Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I made a batch of chicken stock yesterday and cooled it by the method I
described in a prior thread. I place the stock pot on a 1 inch tall wire grid trivet in the laundry tub, then fill the tub up with cold water to about the level of liquid inside the stock pot. This time I got out my digital thermometer and measured the temperatures a few times. I was surprised at how fast the stock cooled... even faster than I had thought. Here are the temperatures (in degrees F) of the stock and the cooling water initially, after 15 minutes, and after 45 minutes: Initial 15 Minutes 45 Minutes Stock 160 85 75 Cooling Water 64 71 72 So most of the cooling took place within the first 15 minutes. At 45 minutes, it was essentially as cool as it was going to get (without changing the cooling water). 75 degrees is pretty much room temperature. The rate of cooling is going to change depending on the time of year and the temperature of the incoming tap water. The greater the initial temperature difference between the stock and the cooling water, the faster it will go. In mid winter, my tap water was at 43 degrees, but I didn't measure stock cooling at that time. In summer, my tap water will be even higher than it is now. Some other parameters... the stock pot is a tall copper one, 8 inches in diameter and 10 inches tall. There was between 3-1/2 and 4 quarts of stock in the pot. I suspect the results wouldn't have been quite so good with a low wide stock pot, or one made of another material. With a low wide pot, I think there is less surface area exposed to the cooling water, and there will be less total cooling water in the tub. You can only fill the tub up to about the same level as in the pot, or the pot will "float away". Using a trivet under the pot is even more important on a low wide pot, as a greater percentage of the available cooling surface area is on the bottom compared to a tall narrow one. I always strain the stock, then cool it. That is the method recommended in all the cook books I have, and they also say not to cool totally covered or the stock can turn sour. Regarding the initial stock temperature of 160 above, that is after straining, which cooled it off a bit. The temperature coming off the stove was more like 170 (or even up to 180... I don't remember what I saw). -- ( #wff_ng_7# at #verizon# period #net# ) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cooling it | General Cooking | |||
Vegetable stock (revisited & retro) | General Cooking | |||
shrimp shells & stock revisited | General Cooking | |||
Dry ice for cooling must? | Winemaking | |||
Chicken stock and stock pots | Cooking Equipment |