<http://www.tenren.com/puerhtea1.html>

Is this a wet method type?


TBerk

T > wrote in message .com>...
> <http://www.tenren.com/puerhtea1.html>
>
> Is this a wet method type?
>
>
> TBerk

All "black tea based" "black" "red" &c. pu-erhs are "wet method
type"--and all of Ten Ren's pu-erhs listed under "pu-erh" are "black"
pu-erhs.

The only "green" or unaged puerh i've found on Ten Ren's site is
http://www.tenren.com/yuntuogreent.html

ZBL

Lewis Perin > wrote in message >...
> (Zephyrus) writes:
>
> > T > wrote in message .com>...
> > > <http://www.tenren.com/puerhtea1.html>
> > >
> > > Is this a wet method type?
> > >
> > >
> > > TBerk
> >
> > All "black tea based" "black" "red" &c. pu-erhs are "wet method
> > type"--and all of Ten Ren's pu-erhs listed under "pu-erh" are "black"
> > pu-erhs.
> >
> > The only "green" or unaged puerh i've found on Ten Ren's site is
> > http://www.tenren.com/yuntuogreent.html
>
> Sorry, but "green" isn't a synonym for "unaged" in Puerh parlance. As
> in most Puerh matters, see Mike Petro's authoritative
>
> http://www.pu-erh.net/
>
> /Lew
> ---
> Lew Perin /
> http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html

Sorry. A slight oversight. What I meant is an unaged but *ageable* pu-erh.

Z

OK, 'tanks.

Asking & Learning.


TBerk

OK, 'tanks.

Asking & Learning.


TBerk

OK, 'tanks.

Asking & Learning.


TBerk