|
Always put quotes around "vegan"
It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome
ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 14, 11:12*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. You're just jealous, Gooberdoodle. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 15, 6:12*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self exaltation and sanctimony. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 17, 3:50*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > *wrote: > >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > exaltation and sanctimony. I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering is inherently ugly, and I don't believe that it involves self- exaltation and sanctimony. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >> exaltation and sanctimony. > > I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > is inherently ugly, and There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego and self-image of the so-called "vegan". |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
"Rupert" > wrote > On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George Plimpton > wrote: >> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> > On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >> >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >> >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously >> >> ugly. >> >> > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >> exaltation and sanctimony. > > I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > is inherently ugly, and I don't believe that it involves self- > exaltation and sanctimony. This issue of collateral death and suffering does not exist in the conscious awareness of the vast majority of vegans. When it is introduced to them, two reactions outnumber all others by a wide margin, the first is denial, the second is 'I'm still doing better than meat eaters'. Concern about the death and suffering they just became aware of virtually never comes into it, and certainly not anywhere near to the level of the concern they claim to have for farmed animals. This is compelling evidence that veganism is primarily about maintaining a holy image, by the implication that the diet and lifestyles of most people is tantamount to barbarism. This is the ugly part, there's almost a Muslim-like zeal to it. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 17, 8:00*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >> exaltation and sanctimony. > > > I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > > is inherently ugly, and > > There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > and self-image of the so-called "vegan". This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 17, 9:48*pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> "Rupert" > wrote > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George Plimpton > wrote: > >> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >> > On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > *wrote: > >> >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >> >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously > >> >> ugly. > > >> > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >> exaltation and sanctimony. > > > I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > > is inherently ugly, and I don't believe that it involves self- > > exaltation and sanctimony. > > This issue of collateral death and suffering does not exist in the conscious > awareness of the vast majority of vegans. When it is introduced to them, two > reactions outnumber all others by a wide margin, the first is denial, the > second is 'I'm still doing better than meat eaters'. Concern about the death > and suffering they just became aware of virtually never comes into it, and > certainly not anywhere near to the level of the concern they claim to have > for farmed animals. This is compelling evidence that veganism is primarily > about maintaining a holy image, by the implication that the diet and > lifestyles of most people is tantamount to barbarism. This is the ugly part, > there's almost a Muslim-like zeal to it. I don't really have any way of knowing. You're presumably basing your remarks on the usenet vegans you have met. I don't have any way of knowing whether this says anything about the vegans I know. I also don't know why I would care. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>> is inherently ugly, and >> >> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you own ego gratification and self-exaltation. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 18, 2:33*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>> is inherently ugly, and > > >> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > > This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > own ego gratification and self-exaltation. How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself, Ball? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 18, 6:16*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > > How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat.. I don't. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > I don't. You do. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 19, 6:13*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > > I don't. > > You do. Why do you think that? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>> I don't. >> >> You do. > > Why do you think that? Why do you ask pointless questions? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 19, 7:15*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>> I don't. > > >> You do. > > > Why do you think that? > > Why do you ask pointless questions? I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>> I don't. >> >>>> You do. >> >>> Why do you think that? >> >> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. Really? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 19, 4:29*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>> I don't. > > >>>> You do. > > >>> Why do you think that? > > >> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > > I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > Really? Yes. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>> You do. >> >>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >> Really? > > Yes. Really!? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:50:07 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, Goo wrote: >>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > >False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >exaltation and sanctimony. How do you want people to feel that your anti-consideration is superior to having consideration for lives of positive value for livestock Goob? Rupert might be able to help you with that, but he doesn't know what it means to have a life of positive value instead of a life of negative value. The doesn't believe the distinction between the two different types of situation means anything. Maybe if you can help him comprehend what the distinction is and how it is significant, he can help you figure out how refusing to consider lives of positive value is superior to taking them into consideration. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:48:14 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >"Rupert" > wrote >> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George Plimpton > wrote: >>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >>> >>> > On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>> >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>> >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously >>> >> ugly. >>> >>> > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >>> >>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >> is inherently ugly, and I don't believe that it involves self- >> exaltation and sanctimony. > >This issue of collateral death and suffering does not exist in the conscious >awareness of the vast majority of vegans. When it is introduced to them, two >reactions outnumber all others by a wide margin, the first is denial, the >second is 'I'm still doing better than meat eaters'. Concern about the death >and suffering they just became aware of virtually never comes into it, and >certainly not anywhere near to the level of the concern they claim to have >for farmed animals. This is compelling evidence that veganism is primarily >about maintaining a holy image, by the implication that the diet and >lifestyles of most people is tantamount to barbarism. This is the ugly part, >there's almost a Muslim-like zeal to it. They SHOULD care especially since they try to PRETEND to care, but it's the same as you and your anticonsideration from my pov, which is even more evidence to me that you're still an eliminationist never having gotten over it or probably even coming close...well...maybe you almost kinda sorta tried to get over it a tiny bit, but that made you feel dirty... Anyway, **** all that. This is a time when you could possibly help your brother a bit, because afaik even at this stage in his life poor Rupert STILL can't comprehend how grass raised beef can sometimes/often involve fewer wildlife deaths than growing and harvesting soy beans does. Do you think you could explain it to him in a way that he could learn to comprehend at least one example? Or do you think that for some reason his brain is physically unable to accept much less appreciate those particular situations? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/19/2012 12:17 PM, ****wit bullshitted pointlessly:
