Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

No one apparently. Why do you think people are going to be attracted
to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
deleting spam posts. Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.

This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. What
makes you think that people are going to want to visit?

Signed,

Another disappointed wine maker

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. Now everyone uses:

http://www.winepress.us/


"Joel" > wrote in message
...
> No one apparently. Why do you think people are going to be attracted
> to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
> deleting spam posts. Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
> spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.
>
> This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
> the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. What
> makes you think that people are going to want to visit?
>
> Signed,
>
> Another disappointed wine maker

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

Joel > writes:

> No one apparently. Why do you think people are going to be attracted
> to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
> deleting spam posts. Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
> spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.
>
> This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
> the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. What
> makes you think that people are going to want to visit?

Do you not understand the concept of unmoderated newsgroups? I read it
through eternal-september.org; the volume is low, but I don't think I've
encountered any spam.
--
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

On Sep 6, 9:18*am, "frederick ploegman" > wrote:
> Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. *Now everyone uses:
>
> http://www.winepress.us/
>
> "Joel" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > No one apparently. *Why do you think people are going to be attracted
> > to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
> > deleting spam posts. *Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
> > spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.
>
> > This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
> > the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. *What
> > makes you think that people are going to want to visit?
>
> > Signed,
>
> > * *Another disappointed wine maker- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

And I just tried to go to this address & nothing showed...

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

It's down right now. Try again in three or four hours...


"Ann Bartholomew" > wrote in message
...
On Sep 6, 9:18 am, "frederick ploegman" > wrote:
> Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. Now everyone uses:
>
> http://www.winepress.us/
>
> "Joel" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > No one apparently. Why do you think people are going to be attracted
> > to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
> > deleting spam posts. Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
> > spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.
>
> > This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
> > the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. What
> > makes you think that people are going to want to visit?
>
> > Signed,
>
> > Another disappointed wine maker- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

And I just tried to go to this address & nothing showed...

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

On 9/6/2010 8:18 AM, frederick ploegman wrote:
> Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. Now everyone uses:
>
> http://www.winepress.us/
>

Not *everyone* ... there is also

http://www.winemakingtalk.com/forum/index.php

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

"BobF" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/6/2010 8:18 AM, frederick ploegman wrote:
>> Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. Now everyone uses:
>>
>> http://www.winepress.us/
>>
>
> Not *everyone* ... there is also
>
> http://www.winemakingtalk.com/forum/index.php


Some of the same people posting. But I like the map !!

Who on this site is responsible for weeding out spam?
 

"frederick ploegman" > wrote in message
...
> It's down right now. Try again in three or four hours...
>
>
> "Ann Bartholomew" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 6, 9:18 am, "frederick ploegman" > wrote:
>> Back in the day, this was a wonderful site. Now everyone uses:
>>
>> http://www.winepress.us/
>>
>> "Joel" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> > No one apparently. Why do you think people are going to be attracted
>> > to your group if you don't make an effort to block out spam or
>> > deleting spam posts. Of the most recent posts, I counted at least 60
>> > spam on the first 8 or 9 pages alone.
>>
>> > This group is kinda like the ugliest house on the block, the one with
>> > the lawn never mowed, and covered up with weeds 6 feet tall. What
>> > makes you think that people are going to want to visit?
>>
>> > Signed,
>>
>> > Another disappointed wine maker- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> And I just tried to go to this address & nothing showed...
>

Ann and frederick - the site works OK for me, today anyway. Maybe it was
down at the time you looked.

someone