In article <IqWQb.46304$Ar1.5055@fed1read04>, Thomas Curmudgeon >
writes:

>Great notes, but no grade for the Figeac? I wondered because I have some
>and have not tried it.
>

Oops, got up halfway thru typing and commenced at next wine. Figeac should have
read:

2000 Figeac -earth and oak, almost California-ish at first. But some air leads
to a more classic St. Émilion, with earth, red fruit and herbs.B+

Personally, unless I had a lot, I'd hold off for a few years (or decant very
early).

Dale

Dale Williams
Drop "damnspam" to reply