In article >, says...
> In article .com>,
> > wrote:
> >John Mackey is instead a libertarian with right-wing tendencies.
> >Mackey says that Milton Friedman is his hero.
> >He's a devotee of Ayn Rand.
> >He's opposed to national health insurance.
> >He's a union buster.
>
> Hmm... all the more reason to shop at WF, IMO.
>
> I don't agree with doing away with criminal liability for corporations.
>
> But then, who cares?
>
> If I boycotted all stores run or staffed by people who didn't share
> my views on politics, law, religion, art, or whatever, I'd starve.
>
> -A
>

I want the 14th Amendment modified to include language that makes it
clear we're talking about real human beings when the word 'person' is
used. That way corporation couldn't hide behind the 1st, 4th, 5th, etc.

T wrote:

>
> I want the 14th Amendment modified to include language that makes it
> clear we're talking about real human beings when the word 'person' is
> used. That way corporation couldn't hide behind the 1st, 4th, 5th, etc.

Then let's modify the 10th to include the words "herein specifically"
between "not" and "delegated".

--
The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who
think. - Horace Walpole

"T" > wrote in message
. ..
> In article >, says...
>> In article .com>,
>> > wrote:
>> >John Mackey is instead a libertarian with right-wing tendencies.
>> >Mackey says that Milton Friedman is his hero.
>> >He's a devotee of Ayn Rand.
>> >He's opposed to national health insurance.
>> >He's a union buster.
>>
>> Hmm... all the more reason to shop at WF, IMO.
>>
>> I don't agree with doing away with criminal liability for corporations.
>>
>> But then, who cares?
>>
>> If I boycotted all stores run or staffed by people who didn't share
>> my views on politics, law, religion, art, or whatever, I'd starve.
>>
>> -A
>>
>
> I want the 14th Amendment modified to include language that makes it
> clear we're talking about real human beings when the word 'person' is
> used. That way corporation couldn't hide behind the 1st, 4th, 5th, etc.
>

I agree, but not for your totally miss educated reasons