Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 23-10-2012, 11:36 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,652
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 24-10-2012, 10:32 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 24, 12:36*am, [email protected] wrote:
* * So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 24-10-2012, 08:36 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,652
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:

On Oct 24, 12:36*am, [email protected] wrote:
* * So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 24-10-2012, 09:05 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,258
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:

On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.

You knew all along that Slater forged the post.

  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 25-10-2012, 07:27 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow.. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.

You knew all along that Slater forged the post.




apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 25-10-2012, 09:38 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:









On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 25-10-2012, 09:38 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 24, 9:36*pm, [email protected] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:

On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


What has he lied about?
  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 25-10-2012, 07:05 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:
On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 26-10-2012, 09:59 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:









On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.
  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 26-10-2012, 08:15 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:
On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.



Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 27-10-2012, 12:23 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:









On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery..


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.


Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?
  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 27-10-2012, 09:20 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 27, 5:23*am, Rupert wrote:
On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.


Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?



Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and
a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any
scenario including the one I theorized.
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2012, 03:53 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 27, 9:20*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
On Oct 27, 5:23*am, Rupert wrote:









On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.


Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?


Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and
a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any
scenario including the one I theorized.


Do you think it has a probability greater than 0.01?
  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2012, 04:11 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 29, 9:53*am, Rupert wrote:
On Oct 27, 9:20*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Oct 27, 5:23*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.


Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?


Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and
a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any
scenario including the one I theorized.


Do you think it has a probability greater than 0.01?



Are you a bookie now?;o)
  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2012, 06:12 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,380
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On 29 Okt., 17:11, "Mr.Smartypants" wrote:
On Oct 29, 9:53*am, Rupert wrote:









On Oct 27, 9:20*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 27, 5:23*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert wrote:


On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:


On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton wrote:


On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
wrote:


On Oct 24, 12:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
* * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?


It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.


* * *If so then why does he lie about little things


I don't.


You knew all along that Slater forged the post.


apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
Wussypussy?


Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.


there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
posts when these groups were on Deja News.


Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.


Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.


Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?


Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and
a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any
scenario including the one I theorized.


Do you think it has a probability greater than 0.01?


Are you a bookie now?;o)


I was just curious.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
True Religion Jeans - True Religion Mens Jeans damo General Cooking 0 31-07-2009 11:13 AM
It's so true Bruce Shaw[_2_] General Cooking 4 06-05-2009 03:38 PM
So true Sheldon General Cooking 55 09-04-2006 06:32 PM
Sad but true Vilco General Cooking 49 15-05-2005 06:08 AM
Is this true? Tanya Wine 30 13-09-2004 07:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"

 

Copyright © 2017