Go to: microsoft.com

Click "downloads"

Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)

This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
Leopard.


WARNING!!!!

FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!

In article >,
"zara" > wrote:

> Go to: microsoft.com
>
> Click "downloads"
>
> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>
> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> Leopard.
>
>
> WARNING!!!!
>
> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!

I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the
latest major version of the operating system because it's still so
buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating
system.

It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where
new major versions of the operating system are actually worth
installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks....

--
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming
out any other way."
--George W. Bush in Martinsburg, W. Va., July 4, 2007

"ZnU" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>
>> Click "downloads"
>>
>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>
>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>> Leopard.
>>
>>
>> WARNING!!!!
>>
>> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!
>
> I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the
> latest major version of the operating system because it's still so
> buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating
> system.
>
> It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where
> new major versions of the operating system are actually worth
> installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks....

And you will be patching it for the next two years.

In article >,
"zara" > wrote:

> "ZnU" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "zara" > wrote:
> >
> >> Go to: microsoft.com
> >>
> >> Click "downloads"
> >>
> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
> >>
> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> >> Leopard.
> >>
> >>
> >> WARNING!!!!
> >>
> >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!
> >
> > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the
> > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so
> > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating
> > system.
> >
> > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where
> > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth
> > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks....
>
> And you will be patching it for the next two years.

zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he
even created a thread about!

This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness
to a new level. Kudos!


--
Sandman[.net]

"Sandman" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> "ZnU" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > "zara" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Go to: microsoft.com
>> >>
>> >> Click "downloads"
>> >>
>> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>> >>
>> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster
>> >> than
>> >> Leopard.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> WARNING!!!!
>> >>
>> >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!
>> >
>> > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the
>> > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so
>> > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old
>> > operating
>> > system.
>> >
>> > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where
>> > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth
>> > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks....
>>
>> And you will be patching it for the next two years.
>
> zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he
> even created a thread about!
>
> This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness
> to a new level. Kudos!

You don't know what I downloaded. Ignorance is bliss.

In article >,
"zara" > wrote:

> >> And you will be patching it for the next two years.
> >
> > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he
> > even created a thread about!
> >
> > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness
> > to a new level. Kudos!
>
> You don't know what I downloaded.

I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download.

> Ignorance is bliss.

How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D


--
Sandman[.net]

In article >,
"zara" > wrote:

> "ZnU" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "zara" > wrote:
> >
> >> Go to: microsoft.com
> >>
> >> Click "downloads"
> >>
> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
> >>
> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> >> Leopard.
> >>
> >>
> >> WARNING!!!!
> >>
> >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!!
> >
> > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the
> > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so
> > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating
> > system.
> >
> > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where
> > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth
> > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks....
>
> And you will be patching it for the next two years.

You mean unlike XP, which you're bragging about still patching after six
years?

--
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming
out any other way."
--George W. Bush in Martinsburg, W. Va., July 4, 2007

"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>
>> Click "downloads"
>>
>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>
>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>> Leopard.
>
> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> in the Mac newsgroups.

That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.

In article >,
"zara" > wrote:

> There are some tightass's there who come close to some of the Mac users here.

You misspelled "tightasses."

--
Posted from my 1999 Apple G4 Sawtooth
A 450 MHz G4 running OS X 10.4.8

On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > In article >,
> > "zara" > wrote:
>
> >> Go to: microsoft.com
>
> >> Click "downloads"
>
> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>
> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> >> Leopard.
>
> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> > in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.

Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer
dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine.
I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge.

hOn Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:31:18 -0700, Snit >
wrote:

>On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > "zara" > wrote:
>>
>> >> Go to: microsoft.com
>>
>> >> Click "downloads"
>>
>> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>
>> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>> >> Leopard.
>>
>> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>> > in the Mac newsgroups.
>>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
>Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer
>dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine.
>I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge.

You've always struck me as the kind of man who would like a bottle of
Thunderbird.


--

Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for president 2008

"Snit" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > "zara" > wrote:
>>
>> >> > snip

> Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer
> dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine.
> I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge.


Certainly - do you have a price range in mind?

On Oct 9, 7:31 pm, Snit > wrote:
> > > "Bob Campbell" > wrote:
> > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
> >
> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> > in the Mac newsgroups.
> >
> > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive?

