Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys:
I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? Ronnie |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ronnie Rao wrote:
> Guys: > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. Pastorio |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>(Ronnie Rao) writes:
> >I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives >that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? The flavor of tonic is derived primarily from quinine, the sweetness is from sugar (I believe some use non caloric sugar substitute). tonic water [TAHN-ik] Also called quinine water, tonic is water charged with carbon dioxide and flavored with fruit extracts, sugar and usually a tiny amount of quinine (a bitter alkaloid). It's especially popular as a mixer, such as with gin to create the gin and tonic cocktail. © Copyright Barron's Educational Services, Inc. 1995 based on THE FOOD LOVER'S COMPANION, 2nd edition, by Sharon Tyler Herbst. ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob (this one)" wrote:
> > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. > It may not be particularly sweet, but there is sugar in it to counteract the bitterness of the quinine. Tonic water has about the same amount of sugar in it as ginger ale. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PENMART01 wrote:
> > > The flavor of tonic is derived primarily from quinine, the sweetness is from > sugar (I believe some use non caloric sugar substitute). My wife buys sugar free tonic water. Personally, I think it is disgusting. I much prefer a good quality sugar sweetened tonic water with my gin. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob (this one)" > wrote in news:109qvujscqtqi75
@corp.supernews.com: > Ronnie Rao wrote: > >> Guys: >> >> I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives >> that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. > > Pastorio > > While you're absolutely right, Bob, I find that tasting quinine water alone has a very slight underlying sweetness beneath the bitterness. I suppose it differs amongst tasters. Wayne |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message ... > Ronnie Rao wrote: > > > Guys: > > > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. The day I found out that tonic tastes the same whether there's gin in it or not (and btw, my gin of choice was Gordon's) was the day I stopped buying gin and started drinking my tonic straight. Saved myself both money and embarrassment. Gabby |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tonic water and lime is delicious.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Louis Cohen Living la vida loca at N37° 43' 7.9" W122° 8' 42.8" "Gabby" > wrote in message ... > > "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message > ... > > Ronnie Rao wrote: > > > > > Guys: > > > > > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. > > The day I found out that tonic tastes the same whether there's gin in it or > not (and btw, my gin of choice was Gordon's) was the day I stopped buying > gin and started drinking my tonic straight. Saved myself both money and > embarrassment. > > Gabby > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gabby" > wrote in message > The day I found out that tonic tastes the same whether there's gin in it or > not (and btw, my gin of choice was Gordon's) was the day I stopped buying > gin and started drinking my tonic straight. Saved myself both money and > embarrassment. > > Gabby If you can't tell a good gin (Gordon's is not) in the tonic, it is best to save your money. Or you did not put enough in to make a difference. Try Hendricks, or Malacca, or similar and you have a real treat. Be sure to put in enough also. . Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ronnie Rao wrote:
> I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? Tonic water has sugar added, but you can buy whatever kind you want. I find that mixing sugar with alcohol gives me problems (waking up with my heart beating a million miles per hour) so I try to go with low sugar mixed drinks (i.e. diet coke, aspartame may be toxic but not as bad as fructose syrup). -- John Gaughan http://www.johngaughan.net/ |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Gaughan" > wrote in message > Tonic water has sugar added, but you can buy whatever kind you want. I > find that mixing sugar with alcohol gives me problems (waking up with my > heart beating a million miles per hour) so I try to go with low sugar > mixed drinks Sugar helps to give you a stronger hangover also. Better to drink good whiskey with water. Ed |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Dave Smith
> >It may not be particularly sweet, but there is sugar in it to counteract >the bitterness of the quinine. Tonic water has about the same amount of >sugar in it as ginger ale. Tonic/quinine water ("mixer") does indeed contain sugar (except for those made with sugar substitutes). http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/nutrition/smixers.asp ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Gaughan wrote:
> > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > Tonic water has sugar added, but you can buy whatever kind you want. I > find that mixing sugar with alcohol gives me problems (waking up with my > heart beating a million miles per hour) so I try to go with low sugar > mixed drinks (i.e. diet coke, aspartame may be toxic but not as bad as > fructose syrup). I never did enjoy mixed drinks, except for gin and tonic. Rather than buy mix, I spend the money on better quality liquors and drink them straight. Gin is good with a little bit of ice and a twist of lemon. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
