On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> > wrote:
>
> >> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> >>> * * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> >>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> >>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow.. It seems
> >>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> >>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> >>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> >>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> > * * *If so then why does he lie about little things
>
> I don't.
>
> You knew all along that Slater forged the post.



apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?