"rick etter" > wrote in message thlink.net>...
> "rick etter" > wrote in message
> thlink.net>...
> > "Ron" > wrote in message
> > om...
> > > "rick etter" > wrote in message
> >...
> > > > "Happy Thoughts" > wrote in message
> > > > ink.net...
> > > > > LizH228 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 1. We would have to clear billions of acres of land, rainforests,
> national
> > > > > > parks, etc., to make room to grow crops.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmmm...you'd think that the cattle and other animals currently
> being
> > > > > raised for their flesh would consume much more of such crops! And
> that
> > > > > once the land being used to support those animals becomes available
> for
> > > > > crops, there'd even be a surplus.
> > > > =====================
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hey fool, there already is a surplus. Plus, cattle need to be fed
> > > > absolutely no mass produced crops.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So there is no need for feedlots, hay crops, feed corn crops?
> > ============================
> > No, there is no absolute need for cattle to be fed any crops. Is that too
> > hard for your feeble brain?
> >
>
>
>
> I bow to your expertise in cow food matters, etter.
> ===============
> You should, loser.
>
>
> Certainly there is no need for cattle to be fed any crops.
> ================
> Exactly. None at all.
>
> There just
> won't be enough cattle to keep all the Mickey D's going around the
> world.
> ======================
> Why? You do realize that here they all start out on pasture, don't you?
> They are all fed grass at the beginning, meaning that there is already the
> pasture there for them.
>
>
> Beef will become a rare and very expensive delicacy like caviar.
> =================
> Nope. Actually, the grass fed beef I eat is even cheaper than I could buy
> regular in stores. Too bad your brainwashing precludes you from the truth,
> eh killer?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> snippage....



You are one deluded fool, petter.



..