Brian Quincy Hutchings wrote:

> is that a consensual approach?
>
> USA vs Lyndon LaRouche: 'He's a Bad Guy, But We Can't Say Why,' ...

No, ****wit. I did say why. He's a paranoid lunatic.

Did you not read what I wrote, top-posting ****wit? A
reporter was questioning him about Larouche's
UNSUPPORTED claim that Queen Elizabeth II is a drug
dealer, and Larouche suddenly exploded that the
reporter himself must be a drug dealer.

Larouche is good at extracting money from stupid fat
****s like you.

Stop top posting, you asswipe.