"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ozgirl" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "W. Baker" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Julie Bove > wrote:
>>>
>>> : "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
>>> : ...
>>> : > On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>>> : >> In >, "Julie
>>> : >> >
>>> : >> wrote:
>>> : >>
>>> : >>> "Robert > wrote in message
>>> : >>> ...
>>> : >>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes
>>> that I
>>> : >>>> thought you would want to see.
>>> : >>>
>>> : >>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics
>>> have it
>>> : >>> than
>>> : >>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
>>> ungrateful
>>> : >> she is
>>> : >> for any help
>>> : >
>>> : > without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do
>>> with her
>>> : > "i already know it all" approach
>>> : >
>>> : > i give up
>>> : >
>>> : > i've tried
>>> : >
>>> : > and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know
>>> i have
>>> : > already today)
>>> : >
>>> : > but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
>>> Julie,
>>> : > send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
>>>
>>> : I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
>>>
>>> : I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she
>>> put a link
>>> : up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have gastroparesis
>>> than
>>> : originally thought. I know I have it. It has been confirmed
>>> twice by a
>>> : gastroenterologist.
>>>
>>> : I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had
>>> that but
>>> : bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
>>>
>>> : What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
>>>
>>> : Apparently I am missing something.
>>>
>>> : You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
>>>
>>> I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR
>>> SOME
>>> REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my
>>> failure!!!!
>>>
>>> The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not
>>> have put
>>> it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something
>>> like it
>>> was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
>>>
>>> Wendy
>>
>> Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations.
>> If I send an email and get a message back that the message has failed
>> that doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just that the
>> sending didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I don't think
>> Julie meant you any ill will by using the (correct) word.
>
> I didn't and I honestly don't know why everyone is getting so upset.

Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her but
I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy (who did
feel offended). Kiss and make up?