![]() |
Another rest period.
Every so often on here, I just get to a state where I feel the need to
refrain from visiting very often and to have a period of a couple of months, or so, where I am absent from the posting lists. There really are too many repeat queries about the same subject. And too many silly questions where no effort has been made before jumping in at the deep end! Also a lot of questions are asked where the questioner has already made up his/her mind and just wants confirmation -- and rejects any contrary advice given. It continues to be, on the whole, a good group, but I believe that we all need to take a back seat now and again ( especially me -- I find that my fuse timing gets shorter by the week -- and day eventually. Tell Brian Lundeen he is back on my barred list again( I am in the middle of transferring all my data from old to new pc and I am not prepared to listen to him -- just my option -- a history thing -- which nobody need worry about) In my 69th year I feel that I may pander too much to my own whims and opinions occasionally. I am nothing if not self opinionated and that is unlikely to change. So it is time for another "absence". I shall not even look in for a month. There really is a very different flavour to this group now to a year ago. Or I am getting to old. Probably a bit of both BFN -- Trevor A Panther In South Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom. Remove PSANTISPAM to reply |
> There really is a very different flavour to this group now to a year ago.
> Or I am getting to old. Probably a bit of both Trevor - Just some old names gone and new names added. It's still winemaking to me. Bill Frazier Olathe, Kansas USA BTW - the Kansas City area looks better to me than ever (lived here over 60 yrs)...no hurricanes, no earthquakes, no real blizzards...just 4 seasons and lots of sun. |
Hi Trevor,
I know what you mean but it's winemaking time in North America; I appreciated the help I have gotten in the past from this group and return the favor when able. Take care. Joe |
In article >,
William Frazier > writes >Trevor - Just some old names gone and new names added. It's still >winemaking to me. Agreed Bill. This is a most helpful and instructive group with very little of the rancour seen in some Usenet groups. I have learned much in the few weeks I have been here and I intend to continue doing that. -- Alan Gould. North Lincolnshire, UK. |
"William Frazier" > wrote in message ... > BTW - the Kansas City area looks better to me than ever (lived here over > 60 yrs)...no hurricanes, no earthquakes, no real blizzards... Careful, Bill. Saying something like that is just _begging_ for a twister! =>8^O Tom S |
Pinky wrote:
> Every so often on here, I just get to a state where I feel the need to > refrain from visiting very often and to have a period of a couple of > months, or so, where I am absent from the posting lists. There really are > too many repeat queries about the same subject. And too many silly > questions where no effort has been made before jumping in at the deep end! > Also a lot of questions are asked where the questioner has already made up > his/her mind and just wants confirmation -- and rejects any contrary > advice given. > It continues to be, on the whole, a good group, but I believe that we all > need to take a back seat now and again ( especially me -- I find that my > fuse timing gets shorter by the week -- and day eventually. > Tell Brian Lundeen he is back on my barred list again( I am in the middle > of transferring all my data from old to new pc and I am not prepared to > listen > to him -- just my option -- a history thing -- which nobody need worry > about) > In my 69th year I feel that I may pander too much to my own whims and > opinions occasionally. I am nothing if not self opinionated and that is > unlikely to change. > > So it is time for another "absence". I shall not even look in for a month. > > There really is a very different flavour to this group now to a year ago. > Or I am getting to old. Probably a bit of both > > BFN > > Trevor, if you are not learning anything new perhaps you could suggest some subjects that you would like to learn more about. Maybe you can provide that "Spark" that you find missing. |
"Pinky" > wrote in message .uk... > Every so often on here, I just get to a state where I feel the need to > refrain from visiting very often and to have a period of a couple of > months, or so, where I am absent from the posting lists. Hi, Trevor - Enjoy your vacation/rest. Somebody will fill in for you as best as they can. Tom S |
Trevor A Panther wrote:
> There really are too many repeat queries about the same subject. And too many > silly questions where no effort has been made before jumping in at the deep > end! Indeed, this seems a recurring theme. (In fact, it was only a couple of years ago when Trevor brought this up previously - and had a break from the group.) I suppose that's just the way things are here - some people just don't spend the time doing searches or reading the FAQ. But I would say that for the rest of us this frustration has been worth it for the occassional nugget. > There really is a very different flavour to this group now to a year ago. Or > I am getting to old. Probably a bit of both I would agree with that, but then perhaps it is actually more to do with where my winemaking has come to (compared with those who frequent this group) than anything else. Paul E. Lehmann wrote: > if you are not learning anything new perhaps you could suggest some > subjects that you would like to learn more about Fair enough, but often I feel the responses to more unusual questions are not very insightful/knowledgable. That is not meant as a criticism of responsees, just a comment about where people's winemaking is at on a philosophical level and what *kind* of questions are asked. Largely, the frequenters of this group share some broad-ranging cross-over areas, yet tend to never explore certain others. I think that's more a matter of luck with UseNet. Ben |