>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >>> >>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >> exaltation and sanctimony. > > How do you want people to feel that your anti-consideration No such thing as "anti-consideration", ****wit, you 13-year-long loser. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:12:54 -0700, George Plimpton > wrote:
>It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. "People who don't want them to exist should be "vegans"." - Goo ""vegans" are interested in their influence on animals, ****wit. They want everyone to be "vegan", which would mean no animals raised for food and other products. That's an influence, whether you like it or not." - Goo logically one MUST conclude that not raising them in the first place is the ethically superior choice." - Goo ""Veg*nism" certainly doesn't harm any living farm animals. And if everyone adopted "veg*nism", no farm animals would live in bad conditions." - Goo you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not to raise the animals as the only way to prevent the harm that results from killing them." - Goo "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo ""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of their deaths" - Goo "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing of the animals erases all of it." - Goo "Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it." - Goo "There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Goo |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
<dh@.> wrote in message ... > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:48:14 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote: > >> >>"Rupert" > wrote >>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George Plimpton > wrote: >>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>> >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>> >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously >>>> >> ugly. >>>> >>>> > What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >>>> >>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >>> >>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>> is inherently ugly, and I don't believe that it involves self- >>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>This issue of collateral death and suffering does not exist in the >>conscious >>awareness of the vast majority of vegans. When it is introduced to them, >>two >>reactions outnumber all others by a wide margin, the first is denial, the >>second is 'I'm still doing better than meat eaters'. Concern about the >>death >>and suffering they just became aware of virtually never comes into it, and >>certainly not anywhere near to the level of the concern they claim to have >>for farmed animals. This is compelling evidence that veganism is primarily >>about maintaining a holy image, by the implication that the diet and >>lifestyles of most people is tantamount to barbarism. This is the ugly >>part, >>there's almost a Muslim-like zeal to it. > > They SHOULD care especially since they try to PRETEND to care, but it's > the > same as you and your anticonsideration from my pov, Its not the same, because your so-called "consideration" is self-serving prattle, similar in many ways to the self-serving prattle that vegans spew. which is even more evidence > to me that you're still an eliminationist never having gotten over it or > probably even coming close...well...maybe you almost kinda sorta tried to > get > over it a tiny bit, but that made you feel dirty... > Anyway, **** all that. This is a time when you could possibly help your > brother a bit, because afaik even at this stage in his life poor Rupert > STILL > can't comprehend how grass raised beef can sometimes/often involve fewer > wildlife deaths than growing and harvesting soy beans does. Do you think > you > could explain it to him in a way that he could learn to comprehend at > least one > example? Or do you think that for some reason his brain is physically > unable to > accept much less appreciate those particular situations? As I recall he has admitted that it is plausible. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, bestiality practitioner - blabbered:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:12:54 -0700, George > wrote: > >> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. Below are all true. > > "People who don't want them to exist should be "vegans"." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > ""vegans" are interested in their influence on animals, > ****wit. They want everyone to be "vegan", which would > mean no animals raised for food and other products. That's > an influence, whether you like it or not." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > logically one MUST conclude that not raising them in the first place is the > ethically superior choice." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > ""Veg*nism" certainly doesn't harm any living farm animals. > And if everyone adopted "veg*nism", no farm animals would > live in bad conditions." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not > to raise the animals as the only way to prevent the harm that > results from killing them." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude > than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > ""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of > their deaths" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing > of the animals erases all of it." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > "Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton > > "There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to > exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 19, 7:27*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>> You do. > > >>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >> Really? > > > Yes. > > Really!? Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>> Really? >> >>> Yes. >> >> Really!? > > Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? Yes. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 20, 4:13*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >>>> Really? > > >>> Yes. > > >> Really!? > > > Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > Yes. You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the moment. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>>>> Really? >> >>>>> Yes. >> >>>> Really!? >> >>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? >> >> Yes. > > You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > moment. You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 20, 5:38*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >>>>>> Really? > > >>>>> Yes. > > >>>> Really!? > > >>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > >> Yes. > > > You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > > moment. > > You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>>>>>> Really? >> >>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>> Really!? >> >>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? >> >>>> Yes. >> >>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the >>> moment. >> >> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. > > Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 20, 7:36*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >>>>>>>> Really? > > >>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>> Really!? > > >>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > >>>> Yes. > > >>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > >>> moment. > > >> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. > > > Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > > is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. > > I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be amusingly stupid. