On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 12:35:36 AM UTC+2, santiago wrote:
>
> I don't know if it is France vs California. But I think that wine regions
> in the borders of the wine production limits are normally those with more
> differences between vintages. Alsace, Champagne, Burgundy or Loire have
> more variation between vintages than Languedoc-Roussillon, Bandol or Saint-
> Chinian. Maybe Oregon or Finger Lakes have more variation than California..
>
> Specially Burgundy, with Pinot Noir which is a grape with very thin skins
> and a lot of finesse, is very prone to changes between vintages.
>
> I would not exchange the Drouhin. It might be a nice wine in a ligher (and
> more tart) style. I always prefer to try new things than coming back to a
> wine you already know.
>

But I know both of them now

And Im glad I did, so I learned something about the vintage differences. But I exchanged it, because it is rare they have Cristina and it is the best pinot noir I know of, and I think the Drouhin is way too expensive for tasting almost identical to a 8E argentina pinot noir (Salentein Barrel Selection 2012) - I drank them side by side when I realized it reminded me of that one. I popped one open to check if my memory was correct. Actually, the Salentein was a bit more complex with a bit more tertiary notes.

Its interesting that the two Ladoix from 2012 were fine. However, When I had the 2010 I did seem to get something more out of it as I mentioned in my notes " the 2009 and 2010 are delicious."