... > Ronnie Rao wrote: > > > Guys: > > > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. > > Pastorio > Not correct - tonic water contains quite a bit of sugar. Since quinine is bitter the sugar was added to make the anti-malaria medicine palatable. Then some unsung genius thought to add gin and the rest is history. FYI rum and tonic makes a nice drink too. -- Peter Aitken Remove the crap from my email address before using. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
... > > "Gabby" > wrote in message > > > The day I found out that tonic tastes the same whether there's gin in it > or > > not (and btw, my gin of choice was Gordon's) was the day I stopped buying > > gin and started drinking my tonic straight. Saved myself both money and > > embarrassment. > > > > Gabby > > If you can't tell a good gin (Gordon's is not) in the tonic, it is best to > save your money. Or you did not put enough in to make a difference. Try > Hendricks, or Malacca, or similar and you have a real treat. Be sure to put > in enough also. . > Ed Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should really say "gin for people who don't like gin." -- Peter Aitken Remove the crap from my email address before using. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Dave Smith writes:
> >I never did enjoy mixed drinks, except for gin and tonic. Rather than buy >mix, I spend the money on better quality liquors and drink them straight. >Gin is good with a little bit of ice and a twist of lemon. It's silly, and wasteful, to use good gin to mix with tonic. And anyone who knows anything about good gin knows it's served with a whiff of dry vermouth. ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ronnie Rao wrote: > > Guys: > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > Ronnie It might... American tonic water often has a sweetener in it. But tonic water has quinine. I've been told tonic water is an Anglo-Indian invention to prevent malaria, as quinine is specific for malaria. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > John Gaughan wrote: > > > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > > > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > > > Tonic water has sugar added, but you can buy whatever kind you want. I > > find that mixing sugar with alcohol gives me problems (waking up with my > > heart beating a million miles per hour) so I try to go with low sugar > > mixed drinks (i.e. diet coke, aspartame may be toxic but not as bad as > > fructose syrup). > > I never did enjoy mixed drinks, except for gin and tonic. Rather than buy > mix, I spend the money on better quality liquors and drink them straight. > Gin is good with a little bit of ice and a twist of lemon. I never cared for Gin (or so I thought) until a friend brought over a bottle of Kensington Gin. I asked what we should mix it with and he let me know rather pointedly, that it should be served over ice w/lime. It was so good. Have you heard of this Gin? If so, what do you think of it? Suzan |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>"Orion" writes:
> >>"Dave Smith" wrote: >>> John Gaughan wrote: >>> >>>>I was wondering if tonic gives >>>>that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? >> > >> > Tonic water has sugar added, but you can buy whatever kind you want. >> >> I never did enjoy mixed drinks, except for gin and tonic. Rather than buy >> mix, I spend the money on better quality liquors and drink them straight. >> Gin is good with a little bit of ice and a twist of lemon. > > >I never cared for Gin (or so I thought) until a friend brought over a bottle >of Kensington Gin. I asked what we should mix it with and he let me know >rather pointedly, that it should be served over ice w/lime. It was so good. >Have you heard of this Gin? If so, what do you think of it? "Taste" is subjective. Alphabetical listing of gins: http://www.internetwines.com/spirits-gin.html ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <large snip> I said.................... >I never cared for Gin (or so I thought) until a friend brought over a bottle > >of Kensington Gin. I asked what we should mix it with and he let me know > >rather pointedly, that it should be served over ice w/lime. It was so good. > >Have you heard of this Gin? If so, what do you think of it? Sheldon replied..................... > "Taste" is subjective. > > Alphabetical listing of gins: http://www.internetwines.com/spirits-gin.html > > > > ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- > ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- > ********* > "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." > Sheldon > ```````````` and I agree, yes it is. Have you tried this Gin? What is your opinion of it? Suzan |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>"Orion" SAYS:
>>penmart01 wrote: >> >"Orion" wrote: >> >I never cared for Gin (or so I thought) until a friend brought over a bottle >> >of Kensington Gin. I asked what we should mix it with and he let me know >> >rather pointedly, that it should be served over ice w/lime. It was so >good. >> >Have you heard of this Gin? If so, what do you think of it? > >Sheldon replied..................... >> "Taste" is subjective. >> >> Alphabetical listing of gins: >http://www.internetwines.com/spirits-gin.html > >and I agree, yes it is. Have you tried this Gin? Nope. >What is your opinion of it? From it's fancy schmancyd price and packaging my first thought is it would be nicer on the shelf than in a glass. Why don't you buy a bottle and let us know. For Mar2nis I like Boodles. For collins, tonics, and that ilk Fleischmann gin is fine, any sundry bathtub brew is fine for sweetish cocktails... I mean like what's the point to mixing $30/L gin with say grapefruit juice when the result will be exactly the same had it contained the low priced house label... like dabbing cleavage with Opium Parfum and then a big splash of Jean Nate terlit water. ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> > > Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - > not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into > these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should > really say "gin for people who don't like gin." Sissy gin? I don't think so. Bombay is my favourite gin and Tangery is a close second. Both are much better than Gordons. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PENMART01" > wrote in message ... > >"Orion" SAYS: > >>penmart01 wrote: > >> >"Orion" wrote: > >> >I never cared for Gin (or so I thought) until a friend brought over a > bottle > >> >of Kensington Gin. I asked what we should mix it with and he let me know > >> >rather pointedly, that it should be served over ice w/lime. It was so > >good. > >> >Have you heard of this Gin? If so, what do you think of it? > > > >Sheldon replied..................... > >> "Taste" is subjective. > >> > >> Alphabetical listing of gins: > >http://www.internetwines.com/spirits-gin.html > > > >and I agree, yes it is. Have you tried this Gin? > > Nope. > > >What is your opinion of it? > > From it's fancy schmancyd price and packaging my first thought is it would be > nicer on the shelf than in a glass. Why don't you buy a bottle and let us > know. > > For Mar2nis I like Boodles. For collins, tonics, and that ilk Fleischmann gin > is fine, any sundry bathtub brew is fine for sweetish cocktails... I mean like > what's the point to mixing $30/L gin with say grapefruit juice when the result > will be exactly the same had it contained the low priced house label... like > dabbing cleavage with Opium Parfum and then a big splash of Jean Nate terlit > water. > > > ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- > ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- > ********* > "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." > Sheldon > ```````````` I didn't know about the price as a friend brought the bottle over. Coctails are fine, but I mostly drink straight up. On the rocks sometimes. The only mixed drink that I regularly will drink is a greyhound. Martoonis are okay too, I'll have to try the Boodles. I went to a martini/poker party Friday night and the host served 'apple martinis'. Didn't care for them much. Suzan |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Dave Smith writes:
> >Peter Aitken wrote: >> >> Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - >> not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into >> these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should >> really say "gin for people who don't like gin." > >Sissy gin? I don't think so. Bombay is my favourite gin and Tangery is a close >second. Both are much better than Gordons. "Better", better for what... depends on use... for a mar2ni Bombay may have the edge (if that's someone's subjective taste preference), but for mixer cocktails such as is the topic of this thread (Gin n Tonic) then Gordons is the better choice, both for price and its more intense flavor. To use expensive premium gins for summer mixed quaffs (a gin and tonic is essentially punch) is tantamount to using costly vodkas for bloody marys and caesars. ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> I went to a martini/poker party Friday
>night and the host served 'apple martinis'. > >Suzan Great concept... get your guests zonked and win all the gelt. And as far as apples, they're okay but what I'd call a mere mouthful... me, I prefer at least grapefruit sized... preferably all natural honeydews! ![]() I happen to like mixed melon balls and mixed berries macerated in gin. ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PENMART01 wrote:
> > "Better", better for what... depends on use... for a mar2ni Bombay may have the > edge (if that's someone's subjective taste preference), but for mixer cocktails > such as is the topic of this thread (Gin n Tonic) then Gordons is the better > choice, both for price and its more intense flavor. To use expensive premium > gins for summer mixed quaffs (a gin and tonic is essentially punch) is > tantamount to using costly vodkas for bloody marys and caesars. > I've been wondering what the difference is between good vodka and cheap vodka -- besides $20. Both are supposedly just "neutral grain spirits". I've bought some moderately priced Russian vodka, and it tasted good straight. I stored it in the freezer and drank it in shots. Recently I bought a bottle of cheap vodka, and it's kind of rough. It gets syrupy in the freezer just like the more expensive stuff, but the taste still has an unpleasant edge to it. It's probably just fine for mixing with tonic; I haven't tried it yet. I understand the "get what you pay for" principle, but what is the actual difference? Does the cheap vodka have more higher alcohols in it where the expensive vodka is more purely ethanol (and water)? Best regards, Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PENMART01" > wrote in message ... > > I went to a martini/poker party Friday > >night and the host served 'apple martinis'. > > > >Suzan > > Great concept... get your guests zonked and win all the gelt. And as far as > apples, they're okay but what I'd call a mere mouthful... me, I prefer at least > grapefruit sized... preferably all natural honeydews! ![]() > > I happen to like mixed melon balls and mixed berries macerated in gin. > > > ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- > ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- > ********* > "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." > Sheldon > ```````````` yeah, yeah, yeah... I won $150 in the poker game. Approx. The gin/fruit combo sounds good, maybe with a few sprigs of fresh mint. Time for the beach, bye-bye. Suzan |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zxcvbob > wrote:
