On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
wrote:

>On Oct 24, 12:36*am, dh@. wrote:
>> * * So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
>It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.

If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?