Dietary ethics
On 11/13/2012 1:52 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>> to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>>
>>>>>> Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>>> snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>>>
>>>> No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>>> is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.
>>
>>> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.
>>
>> You really do have a problem with logic and clear thought,
>> don't you? And also with honesty, considering that you tried
>> to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
>> past "No examples exist". So you're not just an idiot,
>> you're a lying idiot.
>
> I was hoping you could
He's right about you, Goo: you're a lying idiot.
|