Sure. Ever heard of two-buck Chuck?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Shaw_wine

And, just to stay on topic for the advocacy groups, http://winehq.org
is coming along nicely... it can run Photoshop CS2 pretty well now,
and world domination can't be far behind :-)
- Dan

On Oct 11, 5:48 am, DanKegel > wrote:
> On Oct 9, 7:31 pm, Snit > wrote:
>
> > > > "Bob Campbell" > wrote:
> > > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>
> > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> > > in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> > > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> > > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> > > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> > Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive?
>
> Sure. Ever heard of two-buck Chuck?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Shaw_wine

Eesh. Hangover in a bottle. Avoid. Save a few pennies and spring
for this:

http://www.wine-club-central.com/detail.aspx?ID=8103

Or this:

http://www.shopritewines.com/sku00982.html

Or if you want to go the pinot noir route, try these:

http://www.stinnocentwine.com/NewFiles/pnth05.html

http://winegeeks.com/wines/1339

http://www.northwest-wine.com/domain...noir-2000.html

On Oct 9, 9:31 pm, Snit > wrote:
> On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > > In article >,
> > > "zara" > wrote:
>
> > >> Go to: microsoft.com
>
> > >> Click "downloads"
>
> > >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>
> > >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> > >> Leopard.
>
> > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> > > in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer
> dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine.
> I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge.

Can anybody recommend a good, dry vintage of butane for Snit to
huff? He likes to stay away from added nitrates. Thanks in advance.

"Snit" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > "zara" > wrote:
>>
>> >> Go to: microsoft.com
>>
>> >> Click "downloads"
>>
>> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>
>> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster
>> >> than
>> >> Leopard.
>>
>> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as
>> > us
>> > in the Mac newsgroups.
>>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>> close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>> that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer
> dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine.
> I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge.

Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding drinking
booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my killfile? Oh
well back into the cage you go, PLONK.

John

On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article ,
"zara" > wrote:

>
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >,
>> "zara" > wrote:
>>
>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Click "downloads"
>>>
>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>
>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>> Leopard.
>>
>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
>
Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"?

"George Kerby" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article ,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> In article >,
>>> "zara" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>>
>>>> Click "downloads"
>>>>
>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>>
>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>>> Leopard.
>>>
>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>> close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>> that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>>
>>
> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"?

"Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? Your
women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard.

On 10/10/07 9:58 AM, in article ,
"zara" > wrote:

>
> "George Kerby" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article ,
>> "zara" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> In article >,
>>>> "zara" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Click "downloads"
>>>>>
>>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>>>
>>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>>>> Leopard.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>>>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>>>
>>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>>> close
>>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>>> that
>>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>>>
>>>
>> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"?
>
> "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? Your
> women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard.
>
>
The only "sub-" in here is the size of anything pertaining to your anatomy.

"George Kerby" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07 9:58 AM, in article ,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>>
>> "George Kerby" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article ,
>>> "zara" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> "zara" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click "downloads"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> Leopard.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as
>>>>> us
>>>>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>>>>
>>>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>>>> close
>>>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>>>> that
>>>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"?
>>
>> "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car?
>> Your
>> women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard.
>>
>>
> The only "sub-" in here is the size of anything pertaining to your
> anatomy.

Sorry for your disappointment.

On 2007-10-09 17:32:39 -0700, "zara" > said:

>
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >,
>> "zara" > wrote:
>>
>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Click "downloads"
>>>
>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>
>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>> Leopard.
>>
>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> That was done for a reason.

You were posting while drunk?

-jcr

"John C. Randolph" > wrote in message
news:2007101100234038165-jcrnospam@nospammaccom...
> On 2007-10-09 17:32:39 -0700, "zara" > said:
>
>>
>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> In article >,
>>> "zara" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>>
>>>> Click "downloads"
>>>>
>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>>
>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>>> Leopard.
>>>
>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>>
>> That was done for a reason.
>
> You were posting while drunk?

HAR, HAR, HAR - a real thigh slapper. Your newsreader must be broken, you
didn't get to see the whole of my response. How many Martini's do you suck
down with Lovie before dinner? How many before?

On 2007-10-11 05:43:53 -0700, "zara" > said:

> HAR, HAR, HAR - a real thigh slapper. Your newsreader must be broken,
> you didn't get to see the whole of my response. How many Martini's do
> you suck down with Lovie before dinner? How many before?

I don't drink alcohol, Zero. Back in high school, I looked around and
saw that the kids who did drink tended to make asses of themselves
(rather like you and prat do here), so I declined to participate.

