http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6180753.stm

Good, innit?!

And being Vegan 4A long time makes you even sensibbler!!!

;o)

nemo, congenital liar, wrote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6180753.stm
>
> Good, innit?!

Did you note the part about how many of the "vegetarians" eat fish and
chicken, asswipe?

> And being Vegan 4A long time makes you even sensibbler!!!

No, it makes you stupid and causes you to overlook details like:
There was no difference in IQ score between strict vegetarians
and those who said they were vegetarian but who reported eating
fish or chicken.

On May 22, 6:39 am, chico > wrote:
> nemo, congenital liar, wrote:
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6180753.stm
>
> > Good, innit?!
>
> Did you note the part about how many of the "vegetarians" eat fish and
> chicken, asswipe?
>
> > And being Vegan 4A long time makes you even sensibbler!!!
>
> No, it makes you stupid and causes you to overlook details like:
> There was no difference in IQ score between strict vegetarians
> and those who said they were vegetarian but who reported eating
> fish or chicken.

Wow get that sand out of your vagina, shouldn't we all just group
together and hate the real enemy hear? I mean come on Vegans and
vegetarians group together man. Lets look at the real problem, Meat
is delicious and you should eat it before you turn into a giant pussy
vegan like this guy here. Also I think If you claim to be smarter
then Meat eaters or vegatarians, you could have come up with a better
insult then asswipe or take the time to use words instead of being
lazy using conjunctions like 4A? I mean how hard is it to spell out,
for A?
I eat meat and in less then a minute, I've made more sense then
you have in youre whole rambling statement, wow I guess science was
wrong once again. Seriously thought if you have to go around stating
some scientific non conclusive study to make yourself feel beter about
yourself or to get yourself through the day, you live a shallow life
and you should just give up right now. There are alot of worse and
bigger things in this world then debating your inteligence because you
dont eat meat.

Michael Wolf, ignorant product of incest, wrote:

> On May 22, 6:39 am, chico > wrote:

See the line above this one, retard? That's the person to whom you're
replying.

>> nemo, congenital liar, wrote:

See the line above this one, retard? That's the person to whom the
person above was replying. Idiot.

>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6180753.stm
>>> Good, innit?!
>> Did you note the part about how many of the "vegetarians" eat fish and
>> chicken, asswipe?
>>
>>> And being Vegan 4A long time makes you even sensibbler!!!
>> No, it makes you stupid and causes you to overlook details like:
>> There was no difference in IQ score between strict vegetarians
>> and those who said they were vegetarian but who reported eating
>> fish or chicken.
>
> Wow get that sand out of your vagina,

Get your replies-to straightened out, you semi-literate baboon.

> shouldn't we all just group
> together and hate the real enemy hear?

Here.

> I mean come on Vegans and
> vegetarians group together man. Lets

Let's

> look at the real problem, Meat
> is delicious and you should eat it before you turn into a giant pussy
> vegan like this guy here. Also I think If you claim to be smarter
> then Meat eaters or vegatarians,

Vegetarians.

> you could have come up with a better
> insult then

Than.

> asswipe

Is posting to USENET a new endeavor of yours, asshole? If so you would
understand you're responding to two different posts. You *clueless* ****.

> or take the time to use words instead of being
> lazy using conjunctions like 4A? I mean how hard is it to spell out,
> for A?

Apparently that's easier than spelling single syllable words like THAN,
HERE, LET'S, and YOUR. You ignorant product of incest.

> I eat meat and in less then a minute, I've made more sense then
> you have in youre

Your. And no, you haven't made sense.

> whole rambling statement,

The problem, you rambling simpleton, is you responded to two different
people in the same post and that's way above your comprehension. Maybe
you should stick with something within your own learning (dis)abilities
and feeble faculties, like sniffing glue.

> wow I guess science was wrong once again.

No, ****, science is correct -- which means nemo, the aged congenital
liar who got a new computer with his dole, is wrong. Many of the
"vegetarians" surveyed in that old article ate meat: chicken and fish.

> Seriously thought

Seriously, though,...

> if you have to go around stating
> some scientific non conclusive

Try "inconclusive," dumbass.

> study to make yourself feel beter

Better.

> about
> yourself or to get yourself through the day, you live a shallow life
> and you should just give up right now. There are alot

a lot

> of worse and
> bigger things in this world then

Than.

> debating your inteligence


Intelligence -- something above your ability, clearly.

> because you dont eat meat.

Don't. Retard.

On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:21:17 -0400, chico wrote:

> Michael Wolf, ignorant product of incest, wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 6:39 am, chico > wrote:
>
> See the line above this one, retard? That's the person to whom you're
> replying.
>
>>> nemo, congenital liar, wrote:
>
> See the line above this one, retard? That's the person to whom the
> person above was replying. Idiot.
>
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6180753.stm
>>>> Good, innit?!
>>> Did you note the part about how many of the "vegetarians" eat fish and
>>> chicken, asswipe?
>>>
>>>> And being Vegan 4A long time makes you even sensibbler!!!
>>> No, it makes you stupid and causes you to overlook details like:
>>> There was no difference in IQ score between strict vegetarians
>>> and those who said they were vegetarian but who reported eating
>>> fish or chicken.
>>
>> Wow get that sand out of your vagina,
>
> Get your replies-to straightened out, you semi-literate baboon.
>
>> shouldn't we all just group
>> together and hate the real enemy hear?
>
> Here.
>
>> I mean come on Vegans and
>> vegetarians group together man. Lets
>
> Let's
>
>> look at the real problem, Meat
>> is delicious and you should eat it before you turn into a giant pussy
>> vegan like this guy here. Also I think If you claim to be smarter
>> then Meat eaters or vegatarians,
>
> Vegetarians.
>
>> you could have come up with a better
>> insult then
>
> Than.
>
>> asswipe
>
> Is posting to USENET a new endeavor of yours, asshole? If so you would
> understand you're responding to two different posts. You *clueless* ****.
>
>> or take the time to use words instead of being
>> lazy using conjunctions like 4A? I mean how hard is it to spell out,
>> for A?
>
> Apparently that's easier than spelling single syllable words like THAN,
> HERE, LET'S, and YOUR. You ignorant product of incest.
>
>> I eat meat and in less then a minute, I've made more sense then
>> you have in youre
>
> Your. And no, you haven't made sense.
>
>> whole rambling statement,
>
> The problem, you rambling simpleton, is you responded to two different
> people in the same post and that's way above your comprehension. Maybe
> you should stick with something within your own learning (dis)abilities
> and feeble faculties, like sniffing glue.
>
>> wow I guess science was wrong once again.
>
> No, ****, science is correct -- which means nemo, the aged congenital
> liar who got a new computer with his dole, is wrong. Many of the
> "vegetarians" surveyed in that old article ate meat: chicken and fish.
>
>> Seriously thought
>
> Seriously, though,...
>
>> if you have to go around stating
>> some scientific non conclusive
>
> Try "inconclusive," dumbass.
>
>> study to make yourself feel beter
>
> Better.
>
>> about
>> yourself or to get yourself through the day, you live a shallow life
>> and you should just give up right now. There are alot
>
> a lot
>
>> of worse and
>> bigger things in this world then
>
> Than.
>
>> debating your inteligence
>
>
> Intelligence -- something above your ability, clearly.
>
>> because you dont eat meat.
>
> Don't. Retard.

Best

Post

Ever!

Ha!