Please Andrew

Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
postings unread.

"Kathy in NZ" > wrote in message
...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your postings
unread.

Yeah. This is OUR group. I have not even seen one recipe he has posted.

"Kathy in NZ" > wrote in message
...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.

Why don't you email him privately? http://www.heartmdphd.com/ac.asp

He's been changing the email address in his newsreader daily lately so he
can't be blocked. Public appeals only encourage more postings.

He's in several other groups too and always upsets people. He seems to be a
lonesome sad kinda guy who has too much time on his hands and no people
skills. I blocked him ages ago in the diabetes groups and it looks like I'll
have to do the same here. Just set your spam block software to block
anything
coming in from @heartmdphd.com. That should catch all of his aliases



"Kathy in NZ" > wrote in message
...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.

In article >, says...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.
>

The little ******* changes addresses every now and then and gets past my
killfiles.

If I met him in person I'd be all gigliotti on him.

"Kathy in NZ" > wrote in message
...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.

Ack, Kathy. I when I saw the words Andrew B. Chung, my immediate thought
was, "KILLFILE". I almost plonked *you*. Good save!

C

Chung and the Twittering One should get together!!!

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> Chung and the Twittering One should get together!!!
>

Who's the Twittering One?

?

Chris

I don't know how to post URLs to other posts on other groups, but if
you go to misc.legal and do a search for "NYU Medical Center ~ YOU SUCK
~ !!!!!" you will see tons of posts by her. She has some kind of gruge
against NYU Medical Center.

She would be a perfect match-up with "Dr. Chung."

Dr. Chung can you go help her???? ; )

http://www.devilducky.com/media/40716/

> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.

Perhaps our appeals to end his unrelated intrusions is to appeal to
Google to shut him down.
Start a petition perhaps... surely he's breaking some agreement term
of use. Kev

kevnbro wrote:

> > Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> > postings unread.
>
> Perhaps our appeals to end his unrelated intrusions is to appeal to
> Google to shut him down.
> Start a petition perhaps... surely he's breaking some agreement term
> of use. Kev



What he is doing can be construed as "spamming" (even though it's not
commercial), this is forbidden by Google's TOS. So yeah, report him...

--
Best
Greg

"Kathy in NZ" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> Please Andrew
>
> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
> postings unread.

I kill him 10 times in a day but he re-grow like a mushroom DD
I propose one thing. Why don't we go to their NG to speak of our cooking?
Pandora

>What he is doing can be construed as "spamming" (even though it's not >commercial), this is forbidden by Google's TOS. So yeah, report him...

Only problem with reporting him is he'll run off to Fox News
screaming, "christian persecution! christian persecution!!"

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:43:21 +0100, "Pandora" >
wrote:

>
>"Kathy in NZ" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>> Please Andrew
>>
>> Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
>> postings unread.
>
>I kill him 10 times in a day but he re-grow like a mushroom DD
>I propose one thing. Why don't we go to their NG to speak of our cooking?
>Pandora
>

No sense in taking it out on anyone other than Chung. I imagine
everyone in every ng he goes to is as upset as we are.


jim

>Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your postings unread.

LOFL! Expect one of two responses, if at all:

1) Sorry if the truth bothers you.
2) Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.

Since this quack fraud is doing nothing "illegal", all you can do is
killfile him. For a day. Until he changes his addy. AGAIN.

Spammin' fer Jesus wrote:

>>Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your postings unread.
>
>
> LOFL! Expect one of two responses, if at all:
>
> 1) Sorry if the truth bothers you.
> 2) Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>
> Since this quack fraud is doing nothing "illegal", all you can do is
> killfile him. For a day. Until he changes his addy. AGAIN.
>

Depends on how you use your filters. I haven't had any problem
eliminating him. Every trolls/spammers who change their addy daily tend
to be consistent on something you can use to filter.

--Charlene


--
Plagiarism: Failure to adorn stolen ideas with footnotes, as opposed to
scholarship, which repeatedly acknowledges the theft. -- Bayan, Rick;
The Cynic's Dictionary, 2002


email perronnelle at earthlink . net

projectile vomit chick wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:19:15 GMT, in rec.food.cooking,
> (Kathy in NZ) hit the crackpipe and declared:
>
>>Please Andrew
>>
>>Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
>>postings unread.
>
>
> Oh yeah....*that's going to do a LOT*.....<----sarcasm


like your nom de net "projectile vomit chick" is in any way 'superior'?

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:04:39 GMT, projectile vomit chick
> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:19:15 GMT, in rec.food.cooking,
>(Kathy in NZ) hit the crackpipe and declared:
>>Please Andrew
>>
>>Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
>>postings unread.
>
>Oh yeah....*that's going to do a LOT*.....<----sarcasm


Well, I haven't seen much from him today, so maybe my polite request
did ............ er............. very little !!

Spammin' fer Jesus wrote:
> >Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your postings unread.
>
> LOFL! Expect one of two responses, if at all:
>
> 1) Sorry if the truth bothers you.
> 2) Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>
> Since this quack fraud is doing nothing "illegal", all you can do is
> killfile him. For a day. Until he changes his addy. AGAIN.

Or hire a thug to smash both of his hands with a bludgeon.
Smash them so thoroughly that he wouldn't even be able to wipe his own
ass.
I wonder if anyone has ever physically assaulted a spammer for their
spamming.
If someone were to be kind enough to give him a few minutes to make
sure that he's in a state of grace, why should he mind that much having
his brains blown out by a high caliber pistol? I mean, he'd be in a
better place, right?
All the kings horses...wait...I know why Humpty Dumpty never got put
back together. He was an egg, right? OK, so you've got something
delicate like an eggshell to repair. You don't let a horse try to do
it. Horses have hooves. The king's men should not have let the horses
"help."

--Bryan

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:13:34 GMT, (Kathy in NZ) wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:04:39 GMT, projectile vomit chick
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:19:15 GMT, in rec.food.cooking,
>>(Kathy in NZ) hit the crackpipe and declared:
>>>Please Andrew
>>>
>>>Could you take your views elsewhere. I am tired of deleting your
>>>postings unread.
>>
>>Oh yeah....*that's going to do a LOT*.....<----sarcasm
>
>
>Well, I haven't seen much from him today, so maybe my polite request
>did ............ er............. very little !!
>


Has anyone else been reading about the nuisance law? It has been
opened to the internet (including usenet?) and resulted in someone
getting a two-year sentence in the pokey for aggravating people with
spam. Something went by me on MSNBC - don;t know if I still have the
link, but will look for it.

Maybe, he's reading the writing on the wall or, more likely, back on
his meds. However, time will tell.


jim