I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came across an
old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken bottles.
One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no label
remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass: "Federal
law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also embossed:
"4/5 Quart."

Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
bottle?

Bart

Who knows, there's a lot of old strange laws on the books.
Hope not.
Against recycling?
Logical government - an oxymoron.
;0)
Darlene

"bwesley7" > wrote in message
news:kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06...
> I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
> occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came across
an
> old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken bottles.
> One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no
label
> remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass:
"Federal
> law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also
embossed:
> "4/5 Quart."
>
> Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
> bottle?
>
> Bart
>
>
>
>

In article <kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06>, "bwesley7" > wrote:
>I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
>occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came across an
>old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken bottles.
>One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no label
>remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass: "Federal
>law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also embossed:
>"4/5 Quart."
>
>Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
>bottle?
>
Not AFAIK. But reuse of bottles that originally held distilled spirits is not
permitted.

Go go google again

http://www.antique-bottles.net/forum.../m_5539/tm.htm

--

---
Let us not then pursue
By force impossible, by leave obtained
Unacceptable, though in Heav'n, our state
Of splendid vassalage, but rather seek
Our own good from ourselves, and from our own
Live to ourselves, though in this vast recess,
Free, and to none accountable, preferring
Hard liberty before the easy yoke
Of servile pomp.
- Mammon, Paradise Lost
"bwesley7" > wrote in message
news:kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06...
> I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
> occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came across
an
> old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken bottles.
> One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no
label
> remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass:
"Federal
> law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also
embossed:
> "4/5 Quart."
>
> Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
> bottle?
>
> Bart
>
>
>
>

Thanks for the link -- good answer!


"Adam Lang" > wrote in message
...
> Go go google again
>
> http://www.antique-bottles.net/forum.../m_5539/tm.htm
>
> --
>
> ---
> Let us not then pursue
> By force impossible, by leave obtained
> Unacceptable, though in Heav'n, our state
> Of splendid vassalage, but rather seek
> Our own good from ourselves, and from our own
> Live to ourselves, though in this vast recess,
> Free, and to none accountable, preferring
> Hard liberty before the easy yoke
> Of servile pomp.
> - Mammon, Paradise Lost
> "bwesley7" > wrote in message
> news:kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06...
> > I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
> > occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came
across
> an
> > old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken
bottles.
> > One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no
> label
> > remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass:
> "Federal
> > law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also
> embossed:
> > "4/5 Quart."
> >
> > Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
> > bottle?
> >
> > Bart
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

If they want you, they can get you. Here in Texas it is illegal to carry a
pair of pliers in the trunk of your car. (From the fence cutting war days)
and they use that law when they need to get someone. It is legal for you to
make wine to be consumed at your own table but it is illegal for you to give
a bottle to a friend or consume it at his table. (There are provisions for
wine contests.) I suspect that most of us break some of those laws. Not me
off course but most of us.

Ray
"bwesley7" > wrote in message
news:kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06...
> I'm part owner of a tract of undeveloped acreage (~22 acres), and
> occasionally take a walk through the woods. This afternoon, I came across
an
> old junk pile, consisting mostly of a few rusted cans and broken bottles.
> One of those bottles was apparently an old liquor bottle, screwtop, no
label
> remaining, but with the following embossed (raised?) on the glass:
"Federal
> law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also
embossed:
> "4/5 Quart."
>
> Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
> bottle?
>
> Bart
>
>
>
>

> "bwesley7" > wrote in message
> news:kQelc.3300$nN6.2773@lakeread06...
> "Federal
> > law forbids sale or reuse of this bottle." At the bottom was also
> embossed:
> > "4/5 Quart."
> >
> > Is there some federal statute that we violate every time we reuse a wine
> > bottle?
> >

I think that's a hold over from the days when there were returnable
bottles and reusable bottles. Returnable had a deposit on them but
could not be refilled, the glass could be recycled and the bottle
re-made. Reusable had (usually) a higher deposit and could be refilled
with out remaking the bottle.

I don't know of anyone that uses reusable bottles anymore. It costs
too much to make the original bottle (they had to be thicker) and to
handle all of the regulations about cleaning and sanitizing. It's
cheeper just to remake the bottle.

Andy

JEP wrote:

> I don't know of anyone that uses reusable bottles anymore. It costs
> too much to make the original bottle (they had to be thicker) and to
> handle all of the regulations about cleaning and sanitizing. It's
> cheeper just to remake the bottle.

Almost all domestic beer in Ontario is packaged in returnable, reusable
bottles...

--
charles
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
"I certainly do not drink all the time. I have to sleep you know."
- W.C. Fields

Charles H > wrote in message >...
>
> Almost all domestic beer in Ontario is packaged in returnable, reusable
> bottles...

Sorry, I should have specified in the US.

Andy

In article >,
JEP > wrote:
>Charles H > wrote in message
>...

>> Almost all domestic beer in Ontario is packaged in returnable, reusable
>> bottles...

>Sorry, I should have specified in the US.

Coors, Bud, Miller . . . the cases of reusable are certainly still sold
out here. They come in a heavier, apparently reusable, waxy case, and
are heavy longneck bottles. They cost a bit more to leave the
distributor with, but you can bring them back for the deposit.

The one time I did this (for a meeting, not myself) I noticed that many
of the bottles showed visible wear.

hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
111 Hiller (814) 375-4846 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of X and postings.
Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \

JEP wrote:

> Charles H > wrote in message
> >...
> >
> > Almost all domestic beer in Ontario is packaged in returnable, reusable
> > bottles...
>
> Sorry, I should have specified in the US.

I wasn't trying to be facetious, just sayin' for general interest's
sake.

--
charles
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
"I certainly do not drink all the time. I have to sleep you know."
- W.C. Fields