On 11/18/03 11:16 AM, in article
, "Barry"
> wrote:

> I'm a budding home winemaker.
>
> Getting a good S.G. reading that I can trust after the cap falls, and
> settling starts is pretty easy.
>
> I'd like to know what procedures people use to do the initial reading.
> There are so many solids in the fresh must, even using the juice I
> get through a straining bag (especially if some non-grape fruits are
> used)... my level of confidence in the readings I get at the beginning
> is pretty low.
>
> I did a Toka plum wine which started at like 1.130 when the must did
> not seem overly sweet to the taste. I don't believe the reading.
>
> How do you guys deal with this?

I have checked a number of my musts that had a lot of fruit solids and
compared simply straining it with a coarse wire mesh strainer and filtering
through good paper filters. I found no discernable difference in the
hydrometer readings if I was careful to make sure I bounced it up and down
to make sure it was not solid viscosity floating the hydrometer. Therefore,
I usually just push a kitchen strainer down into the must and scoop up some
of the pretty clear juice. All of this is ballpark anyway, so if there's
enough sugar to float it up near 1.095, I'm happy.

--
Greg Cook
http://homepage.mac.com/gregcook/Wine

(remove spamblocker from my email)

I agree with Greg. I have not found that suspended solids in must are that
important to measuring SG. That is the suspended solids that we can see.
Unless they are so thick that they impede the movement of the hydrometer,
they are not going to effect the reading. After all, they are "suspended"
solids meaning they have very little buoyancy and should not effect it. The
solids that Action and Duncan and UCLA are correcting for are those that
start out in the must and end up there after fermentation as well. They
effect the buoyancy of the fluid at both ends and consequently they are not
a large effect. But I correct for them anyway. ;o)

Ray

"Greg Cook" > wrote in message
...
> On 11/18/03 11:16 AM, in article
> , "Barry"
> > wrote:
>
> > I'm a budding home winemaker.
> >
> > Getting a good S.G. reading that I can trust after the cap falls, and
> > settling starts is pretty easy.
> >
> > I'd like to know what procedures people use to do the initial reading.
> > There are so many solids in the fresh must, even using the juice I
> > get through a straining bag (especially if some non-grape fruits are
> > used)... my level of confidence in the readings I get at the beginning
> > is pretty low.
> >
> > I did a Toka plum wine which started at like 1.130 when the must did
> > not seem overly sweet to the taste. I don't believe the reading.
> >
> > How do you guys deal with this?
>
> I have checked a number of my musts that had a lot of fruit solids and
> compared simply straining it with a coarse wire mesh strainer and
filtering
> through good paper filters. I found no discernable difference in the
> hydrometer readings if I was careful to make sure I bounced it up and down
> to make sure it was not solid viscosity floating the hydrometer.
Therefore,
> I usually just push a kitchen strainer down into the must and scoop up
some
> of the pretty clear juice. All of this is ballpark anyway, so if there's
> enough sugar to float it up near 1.095, I'm happy.
>
> --
> Greg Cook
> http://homepage.mac.com/gregcook/Wine
>
> (remove spamblocker from my email)
>

I've been relying more on refractometer readings in new must. It seems more
accurate.

The other factor that I've found that affects the hydrometer readings is the
simple thickness of the hydrometer and the fact that it seems to stick to the
walls of the cylinder that I use to collect the sample. I'd love to find a
thinner hydrometer.

Lee

My experience differs from Greg's and Ray's. I have noticed
significant differences in SG readings in musts with suspended solids
(up to 30 gravity points). Perhaps I am dealing with less diluted
musts (thus higher levels of SS) or my straining methods are less
effective. In any case, if winemakers want a reaosnable degree of
accuracy in their SG reading I think it is important to check that the
straining/reading procedures do provide it.

Ben

On 11/23/03 6:13 PM, in article
, "Ben Rotter"
> wrote:

> My experience differs from Greg's and Ray's. I have noticed
> significant differences in SG readings in musts with suspended solids
> (up to 30 gravity points). Perhaps I am dealing with less diluted
> musts (thus higher levels of SS) or my straining methods are less
> effective. In any case, if winemakers want a reaosnable degree of
> accuracy in their SG reading I think it is important to check that the
> straining/reading procedures do provide it.
>
> Ben


Hmm, the only time I have problems in different readings are when the solids
make the solution very viscous and the hydrometer does not float properly.
That usually occurs in the higher concentrated fruit musts. For these I
always at least coarse strain and if still viscous (the hydrometer doesn't
really bounce when tapped) I will filter through a coffee filter.

--
Greg Cook
http://homepage.mac.com/gregcook/Wine

(remove spamblocker from my email)