We're together again!
Dee Dee

On Mon 30 Jan 2006 02:05:18p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dee Randall?

> We're together again!
> Dee Dee

Congratulations! So what was the problem?

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

"Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
28.19...
> On Mon 30 Jan 2006 02:05:18p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dee
> Randall?
>
>> We're together again!
>> Dee Dee
>
> Congratulations! So what was the problem?
>
> --
> Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬

My fault -- after she wrote me, seeing the address again, I checked the
'blocked senders" for the dozen-th time; voila! there was the address.
Now - wait a minute! I can't compare and check all my names along with
their addy's. Not gonna do it! :-))

I'll wait to see if I see a posting on this ng from her. Oh, Doooorrraaa!
Hope you're not angry with me!
Dee Dee

On Mon 30 Jan 2006 02:47:44p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dee
Randall?

>
> "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> 28.19...
>> On Mon 30 Jan 2006 02:05:18p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dee
>> Randall?
>>
>>> We're together again!
>>> Dee Dee
>>
>> Congratulations! So what was the problem?
>>
>> --
>> Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
>
> My fault -- after she wrote me, seeing the address again, I checked the
> 'blocked senders" for the dozen-th time; voila! there was the address.
> Now - wait a minute! I can't compare and check all my names along with
> their addy's. Not gonna do it! :-))
>
> I'll wait to see if I see a posting on this ng from her. Oh,
> Doooorrraaa! Hope you're not angry with me!
> Dee Dee

I'm sure many of us have done something similar, Dee. Once, for a brief
time, I had myself blocked from my own e-mail. Talk about stupid! :-)

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:05:18 -0500, "Dee Randall"
> wrote:

>We're together again!
>Dee Dee
>
And we're all so happy for the two of you!


modom

"modom" > wrote in message
news
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:05:18 -0500, "Dee Randall"
> > wrote:
>
>>We're together again!
>>Dee Dee
>>
> And we're all so happy for the two of you!
>
> modom

Rascal. Thanks for your help, modom.
Dora

"limey" > wrote in message
...
>
> "modom" > wrote in message
> news
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:05:18 -0500, "Dee Randall"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>We're together again!
>>>Dee Dee
>>>
>> And we're all so happy for the two of you!
>>
>> modom
>
> Rascal. Thanks for your help, modom.
> Dora
Confirmed; I see your postings now.
Yes, we are REALLY together again now.
Thanks everyone.
Dee Dee

"Dee Randall" > wrote

> Confirmed; I see your postings now.
> Yes, we are REALLY together again now.
> Thanks everyone.

Well, I can sleep tonight, thank goodness (laugh).

nancy

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dee Randall" > wrote
>
>> Confirmed; I see your postings now.
>> Yes, we are REALLY together again now.
>> Thanks everyone.
>
> Well, I can sleep tonight, thank goodness (laugh).
>
> nancy
Nitey-night. (humming a lullaby)
Dee Dee