just an old silly joke I just got in the email
yes of course it's off topic
<snort>---that's a laugh btw...i don't do coke...

see... <snooort>

teeehe

Fresh from the shower, I stood in front of the mirror complaining to my

husband that my breasts were too small. Instead of characteristically
telling me it's not so, he uncharacteristically came up with a
suggestion.
"If you want your breasts to grow, then everyday take a piece of toilet

paper and rub it between them for a few seconds."

Willing to try anything, I fetched a piece of toilet paper and stood in

front of the mirror, rubbing it between my breasts.

"How long will this take?", I asked.

"They will grow larger over a period of years", my husband replies.

I stopped. "Do you really think rubbing a piece of toilet paper between

my breasts every day will make my breasts bigger over the years?"

Without missing a beat he says, "Worked for your butt, didn't it?"

He is still alive, and with a great deal of therapy, he may even walk
again.

On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
Boatwright?

No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".

> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
> From: "Wayne Boatwright" >

If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
> Boatwright?
>
> No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>
> > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> > Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
> > From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>
> If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
> really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.


!!! PLONK !!!

brbrbrbrbrbrr


--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________


Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
> Boatwright?
>
> No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>
> > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> > Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
> > From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>
> If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
> really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.

I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.
--

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:33:14p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?

> On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
>> Boatwright?
>>
>> No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>>
>> > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>> > Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
>> > From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>>
>> If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
>> really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.
>
> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
> important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
> part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.

So far I haven't been spammed, but that's easy enough to control. I can't
understand why they're targeting Charlotte. What on earth did she do to
deserve it? Nothing...

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

sf wrote:

> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
> important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
> part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.


Im sorry, I don't do spam
I dont like it, I dont do it
what the heck for?
I have a full time job
kicking ya'lls butts!


--

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:44:17p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?

>
> sf wrote:
>
>> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
>> important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
>> part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.
>
>
> Im sorry, I don't do spam
> I dont like it, I dont do it
> what the heck for?
> I have a full time job
> kicking ya'lls butts!

Oy, it's back! And spreading like a virus...

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On 25 Jan 2006 06:42:43 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:33:14p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?
>
> > I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
> > important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
> > part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.
>
> So far I haven't been spammed, but that's easy enough to control.

I meant invading rfc - didn't use the right word.

> I can't
> understand why they're targeting Charlotte. What on earth did she do to
> deserve it? Nothing...

I agree. If those kooks have a problem with her in their kook group,
it's obviously because she's winning the game. Too bad their mommys
never taught them how to play nice.
--

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

sf wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
> > On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
> > Boatwright?
> >
> > No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
> >
> > > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> > > Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
> > > From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
> >
> > If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
> > really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.
>
> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
> important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
> part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.

I don't think Barry is part of that group. I think Barry is just
poking fun.

-L.

On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
<wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
>Boatwright?
>
>No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>
>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>> Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
>> From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>
>If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
>really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.
>
>--
>Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬


I didn't realise it hadn't come from you. I thought it was a pretty
good joke though.

On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
<wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
>Boatwright?
>
>No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>
>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>> Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
>> From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>
>If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
>really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.

Well, the joke was funny, imo.

--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Wed 25 Jan 2006 02:54:55a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Kathy in
NZ?

> On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
> <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
>>Boatwright?
>>
>>No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>>
>>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>>> Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
>>> From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>>
>>If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
>>really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.
>>
>>--
>>Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
>
>
> I didn't realise it hadn't come from you. I thought it was a pretty
> good joke though.

Yes, it was pretty funny. Just not me.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On Wed 25 Jan 2006 04:25:58a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Denny
Wheeler?

> On 25 Jan 2006 04:34:02 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
> <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue 24 Jan 2006 08:19:29p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Wayne
>>Boatwright?
>>
>>No, it was *not* Wayne Boatwright. it was "bigbadbarry".
>>
>>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>>> Subject: I ain't saying she's a gold digger but uh...
>>> From: "Wayne Boatwright" >
>>
>>If it isn't obvious, one of our asshole posters is impersonating me. I
>>really don't care, as I'm sure you all know the difference.
>
> Well, the joke was funny, imo.