-jcr

"John C. Randolph" > wrote in message
news:2007101203571875249-jcrnospam@nospammaccom...
> On 2007-10-11 05:43:53 -0700, "zara" > said:
>
>> HAR, HAR, HAR - a real thigh slapper. Your newsreader must be broken,
>> you didn't get to see the whole of my response. How many Martini's do
>> you suck down with Lovie before dinner? How many before?
>
> I don't drink alcohol, Zero. Back in high school, I looked around and saw
> that the kids who did drink tended to make asses of themselves (rather
> like you and prat do here), so I declined to participate.

Oh - drugs. That explains a lot.

On Oct 9, 8:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > In article >,
> > "zara" > wrote:
>
> >> Go to: microsoft.com
>
> >> Click "downloads"
>
> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>
> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
> >> Leopard.
>
> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> > in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.

It's not a matter of expense, it's using what's best for the job. If
you don't want it, don't use it. No one is holding a gun to your
head. Now run along and play with your toys.....shoo.... The grown
ups here have work to do.

zara wrote:
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >,
>> "zara" > wrote:
>>
>>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Click "downloads"
>>>
>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>>
>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>>> Leopard.
>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
>> in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>

So you're a wine philistine too?

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote:

>In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
>That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
>worth every penny you pay for it.
>
>Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.

A lot of times people are swayed by the label.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> "zara" > wrote:

>> Some of them, like some of you, believe that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>> That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
>> worth every penny you pay for it.
>>
>> Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>
> A lot of times people are swayed by the label.
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

If it's good enough for Egon, it's good enough for me.

advocacy removed.

--
john mcwilliams

On Oct 9, 7:44 pm, Mayor of R'lyeh > wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote:
> >In article >,
> > "zara" > wrote:
>
> >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
> >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
> >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> >That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
> >worth every penny you pay for it.
>
> >Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>
> A lot of times people are swayed by the label.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...s.html?in_arti...

It seems convenient for Bob to ignore the Mayor's reply...

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:50:02 -0700, Edwin > wrote:

>On Oct 9, 7:44 pm, Mayor of R'lyeh > wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote:
>> >In article >,
>> > "zara" > wrote:
>>
>> >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
>> >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
>> >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>>
>> >That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
>> >worth every penny you pay for it.
>>
>> >Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>>
>> A lot of times people are swayed by the label.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...s.html?in_arti...
>
>It seems convenient for Bob to ignore the Mayor's reply...

Why should Bob work with facts when his myths are so much more
supporting of his positions? 8)

"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>> close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>> that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
> worth every penny you pay for it.
>
> Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.


Quite a profound statement.

I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines.

In article >,
Bob Campbell > wrote:

> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
> > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
> >
> >
> > Quite a profound statement.
> >
> > I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines.
>
> So you drink Mad Dog? That certainly explains your irrational posts
> here.
>
> Bob Campbell

I have a friend who swears that MD 20/20 is what is left over at the
bottom of the vat when they make Prestone (g).

"Kurt Ullman" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> Bob Campbell > wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> "zara" > wrote:
>>
>> > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>> >
>> >
>> > Quite a profound statement.
>> >
>> > I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines.
>>
>> So you drink Mad Dog? That certainly explains your irrational posts
>> here.
>>
>> Bob Campbell
>
> I have a friend who swears that MD 20/20 is what is left over at the
> bottom of the vat when they make Prestone (g).

He's wrong. It's Acetone.

On 10/9/07 7:40 PM, in article
, "Bob Campbell"
> wrote:

> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
> worth every penny you pay for it.
>
> Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also.
>
> Bob Campbell
"It" wouldn't know the difference...

"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come
>> close
>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe
>> that
>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is.
>
> That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is
> worth every penny you pay for it.

And Windows is worth every penny you pay for it too to some people. To
me OS X is lacking so it is not worth every penny I pay for it. Linux is
worth every penny to some and to others it's of no use to them. Please don't
confuse opinions with facts. I've used all of those OSes at one time or
another and they all have good points and bad points.

John

On 2007-10-09 19:04:28 -0500, Bob Campbell > said:

> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> in the Mac newsgroups.
>
> Bob Campbell

Quit feeding the troll.

"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "zara" > wrote:
>
>> Go to: microsoft.com
>>
>> Click "downloads"
>>
>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE)
>>
>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than
>> Leopard.
>
> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us
> in the Mac newsgroups.

Haven't you heard, Macs run Windows now. So this inform is totally
relevant here.

John