"Yes, it is the unborn animals..."
 

Still a ****ing classic!


On 4/11/2012 11:48 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> He believes they can experience things - loss,
> deprivation, unfairness:
>
> Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> that would experience the loss if their lives
> are prevented.
> ****wit - 08/01/2000


I still laugh so hard I nearly cry every time I read that.

"Yes, it is the unborn animals..."
 

On Apr 11, 12:51*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> Still a ****ing classic!
>
> On 4/11/2012 11:48 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>
>
> > He believes they can experience things - loss,
> > deprivation, unfairness:
>
> > Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> > born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> > that would experience the loss if their lives
> > are prevented.
> > ****wit - 08/01/2000
>
> I still laugh so hard I nearly cry every time I read that.


Why are you blabbering away to yourself?

"Yes, it is the unborn animals..."
 

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:46:18 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> wrote:

>On Apr 11, 12:51*pm, Goo wrote:
>> Still a ****ing classic!
>>
>> On 4/11/2012 11:48 AM, Goo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > He believes they can experience things - loss,
>> > deprivation, unfairness:
>>
>> > Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
>> > born if nothing prevents that from happening,
>> > that would experience the loss if their lives
>> > are prevented.
>> > ****wit - 08/01/2000
>>
>> I still laugh so hard I nearly cry every time I read that.
>
>
>Why are you blabbering away to yourself?

Do you think the Goober's stupid enough to think it could eventually somehow
become not a mistake in terminology if he keeps lying about it long enough?