Yes, it is funny, but I didn't write it.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On 25 Jan 2006 06:53:34 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:44:17p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?
>
> >
> > sf wrote:
> >
> >> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a very
> >> important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They have to be
> >> part of the same group that is spamming and trolling about Charlotte.
> >
> >
> > Im sorry, I don't do spam
> > I dont like it, I dont do it
> > what the heck for?
> > I have a full time job
> > kicking ya'lls butts!
>
> Oy, it's back! And spreading like a virus...

LOL! Yes it is, but at least bigbadbarry is a "tad" honest and not
being a total faker.
--

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

On Wed 25 Jan 2006 11:33:47p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?

> On 25 Jan 2006 06:53:34 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:44:17p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?
>>
>> >
>> > sf wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
>> >> very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
>> >> have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
>> >> about Charlotte.
>> >
>> >
>> > Im sorry, I don't do spam
>> > I dont like it, I dont do it
>> > what the heck for?
>> > I have a full time job kicking ya'lls butts!
>>
>> Oy, it's back! And spreading like a virus...
>
> LOL! Yes it is, but at least bigbadbarry is a "tad" honest and not
> being a total faker.

You're right about that, of course, but still a nuisance in my book.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
________________________________________

Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

On 26 Jan 2006 07:40:04 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Wed 25 Jan 2006 11:33:47p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?
>
> > On 25 Jan 2006 06:53:34 +0100, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >>
> >> Oy, it's back! And spreading like a virus...
> >
> > LOL! Yes it is, but at least bigbadbarry is a "tad" honest and not
> > being a total faker.
>
> You're right about that, of course, but still a nuisance in my book.

I know you didn't appreciate it, nor did I.
--

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

sf wrote:

(to wayne)

>I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
> very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
> have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
> about Charlotte.

I don't necessarily think so (actually the "group" that is taking my name
in vain is very likely an individual who likes to morph).

There are just a lot of folks out there with time on their hands. Someone
could have wandered in on the crosspost ;-).

I guess the words to the wise is "Mind the crossposts" and "Check the
headers".

Charlotte
http://loveandcooking.blogspot.com
--

"Charlotte L. Blackmer" > wrote in message
...
>
> sf wrote:
>
> (to wayne)
>
> >I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
> > very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
> > have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
> > about Charlotte.
>
> I don't necessarily think so (actually the "group" that is taking my name
> in vain is very likely an individual who likes to morph).
>
> There are just a lot of folks out there with time on their hands. Someone
> could have wandered in on the crosspost ;-).
>

You're smarter than the average bear. Some folks are just out there having
fun,
they are not building A Community or engaging in A Real Social Life in
Usenet.


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> (to wayne)
>
>
>>I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
>>very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
>>have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
>>about Charlotte.
>
>
> I don't necessarily think so (actually the "group" that is taking my name
> in vain is very likely an individual who likes to morph).
>
> There are just a lot of folks out there with time on their hands. Someone
> could have wandered in on the crosspost ;-).
>
> I guess the words to the wise is "Mind the crossposts" and "Check the
> headers".
>
> Charlotte
> http://loveandcooking.blogspot.com

So you are the famous Charlotte! I'm so pleased to meet you. Your blog
is pretty interesting so I'll spend a little time there. I'm looking
forward to you sharing your cooking experiences. Good filters will take
care of the crossposting and trolls so I hope you stick around this
rather friendly newsgroup. There are a few here you might want to
filter but once you do that things are smooth sailing

In article >,
L'Espérance > wrote:
>Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>
>> (to wayne)
>>
>>
>>>I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
>>>very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
>>>have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
>>>about Charlotte.
>>
>>
>> I don't necessarily think so (actually the "group" that is taking my name
>> in vain is very likely an individual who likes to morph).
>>
>> There are just a lot of folks out there with time on their hands. Someone
>> could have wandered in on the crosspost ;-).
>>
>> I guess the words to the wise is "Mind the crossposts" and "Check the
>> headers".
>>
>> Charlotte
>> http://loveandcooking.blogspot.com
>
>So you are the famous Charlotte! I'm so pleased to meet you. Your blog
>is pretty interesting so I'll spend a little time there. I'm looking
>forward to you sharing your cooking experiences. Good filters will take
>care of the crossposting and trolls so I hope you stick around this
>rather friendly newsgroup. There are a few here you might want to
>filter but once you do that things are smooth sailing

I started posting to rec.food.cooking in 1995 and was at the Very
First Cook-In, so I think I officially qualify as an Old-Timer, even
though my participation is really, really sporadic these days. I
agree with you about the general friendliness and the utility of
good filters though ;-). Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by subject
line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.

