Thread: Charbroil Red
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
Dave Bugg Dave Bugg is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,622
Default Charbroil Red

HS wrote:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Folks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I was looking into possibly purchasing =
a Charbroil=20
Red, which is the latest thing they offer in their infrared category.=20
I&nbsp;know that last years Charbroil Tec was a disaster, but maybe they =
have=20
gotten it right finally. My question to the group:&nbsp;what might be =
the=20
difference in&nbsp;food taste between the typical open flame grill and =
infrared.=20
Last years model was a hybrid with half the grill being infrared and the =
other=20
half a standard open flame. Charbroil touted it then as the best of both =
worlds.=20
Seems they have abandoned one half of that equation for the 2008 Red.=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;


Try dropping the html, please.
--
Dave
www.davebbq.com