sugar content of the very dark high cocoa content bars is less.

From a Lindt site (Lindt is a great chocolate):

All the bars are 40g servings...

The 85% Cocoa bars have 8g of carbs per serving with 3g of fiber
(thought they are European and may have already subtracted). They have
5g of sugar.
The 70% Cooca bars have 13g of carbs per serving with 2g of fiber. (as
above). They have 11g of sugar.

The "regualar" swiss classic chocolate has 23g of carbs with 1g of fiber
and 22g of sugar.

http://www.globalchocolates.com/Nutrition.htm#4

Jennifer



Alan wrote:

> Sugar is about the only thing in chocolate that has carbs,
> so, either they have about as much carbs as 'regular', or
> they have less carbs. Haven't eyballed an ingredients list
> for those high-percentage chocolates for a long time.
>
>
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 19:19:38 -0700, Jennifer
> > wrote:
>
>
>>They have much fewer carbs.
>>
>>So... don't know if the sugar content is less or not. But they don't
>>have the same as other chocolate.
>>
>>Jennifer
>>
>>
>>Alan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I do believe that those dark chocolates you're talking about
>>>have as much sugar (if not more) than "regular" chocolate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:13:34 -0700, Jennifer
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>There's good news and good news: First... it appears that dark
>>>>chocolate improves blood vessel health.
>>>>
>>>>The other good news is that very very dark chocolate (with a high cocoa
>>>>content - not milk or light or even regular) is very low in carbs!
>>>>
>>>>A bar with 85% cocoa... is very very chocolately... not as creamy as
>>>>Americans usually like, but will satisfy a real choco-holics taste buds.
>>>>And now improve their health. Look for them in the "gourmet" area of
>>>>the grocery. Lindt, Droste and others make them.
>>>>
>>>>Jennifer
>>>>
>>>>Study: Chocolate Improves Vessel Health
>>>>
>>>>August 29, 2004 02:50 PM EDT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>MUNICH, Germany - There's more good news for chocolate lovers.
>>>>Scientists have found that eating dark chocolate appears to improve the
>>>>function of important cells lining the wall of blood vessels for at
>>>>least three hours.
>>>>
>>>>The study, involving 17 healthy young volunteers who agreed to eat a
>>>>bar of dark chocolate and then get an ultrasound, found that eating dark
>>>>chocolate seemed to make the blood vessels more flexible, which helps
>>>>prevent the hardening of the arteries that leads to heart attacks.
>>>>
>>>>But experts cautioned that the weight gain from eating a lot of
>>>>chocolate probably would cancel out the apparent benefit.
>>>>
>>>>Dark chocolate is rich in flavonoids, which act as natural
>>>>antioxidants - chemicals that combat the damage oxygen does to the body.
>>>>However, that does not mean that chocolate binges will ward off a heart
>>>>attack, experts warn.
>>>>
>>>>Cacao, the plant that chocolate comes from, has for centuries been
>>>>used for everything from medicine to currency. Although enjoyed
>>>>worldwide, until recently it was considered a treat that provided fat
>>>>and calories but no substantial nutritional value.
>>>>
>>>>Studies recently have indicated that it releases the happy chemical
>>>>seratonin in the brain.
>>>>
>>>>However, during the last few years, studies have suggested - much to
>>>>the delight of chocoholics - that it is rich in flavonoids.
>>>>
>>>>The latest study, conducted by cardiologists at Athens Medical School
>>>>in Greece, set out to test whether chocolate affected the functioning of
>>>>the so-called endothelial cells in the walls of the blood vessels, which
>>>>are believed to be affected by oxygen damage and are considered a mirror
>>>>of the overall health of the cardiovascular system.
>>>>
>>>>The scientists, who presented their work Sunday at Europe's most
>>>>important cardiology conference, gave 3.5 ounces of either dark,
>>>>bittersweet, chocolate or fake chocolate to 17 healthy volunteers.
>>>>
>>>>On another day, the volunteers were switched. They had no chocolate
>>>>outside of the study, and investigators did not know what each volunteer
>>>>ate during the study.
>>>>
>>>>An ultrasound was taken of each volunteer's upper arm to see the
>>>>functioning of the endothelial cells in the main artery. The cells
>>>>accomplish their goal of controlling the stiffness of the blood vessel
>>>>by secreting several active substances that regulate the flexibility of
>>>>the vessel and influence clot formation.
>>>>
>>>>"During the chocolate session, endothelial function was improved,
>>>>whereas during the placebo day there were no such changes," the study
>>>>concluded. "The favorable effects of dark chocolate lasted for three
>>>>hours at least."
>>>>
>>>>By improving the blood vessel flexibility in apparently healthy
>>>>people, dark chocolate emerges as perhaps a power food, the scientists said.
>>>>
>>>>"At this time, we do not know whether regular intake of dark chocolate
>>>>or other cocoa beverages could result in a reduction of total
>>>>cardiovascular" problems or death, the study said.
>>>>
>>>>Experts warned against gorging on chocolate as a way to ward off heart
>>>>trouble, reminding that excess calories lead to weight gain, which is a
>>>>powerful trigger of heart problems. Any benefit to blood vessel
>>>>flexibility would probably be wiped out by the danger of the weight
>>>>gain, they advised.
>>>>
>>>>Also, while antioxidants in theory help keep the heart healthy and
>>>>looked promising in early research, recent rigorous studies
>>>>investigating whether antioxidant pills such as vitamins A, C and E ward
>>>>off heart attacks have shown them to be useless.
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Michael Gibson, associate chief of cardiology at Harvard
>>>>University-linked Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, said the chocolate
>>>>study was "interesting."
>>>>
>>>>"There are a few basic science reasons why this might be good, but
>>>>keep in mind that antioxidants also improved forearm blood flow but that
>>>>didn't necessarily pan out as an effective treatment," said Gibson, who
>>>>was not associated with the study.
>>>
>>>

>