Charlotte
--

"Like traditional gangs, Usenet-based gangs are engaged in wars for the

purpose of controlling turf, with "turf" in this context denoting the
public reputation of a community / organization. Since Usenet is the
ultimate environment for free speech (i.e. public and unmoderated with
no ownership or oversight), the gang serves as a mechanism of mob rule,

harassing and defaming what it cannot control through conventional
moderation and censorship."

http://www.fireflysun.com/book/sci.p...chotherapy.php

===============================================

L'Espérance wrote:
> Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> >
> > (to wayne)
> >
> >
> >>I don't understand this turn of events, but it signifies you're a
> >>very important part if rfc and "some people" are jealous. They
> >>have to be part of the same group that is spamming and trolling
> >>about Charlotte.
> >
> >
> > I don't necessarily think so (actually the "group" that is taking my name
> > in vain is very likely an individual who likes to morph).
> >
> > There are just a lot of folks out there with time on their hands. Someone
> > could have wandered in on the crosspost ;-).
> >
> > I guess the words to the wise is "Mind the crossposts" and "Check the
> > headers".
> >
> > Charlotte
> > http://loveandcooking.blogspot.com
>
> So you are the famous Charlotte! I'm so pleased to meet you. Your blog
> is pretty interesting so I'll spend a little time there. I'm looking
> forward to you sharing your cooking experiences. Good filters will take
> care of the crossposting and trolls so I hope you stick around this
> rather friendly newsgroup. There are a few here you might want to
> filter but once you do that things are smooth sailing

Ssshh... don't let the trolls hear this, she's out of control:

From: (Charlotte L. Blackmer)
Newsgroups: alt.music.michael-jackson,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Nomination - Pamela Russell for Foam Duck (was: F'loon
math)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Lemony Goodness
Lines: 52
Message-ID: >
References: >
>
>
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: green.rahul.net
X-Trace: blue.rahul.net 1138479680 20842 192.160.13.49 (28 Jan 2006
20:21:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Originator: (Charlotte L. Blackmer)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)

In article >,
Peter J Ross > wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:20:58 -0500, Daedalus > wrote
>in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:46:36 -0600, (Pam totally
>> OWNS the alt.mjj group), wrote:
>>
>>>HaterFreaks, et.al,
>>>
>>>Why are YOU PEOPLE so DUMB? Why do you people make "mountains" out of
>>>"molehills"? Even a little kid would know that 2003 is ALMOST five years
>>>ago.
>>
>> December 2003 was two years and one month ago st00pid. You've been
>> told this already by the smart kids.
>
>I've just checked the list of sPammy's kook awards, and I can hardly
>believe what I find: although she held the Office of Village Idiot for
>a month, she's won no awards for stupidity or cluelessness at all!
>
> Kook of the Year, 2005
> Kook of the Month, September 2004
> Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award, March 2005
> Palmjob Paddle, September 2004
> Palmjob Paddle, November 2005
> George Pickett Memorial Trophy, September 2004
> Joseph Bartlo "Pathetic Anal Pineapple" Award, November 2005
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, December 2005
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2005
> Busted Urinal Award
> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
> Bag of Coal, 2004
> Bag of Coal, 2005
> Edmond Wollmann Memorial Rubber Turkey Award, Christmas Day 2005
>
>So let's get started.
>
>For thinking that six minus three ALMOST equals five, not to mention
>daily examples of other kinds of moronic, cretinous idiocy, of which
>"bipolar is slang for bisexual" was my all-time favourite, I hereby
>nominate Pamela K Russell for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck.
>
>Bullis in 1999: "'Movy'. Movies is plural."
>Russell in 2006: "2003 is ALMOST five years ago."
>
>Seconds?

Thirds, which is almost a fifth, for this stellar piece of Foam
Duckery.

