Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just bottled on the Limited Edition Cellar Craft wines that give you
16L of juice/concentrate and a pack that has all the skins and seeds and stems in the kit. It is a red Malec/Merlot kit. I had some friends making the wine with me and we were tasting it throught the process. After tasting it when after finings we found it to be very rich and full bodied. After filtering and bottling, we found that it was no longer like that. It seems to have lost some of it's body and richness after filtering. Would it have been better to have not filtered? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Rob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect that a lot of the bouquet and some of the body will come back
after a month in bottle. It is probably still experiencing bottle shock. I don't filter my wine but I would not think that it would cause the drastic effect you are describing. But if you fined it, why would you filter it? It should have cleared with the fining and the filtering could then remove nothing but things that should have been left in. Ray "Rob M" > wrote in message om... > I just bottled on the Limited Edition Cellar Craft wines that give you > 16L of juice/concentrate and a pack that has all the skins and seeds > and stems in the kit. It is a red Malec/Merlot kit. > > I had some friends making the wine with me and we were tasting it > throught the process. After tasting it when after finings we found it > to be very rich and full bodied. After filtering and bottling, we > found that it was no longer like that. It seems to have lost some of > it's body and richness after filtering. > > Would it have been better to have not filtered? Any suggestions would > be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Rob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rob M" > wrote in message om... > I just bottled on the Limited Edition Cellar Craft wines that give you > 16L of juice/concentrate and a pack that has all the skins and seeds > and stems in the kit. It is a red Malec/Merlot kit. > > I had some friends making the wine with me and we were tasting it > throught the process. After tasting it when after finings we found it > to be very rich and full bodied. After filtering and bottling, we > found that it was no longer like that. It seems to have lost some of > it's body and richness after filtering. > > Would it have been better to have not filtered? Any suggestions would > be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Rob Hi Rob, Wine is oxidized during bottling. Oxidation makes wine taste flat and this condition is called "bottle sickness." Bottle sickness is temporary, and the wine will recover in a few weeks if the proper amount of sulfur dioxide was used before bottling. In general, filtration will not significantly change a wines character. Of course, wine can also be oxidized by a faulty filtration procedure, and badly filtered wine will exhibit bottle sickness. lum |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray wrote:
> I suspect that a lot of the bouquet and some of the body will come back > after a month in bottle. It is probably still experiencing bottle shock. > I don't filter my wine but I would not think that it would cause the > drastic > effect you are describing. But if you fined it, why would you filter it? > It should have cleared with the fining and the filtering could then remove > nothing but things that should have been left in. > > Ray I believe filtering is sometimes done to remove or diminish the chances of malo lactic or regular refermention in cases where possibly all the sugar has not been fermented out - or to sweeten a wine and not add sorbate. If fine filtering can eliminate yeast cells, what else can it eliminate? Don't know, just asking. I have tasted red wine that was filtered and to me, it did have a negative impact but could just be my imagination. > > "Rob M" > wrote in m1.075essage > om... >> I just bottled on the Limited Edition Cellar Craft wines that give you >> 16L of juice/concentrate and a pack that has all the skins and seeds >> and stems in the kit. It is a red Malec/Merlot kit. >> >> I had some friends making the wine with me and we were tasting it >> throught the process. After tasting it when after finings we found it >> to be very rich and full bodied. After filtering and bottling, we >> found that it was no longer like that. It seems to have lost some of >> it's body and richness after filtering. >> >> Would it have been better to have not filtered? Any suggestions would >> be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rob M" > wrote in message om... > I just bottled on the Limited Edition Cellar Craft wines that give you > 16L of juice/concentrate and a pack that has all the skins and seeds > and stems in the kit. It is a red Malec/Merlot kit. > > I had some friends making the wine with me and we were tasting it > throught the process. After tasting it when after finings we found it > to be very rich and full bodied. After filtering and bottling, we > found that it was no longer like that. It seems to have lost some of > it's body and richness after filtering. > > Would it have been better to have not filtered? If the wine is biologically stable and clear there isn't any good reason to filter it. I used to routinely filter all my wines, but over the years I've come to realize that it's better not to if you can avoid it. The wine suffers from the extra handling, if nothing else. Of course if you have residual sugar, cloudy wine or incomplete ML it's risky to _not_ filter. Tom S |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|