Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:04:57 -0600, Jean B. wrote:
>
>> Krypsis wrote:
>>> On 24/10/2012 4:54 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:10:31 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:09:34 -0500, Sqwertz
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I invite you to count the number of times she posts, and the
>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>> times she responds to those you deride her. A normal person
>>>>>>>> would take
>>>>>>>> a hint.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, does that excuse the behavior of folks here? People are
>>>>>>> responsible for their own behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sorry, but Julie is not as innocent as she seems. She's not
>>>>>> exactly respectful of the help people have tried to give her
>>>>>> in the
>>>>>> past. And she still pulls the same crap over and over again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't want to get sucked into this Jean. You haven't read
>>>>>> all the
>>>>>> threads, probably. I know you try and stay away from them. And
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> good reason they're not pretty. Julie simply does not play
>>>>>> well with
>>>>>> others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>> That is why kill files were invented. When you make personal
>>>>> attacks
>>>>> on people you demean yourself more than the person you target.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe in your eyes. But I don't feel demeaned in the least. And you
>>>> can't very well speak for anyone else either - especially
>>>> considering
>>>> the less than respectful following that Julie has here. Apparently
>>>> she's worse in other groups (or so we're led to beleive by several
>>>> other people's comments)
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>> I don't judge people by the comments of others. You would do well
>>> to do likewise!
>>>
>> Having a mind of one's own is an excellent thing!
>
> How was I imposing my feeling on anyone else? I wasn't. You know
> Krypsis, you're one to talk<laugh>. You sure do your share of
> bitching about others here. And if you ever had a well-placed thought
> rather these moments of misplaced run-of-the-mill wisdom, I sure
> haven't seen it.
>
> Then again I don't see your posts unless somebody else quotes it.
> It's extremely rare that somebody would follow up to something you
> said. That should tell you something in itself.
>
> ObFood: Why don't the "Walkers" on 'Walking Dead' eat each other? How
> else could they have survived for 10+ months? It doesn't even appear
> they can drink water with those mangled faces - the brains would have
> died by now. And how did the walkers locked in the prison cells
> survive?
>
> -sw

Uh, I am not Krypsis. Oh, I see, you are replying thtough me.
Carry on.