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>>>>>>>> Really? >> >>>>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>>>> Really!? >> >>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? >> >>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the >>>>> moment. >> >>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. >> >>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation >>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. >> >> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. > > Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be > amusingly stupid. No, it almost certainly would not be. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 21, 7:58*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer.. > > >>>>>>>>>> Really? > > >>>>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>>>> Really!? > > >>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > >>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > >>>>> moment. > > >>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. > > >>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > >>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. > > >> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. > > > Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be > > amusingly stupid. > > No, it almost certainly would not be. Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of why I asked the question. When you say that it "almost certainly would not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in your mind about the matter? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On Mar 21, 1:08*am, Rupert > wrote:
> On Mar 21, 7:58*am, George Plimpton > wrote: > > > > > > > On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > *wrote: > > >> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > * *wrote: > > >>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > * * *wrote: > > >>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > > >>>>>>>>>> Really? > > > >>>>>>>>> Yes. > > > >>>>>>>> Really!? > > > >>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > > >>>>>> Yes. > > > >>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > > >>>>> moment. > > > >>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. > > > >>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > > >>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. > > > >> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. > > > > Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be > > > amusingly stupid. > > > No, it almost certainly would not be. > > Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of > why I asked the question. When you say that it "almost certainly would > not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in > your mind about the matter? Gooberdoodle *hopes* his explanation won't be amusingly stupid but he can't guarantee it so he probably won't answer your question. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > wrote: >> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>>>>>> Really!? >> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? >> >>>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the >>>>>>> moment. >> >>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. >> >>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation >>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. >> >>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. >> >>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be >>> amusingly stupid. >> >> No, it almost certainly would not be. > > Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of > why I asked the question. Yes. > When you say that it "almost certainly would > not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in > your mind about the matter? No. |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Really? > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>>>>>> Really!? > > >>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > >>>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > >>>>>>> moment. > > >>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. > > >>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > >>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. > > >>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. > > >>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be > >>> amusingly stupid. > > >> No, it almost certainly would not be. > > > Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of > > why I asked the question. > > Yes. > > > When you say that it "almost certainly would > > not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in > > your mind about the matter? > > No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden - > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen - Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 3/21/2012 9:12 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George > wrote: >> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Really!? >> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? >> >>>>>>>>>> Yes. >> >>>>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the >>>>>>>>> moment. >> >>>>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any. >> >>>>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation >>>>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. >> >>>>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. >> >>>>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be >>>>> amusingly stupid. >> >>>> No, it almost certainly would not be. >> >>> Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of >>> why I asked the question. >> >> Yes. >> >>> When you say that it "almost certainly would >>> not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in >>> your mind about the matter? >> >> No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden - >> >> - Zitierten Text anzeigen - > > Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"? Are you teaching beginning algebra in Germany? |
Always put quotes around "vegan"
On 21 Mrz., 17:19, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/21/2012 9:12 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > * * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > * * * * * * * * * * * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. *It's really all about the ego > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. *You just say that to try to deflect attention from you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Really!? > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind? > > >>>>>>>>>> Yes. > > >>>>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the > >>>>>>>>> moment. > > >>>>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any.. > > >>>>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation > >>>>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it. > > >>>>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it. > > >>>>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be > >>>>> amusingly stupid. > > >>>> No, it almost certainly would not be. > > >>> Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of > >>> why I asked the question. > > >> Yes. > > >>> When you say that it "almost certainly would > >>> not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in > >>> your mind about the matter? > > >> No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden - > > >> - Zitierten Text anzeigen - > > > Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"? > > Are you teaching beginning algebra in Germany?- Zitierten Text ausblenden - > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen - No, I'm not doing any teaching, why? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter