On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:00:41 -0800 (PST), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote:

> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 1:29:03 PM UTC-6, sf wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:01:49 -0800, "Pico Rico" >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:02:25 -0800, sf wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I took the meaty bones from the Christmas cross-rib + a subsequent
> > > >> t-bone steak and made beef stock which turned into a very nice
> > > >> (caramelized for an hour) onion soup with cheesy croutons last night.
> > > >> Pictures will be on facebook.
> > > >
> > > > What is a "subsequent t-bone steak"? Is that one of those
> > > > pre-digested steaks?
> > >
> > > the word was spelled correctly, and you still don't get it?
> > >
> >
> > You must forgive him, he's a bit "slow" (shall we say?).
> >
> It was a peculiar word choice, but it was perfectly obvious what you meant.
> >
>
Are you implying that the use of "subsequent" is too hard for him to
digest?


--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room