On Sunday, October 18, 2015 at 3:54:26 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:35:10 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, October 18, 2015 at 3:18:54 PM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2015 4:50 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:35:06 -0400 (EDT), Cheryl
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Wrote in message:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheryl totally different subject - I see under your signature an
> >> >>> Android newsgroup reader, is it purely a reader or can you post from
> >> >>> there too ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> read and post.
> >> >
> >> > On a little bitty screen!! Not as real computer screen like my HP
> >> > Pavillion 27xi!! TWENTY SEVEN INCHES, diagonally!!
> >> >
> >> > John Kuthe...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Funny, my two home computers have a 24" and a 27" screen, but 80% of
> >> what I do is on my 11" Acer netbook. Right now I'm watching TV with my
> >> wife and I'm sitting back in the recliner with the netbook on my belly..
> >> I can also lay in bed with the head up and do the same thing with my
> >> feet under the blanket. Power beds was a great idea. Got them when my
> >> wife had surgery a couple of years ago. Bedroom has a 40" screen and
> >> soundbar.
> >
> >My theory is that people with poor eyesight should be watching movies on small screens instead of big ones. With a small screen, you can put your face right up to the screen and see more than you could with a big screen. The future of TV screens for old folks could be smaller, not larger.
>
> I've got no use for an itty butty screen!! I love as much screen "real
> estate" as I can get!! This 27" diagonal screen is perfect because it
> still fits between the uprights on my computer desk hutch! A bigger
> one would not.
>
>
> John Kuthe...

Just wait until your range of sight is something like 7". Your big screen TV won't save you then! Muuuhahahahahahaaha!