Charlotte
--

Smoked Salmon wrote:
> "Like traditional gangs, Usenet-based gangs are engaged in wars for the
>
> purpose of controlling turf, with "turf" in this context denoting the
> public reputation of a community / organization. Since Usenet is the
> ultimate environment for free speech (i.e. public and unmoderated with
> no ownership or oversight), the gang serves as a mechanism of mob rule,
>
> harassing and defaming what it cannot control through conventional
> moderation and censorship."
>
> http://www.fireflysun.com/book/sci.p...chotherapy.php

But the only successful "gangs" are those who drive away those
willing to go away; i.e., the thugs make the nice folks go off to
proprietary discussion fora.

Luckily, in this newsgroup, there isn't much ganging-up. Just Sheldon.
And everyone tends to crap on the trolls.

But it's a rare one.

--Blair
"Over 20 years of Usenet sociology, and counting."

uz051235198 wrote:
> You're smarter than the average bear. Some folks are just out there having
> fun,
> they are not building A Community or engaging in A Real Social Life in
> Usenet.

And some are "out there" to ruin the groups where people do care about
each other and consider each other friends. Like this one.

Consider yourself outed.

-L.

Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
subject
> line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.

I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
very active group! (And always has been.)
-L.

-L. wrote:
> Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
> subject
> > line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.
>
> I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
> very active group! (And always has been.)
> -L.

~ { DING } ~

http://www.geocities.com/oh_brutha20005/card12.html


It seems that you just don't want to accept the basic principle that
you eventually get "pay back" for your "bad karma" .... ...........
.......... ...........
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rapy/msg/e7a08...

http://www.blogger.com/profile/541287

Do you get the point?



--
DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® #15-51506-253.
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Liar. You want me so bad you have to hate me, because you
know I don't swing your way, pervert."
http://www.geocities.com/jamiemps/Jamie-1.jpg
--(Jamie Eckles projection)



BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

DrPostman wrote:
> -L. wrote:
> > Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
> > subject
> > > line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.
> >
> > I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
> > very active group! (And always has been.)
> > -L.
>
> ~ { DING } ~
>
> http://www.geocities.com/oh_brutha20005/card12.html
>
>
> It seems that you just don't want to accept the basic principle that
> you eventually get "pay back" for your "bad karma" .... ...........

The bitch reaped only a small portion of what she sowed. She's not
fooling anyone.
None of your links work, BTW.

-L.

-L. wrote:
> DrPostman wrote:
> > -L. wrote:
> > > Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
> > > subject
> > > > line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
> > > very active group! (And always has been.)
> > > -L.
> >
> > ~ { DING } ~
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/oh_brutha20005/card12.html
> >
> >
> > It seems that you just don't want to accept the basic principle that
> > you eventually get "pay back" for your "bad karma" .... ...........
>
> The bitch reaped only a small portion of what she sowed. She's not fooling anyone.

She's just being a goof.

> None of your links work, BTW.

Yep. I've deleted them all.

At least in my hit and run tactics, AUK-Tards get roughed up.


>
> -L.

DrPostman wrote:
> -L. wrote:
> > DrPostman wrote:
> > > -L. wrote:
> > > > Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
> > > > subject
> > > > > line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
> > > > very active group! (And always has been.)
> > > > -L.
> > >
> > > ~ { DING } ~
> > >
> > > http://www.geocities.com/oh_brutha20005/card12.html
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that you just don't want to accept the basic principle that
> > > you eventually get "pay back" for your "bad karma" .... ...........
> >
> > The bitch reaped only a small portion of what she sowed. She's not fooling anyone.
>
> She's just being a goof.

We may not be talking about the same person.

-L.

-L. wrote:
> DrPostman wrote:
> > -L. wrote:
> > > DrPostman wrote:
> > > > -L. wrote:
> > > > > Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:Even in the "Good Old Days" I sorted by
> > > > > subject
> > > > > > line and read no more than about 1/3 of the posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure how anyone could do anything but the above - this is a
> > > > > very active group! (And always has been.)
> > > > > -L.
> > > >
> > > > ~ { DING } ~
> > > >
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/oh_brutha20005/card12.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems that you just don't want to accept the basic principle that
> > > > you eventually get "pay back" for your "bad karma" .... ...........
> > >
> > > The bitch reaped only a small portion of what she sowed. She's not fooling anyone.
> >
> > She's just being a goof.
>
> We may not be talking about the same person.

Hehehe, maybe :-))))))))

> -L.