Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lawrence Leichtman states in part:
"I guess everyone has really missed my point in posting this article. I have been drinking and tasting Bourdeaux wines since the "60's. I'm quite familiar with cellaring Bourdeaux as well as the fact that many are quite closed young. That being said, you can also see the aging potential immediately. Often still in the cask though I've never been privy to that. From the 1998 vintage onward my tastings of first growths have not produced anything I would be overwhelmed with in terms of QPR. Many Bourdeaux's seem to increasing in price while dropping in quality. My percentage of corked wines from France now approaches 15% since 1990 vintages though the price does not reflect the lesser quality of some wines and the dismal state of corkage in France. Over the last 2 years I've lost about 40 bad bottles of French wines from Bourdeaux. Burgundy, Rhone to a total of $1900. " I too have cellared wines since the 60s. The last wines I bought for long keeping were Haut Brion 89, Margaux 90, and a mixed case of DRC 90. Thus I have no experience with more recent French wines other than a few whites and simple wines for everyday drinking. From your reports, those of Michael Pronay, etc., I must conclude that the percentage of corked French wines has increased since perhaps the late 80s to mid 90s. I have not had many corked wines from my older wines, which are stored under ideal conditions. However I well remember a badly corked 70 DRC Echezeaux. When I was buying many of my wines in the early 70s, the spread in price between better Bordeaux second and lower growths and first growths was not nearly as great as now, with a first growth costing 2 to 3 times as much as a very good second growth. The same applied for Burgundy. I just received a price list of 2003 Bordeaux en premier. You may have a single bottle of Petrus for US$ 1999.99. Lafite is a relative bargin at $374.99. Lynch Bages is $66.99. In the early 70's( just after the crash in the wine market) a very good recent Lynch Bages would have been well under $10, a Lafite about $22, and a Petrus about $35. I would be very upset if I paid the fortune that new first growths now cost, only to find the bottle corked or the wine not built to age when opened perhaps 20 to 30 years from now. Besides a very few corked bottles, I have had a few bottles showing random oxidation because of cork physical flaws, and a very few wines that just were not well made. I do not plan to buy any more recent top wines because of the cost, the reported cork problems, and because, if the wines are very good anymore, top ones would need 20 to 30 years to fully mature and I likely would be dead by then or too old to enjoy them. I do find some wines very difficult to evaluate when young, with Mouton perhaps being the most dfficult - or at least it was when the old Baron was still alive. It was sort of like a high wire act. If it makes it to the end correctly, it can be outstanding. However if something becomes just a bit out of balance, it can come crashing to the ground. Still the Mouton 45 may be the greatest Bordeaux made since WW II. However in many other years that are good in general, Mouton has not been as good as it should have been for the year. Reply to . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail? | Winemaking | |||
Very interesting sushi article in today's Wall St. Journal | Sushi | |||
Moi in the Wall Street Journal | General Cooking | |||
Moi in the Wall Street Journal | General Cooking | |||
from today's Wall Street Journal Opinion Page | Wine |