Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The annual long week-end is a social wine-tasting and partying event, from
Friday morning at the Vinothek in Bernkastel to the Sunday evening Auslese test in Erden :-) I got around to tasting some 140-150 wines (no spitting...) and the final outcome is that 2003 is a vintage worth buying. Certainly, a number of wines showed low acidity but most were very balanced anyway and vintners claimed they would keep for many years. Uniformly, the hot year showed through in high sugar readings and good color (meaning well extracted wines). A few of the usual good performers didn't quite live up to expectations and were superseded, this time, by young upstarts fresh from school taking over their fathers' operations. These guys seemed to have learned something about wine making that the elders didn't know! Whatever they've done (and only one admitted to having added a very small amount of acid) the wines were delicious and lively - even with a hint of spritzyness from carbon dioxide which one vintner said was done deliberately to further the impression of a wine having a higher level of acidity. What to choose? It might be worth looking for outlying vineyards, like Veldenzer Kirchberg, with soils keeping higher levels of humidity. A top site like the Brauneberger Juffer might show less well because of too little water for the vines in 2003. However, we found, as usual, that the vintner still is the most important part of the equation. Elder vintners compared this vintage to 1975 and 1976, even 1983 without a common agreement as to why and how. I agree that there are several points of resemblance, but my personal impression is that the making of wines is far advanced today compared to these times and the wines thus better now than these were. All things taken together, my choice was with the halbtrocken (semidry) Spätleses and the dry Q.b.A's of 12.5-13+% a.b.v. (Ausleses in reality), but there were some very fine top traditional wines. An Auslese with 137Oechsle, a B.A. with 175 and a T.B.A with 220Oechsle were all very, very good. I did have a few sugar bombs, however, so there's reason to be cautious with these superripe wines. The ranking of this vintage, very subjectively, would be something behind 2001 but ahead of 2002. Future is hard to judge, but the best will surely keep five to ten years. As to 2004 all were praying for sunshine and no rain the next 10 days, but, alas, that may not be the case. We'll see. Anders |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Length of Thread and Signal to Noise? | General Cooking | |||
Reuter's Health reporting about BBQ.. | Barbecue | |||
Newbie question about secondary length | Winemaking | |||
laptop reporting process for food | General Cooking | |||
laptop reporting process for wine | Wine |