|
To tell you the truth I'm pretty sure no one is maintaining it now, but
here is Dons original link. http://www.malak.ca/rcw.faq Joe |
Joe Sallustio wrote:
> To tell you the truth I'm pretty sure no one is maintaining it now, but > here is Dons original link. > > http://www.malak.ca/rcw.faq > > Joe One think I really enjoy about this newsgroup is the LACK of replies stating read the f...... FAQ, as..... This is the typical response one finds on computer language newsgroups, operating systems newsgroups etc but so far, fortunately, this is NOT the predominant response on this newsgroup. For those willing to help newcomers, I applaud, even if it means that some more knowledgeage may find the answers boring and repetitive. I have been surprised, however, that even though I know the answer a "Newbie" may ask, the responses often shed new light on issues or related issues that would not be covered by just reading the f...... FAQs and I myself sometimes learn something new or reconsider some things I THOUGHT i knew or understood. |
I agree with Paul. I do not really care for the groups that maintain FAQ's
and expect people to go to them. They tend to develop into experts only groups that come across as being a bit snooty. New winemakers do not understand that their question is just subtlety different from someone else's. They think it is really different. I would rather the group help everyone in real time. I like Trevor and enjoy his posts but I differ with him on this topic. I also agree with Paul that maybe those of us that have been around a long time should be posting some issues for discussion that are beyond the basics. It would keep the group from going stale. Ray "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote in message ... > Joe Sallustio wrote: > >> To tell you the truth I'm pretty sure no one is maintaining it now, but >> here is Dons original link. >> >> http://www.malak.ca/rcw.faq >> >> Joe > > One think I really enjoy about this newsgroup is the LACK of replies > stating > read the f...... FAQ, as..... > > This is the typical response one finds on computer language newsgroups, > operating systems newsgroups etc but so far, fortunately, this is NOT the > predominant response on this newsgroup. > > For those willing to help newcomers, I applaud, even if it means that some > more knowledgeage may find the answers boring and repetitive. I have been > surprised, however, that even though I know the answer a "Newbie" may ask, > the responses often shed new light on issues or related issues that would > not be covered by just reading the f...... FAQs and I myself sometimes > learn something new or reconsider some things I THOUGHT i knew or > understood. |
You know, i will throw my hat in, becasue I am most likely the one that
answers new users/redundtant/basic/faq covered questions. My response is.... Why not? It is not like there is an excessive amount of scroll here. There are only a couple of posts a day, even if you only check in once a week that is not all that much to read....and you can skip anything you do not find interesting. On the other hand, just by answering the questions as they get asked, it allows for users to get relatively quick current opinions on a subject, even one as basic as sanitation. The roll call of current readers changes frequently, as people learn enough they stop reading the group. It happens. I would not let the threat of someone not reading detract from the dozens of people that do read it. It is a public group, lets not make it a stale elietist only group that never has anything new or interested poisted. |
Quote....(Indeed, this seems a recurring theme. (In fact, it was only a
couple of years ago when Trevor brought this up previously - and had a break from the group.) I suppose that's just the way things are here - some people just don't spend the time doing searches or reading the FAQ}......end Quote Hi ...just a thought here but the internet is such a time suck at the best of times why should we spend hours searching page after page of search results??....should we now feel guilty about repeating an question that was asked a few months or even a few years ago?...I think not ....I for one will ask away Jose.....andy j |
A "newbie perspective".
I always try to title my queries with a "newbie" category when possible. My experience in this group has been totally positive to date. I also have always received timely relevant feedback to my queries. I believe my first batch of fresh fruit wine will likely be a success and in no small part to the valuable feedback I received from members of this group. Perhaps there are too many "How do I ??" and not enough thank you very much. So,,, thank you very much. |
You want elitist? check out alt.food.wine now THAT's elitist. You gotta wear
a bullet proof vest to voice a contrary opinion on that group. It blows me that so many who merely taste the wine have so much more to critisize about it than those of us (even at the most basic level) who endure the rainy summers, hail, mold and frost of grape growing, and then struggle with stuck fermentations and wrong pH and and hydrogen sulfide and acidity of vinification. This group can't get elitist. Anyone who has had to dump liters of spoiled wine, and then hand a 400 dollar barrel to his wife as a flower pot because the bacteria makes it useless for anything else will tell you grape growing and winemaking is too much of a humiliating experience to allow elitism. Let the questions come, simple or complex. If you've got the passion there is no such thing as a stupid question. Even the basic ones. That's what makes this community so cool. To coin the expression of my next door neighbour: "dare to fail". That's an invitation. The beauty of it is, when you can ask any question about wine or grapes (or fruit) without embarrassment and get a decent answer that enhances both your dignity and your batch. Jeff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter