Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[Posted and mailed]
It is often suggested that French wine would sell better and be much more easily understood if the labels of AoC wines bore a reference to their constituent varietals. The French say that this ignores the over-riding importance of terroir. I have always thought the latter view to be right. To say that a St. Emilion is merlot, bouchet and cabernet sauvignon is only a tiny, tiny, part of the story — take the Corbin and Figeac groups, close as they are geographically, without even considering the differnce between those wines and those of the low lying vineyards around St. Sulpice & St. Pey. That could be said to be explained by the relative importance of the proportions of each and of the wine maker‘s influence although I would still argue when you look at those who have different chateaux in different places that terroir is vitally important. Look at the difference between the Nieppberg chateaux or Ch.Chante Alouette Cormeille and Ch. Gueyrosse for example. The reality of the argument has perhaps to be tested with unblended wines and this was brought home to me last week in a tasting of over 30 different Burgundies. It might be thought that more useful information, and greater consistency, would be derived from a wine label which showed only one cépage to have been used so that it was possible to have the attachment of a single, pure, unblended, varietal label, in Burgundy, of either Chardonnay or Pinot Noir. However tasting three different climats of Dom. Coste-Caumartin‘s wonderful Premier Cru Pommards, both vertically and horizontally, though several vintages, was a clear demonstration, yet again, of the immense difference that a few hundred yards can and does make, even when the same winemaker is responsible for each of the wines under consideration. Why do apparently knowledgeable people continue to press for varietal labelling which may be appropriate for nations or areas producing one or two dimensional wines or those blended from many hundreds of acres but which would deny the subtlety and interst of the great wines of France? Can somebody please enlighten me? Tim Hartley |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wine labelling | Wine | |||
New wine varietal just for seniors | General Cooking | |||
Yunnan black tea varietal = Darjeeling varietal? | Tea | |||
Purpose of a Wine Cellar | Wine | |||
Capitalization of Wine Varietal Names | Wine |