Krypsis wrote:
> On 24/10/2012 4:54 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:10:31 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:09:34 -0500, Sqwertz
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I invite you to count the number of times she posts, and the
>>>>>> number of
>>>>>> times she responds to those you deride her. A normal person
>>>>>> would take
>>>>>> a hint.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, does that excuse the behavior of folks here? People are
>>>>> responsible for their own behavior.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, but Julie is not as innocent as she seems. She's not
>>>> exactly respectful of the help people have tried to give her
>>>> in the
>>>> past. And she still pulls the same crap over and over again.
>>>>
>>>> You don't want to get sucked into this Jean. You haven't read
>>>> all the
>>>> threads, probably. I know you try and stay away from them. And
>>>> for
>>>> good reason they're not pretty. Julie simply does not play
>>>> well with
>>>> others.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> That is why kill files were invented. When you make personal
>>> attacks
>>> on people you demean yourself more than the person you target.
>>
>> Maybe in your eyes. But I don't feel demeaned in the least. And you
>> can't very well speak for anyone else either - especially
>> considering
>> the less than respectful following that Julie has here. Apparently
>> she's worse in other groups (or so we're led to beleive by several
>> other people's comments)
>>
>> -sw
>>
> I don't judge people by the comments of others. You would do well
> to do likewise!
>
Having a mind of one's own is an excellent thing!