Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Form is fine for email responses, but I was referring to company address and
phone number. A lot of people like to call and talk to humans as well as know where the company they are buying from is located. "Clyde Gill" > wrote in message m... > Adam: Your preference for no forms comes off as rather odd to me, and > is not consistant with my experience with websites. I'm curious as to > why you're so against it? Once a contact form was added to our winery > site, response was well over tenfold from the old "mailto:" link, > which btw will not work with some browsers (ie. Linx). The main > reasons behind using this type of form stems from two other benefits: > > First, spambots cannot reach my email, which is very important when > trying to conduct business online. Spam generated from displaying on > the web can become phenomenal (literally hunderds a day), and spam > screeners are imperfect. I actually received one "manual spam" that > was complaining that they could not find my email! > > Second, the information supplied by a form is dumped into a database > where it can be both stored properly/automatically, and then retrieved > easily. > > Of course, none of this is important if it turns customers away, but I > have to wonder how prevalent your viewpoint relative to the rest of > the public?! > > The intent is to add the phone number and mailing address to the pages > once this is taken to the "live" stage. > > Once into the online order system, there's a drop down menu for > "state". Selecting "Missouri" will add sales tax to the order. Your > reminder will help me to remember to put it on the mail-in forms! > Payment of all orders is processed by hand, so if someone skips this > step using either method it can be dealt with later. > > A video addition is an interesting idea..... something I'll look into. > That'll require a model, which means interviews..... I like this > idea!! It strikes me as odd that I didn't think of this. (kT, looking > over my shoulder, is not to hot on the idea of a model pushing my > buttons) As mentioned in the original post, my thinking was to display > it live at trade shows, but it is really so simple to use that there's > not much to demonstrate. It will require an electrican to install, > but after that, it's basically "plug and play". In other words, you > plug the pump into the unit, turn the power switch on, and the remote > becomes 'live'. |