> I've been wondering what the difference is between good vodka and cheap > vodka -- besides $20. In principle, none. > Both are supposedly just "neutral grain spirits". > I've bought some moderately priced Russian vodka, and it tasted good > straight. I stored it in the freezer and drank it in shots. Recently I > bought a bottle of cheap vodka, and it's kind of rough. It gets syrupy > in the freezer just like the more expensive stuff, but the taste still > has an unpleasant edge to it. It's probably just fine for mixing with > tonic; I haven't tried it yet. Good vodka is supposed to have no taste at all, it is really 'neutral'. Of course, whatever you do with it, there is still *some* taste left, which is liked by some, disliked by the others. I usually find the cheapest vodka available to be just fine for my rather spicy Bloody Marys. I very rarely drink vodka neat and then it is usually pepper-flavoured vodka. Moskovskaya Osobaya Vodka is the model of what classic Russian vodka is supposed to be. I understand it is not widely marketed in the USA for some reason. I have always detected a lot of unpleasant taste in it. Stolichnaya (made by the same people as Moskovskaya), which is ubiquitous in the USA, is very similar but has some sugar added to it, which makes 'softer' but also renders it not a classic vodka (and the unpleasant taste is still there). The most 'neutral' vodka I have ever tasted was Kremlyovskaya. Drinking pure, unflavoured vodka, i.e. consuming alcohol for its own sake only, is as barbarous as could be, as far as I'm concerned. Still, some occasions, particularly the available food of the Russian of Polish variety - could justify it... maybe... > I understand the "get what you pay for" principle, but what is the > actual difference? Does the cheap vodka have more higher alcohols in it > where the expensive vodka is more purely ethanol (and water)? Good vodka, expensive or not, is supposed to be as free of congeners as possible, particularly of erucic oil. Grain vodka is supposedly much easier to get rid of congeners than potato vodka. The 'cleaner' the vodka, the less hangover it is supposed to cause. Victor |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith > wrote in message
... > Peter Aitken wrote: > > > > > > > Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - > > not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into > > these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should > > really say "gin for people who don't like gin." > > Sissy gin? I don't think so. Bombay is my favourite gin and Tangery is a close > second. Both are much better than Gordons. > BOODLES!!!! AND NO GODDAMN FRUIT!!!! Sorry, I got all excited. Dunty Porteous -- "It tastes like burning..... waaaaa!!!!" -Ralph Wiggum |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ronnie Rao" > wrote in message om... > Guys: > > I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > Ronnie By 'Tonic'. I assume you are referring to quinine water. In different parts of the US, 'tonic' refers to soda in general. Quinine water does have a sweetener, usually sugar. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>"Kswck"
> >"Ronnie Rao" wrote: >> >> I was wondering if tonic gives >> that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > >By 'Tonic'. I assume you are referring to quinine water. In different parts >of the US, 'tonic' refers to soda in general. Tonic can mean a hair application... tonic can mean most anything. M-W [2]tonic noun 1 a : an agent (as a drug) that increases body tone b : one that invigorates, restores, refreshes, or stimulates <a day in the country was a tonic for him> c : a liquid preparation for the scalp or hair d : chiefly New England : a carbonated flavored beverage e : TONIC WATER 2 : the first tone of a diatonic scale : KEYNOTE 3 : a voiced sound --- ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > Peter Aitken wrote: > > > > > > > Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - > > not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into > > these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should > > really say "gin for people who don't like gin." > > Sissy gin? I don't think so. Bombay is my favourite gin and Tangery is a close > second. Both are much better than Gordons. > I have nothng against Tanqueray and Bombay - in fact I like them both. My point is that they are not authentic gin. They both taste like a very pleasant mixed drink that contains gin and various other flavors. Very nice - but not gin any more than a scotch and ginger ale is scotch. Peter Aitken |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zxcvbob > wrote:
>I've been wondering what the difference is between good vodka and cheap >vodka -- besides $20. Flavor. Ostensibly. >Both are supposedly just "neutral grain spirits". Neutral gain spirits distilled to regular market proof. Everclear is undiluted vodka base. Basically, anything fermentable and distillable can be distilled and filtered multiple times to give 95+% alcohol neutral spirits. Add your favorite (or cheapest) water, pay the local revenoors, and you're in the vodka business. As you might guess, the quality of the water used is a huge factor. > I've bought some moderately priced Russian vodka, and it tasted good >straight. There's a formerly (maybe currently) state-brewed vodka called Russian Standard that costs roughly $2/bottle and is reputed to make Stoli taste like cat-****. And there are a *lot* of ridiculously overpriced vodkas from just about everywhere in baroquely decorated bottles that seemed designed to taste like cat-****. >I understand the "get what you pay for" principle, but what is the >actual difference? Does the cheap vodka have more higher alcohols in it >where the expensive vodka is more purely ethanol (and water)? Theoretically, it's the quality of the water and the filtration that do it. Most of them also contain trace flavorings, like good manufactured bottled waters. My favorite is Ketel One, which is technically almost a Jenever (which is technically almost Gin) because it contains the barest hint of juniper berries. But it comes off as buttery and smooth when drunk from the freezer. Almost nobody makes real Potato vodka, and it was never really the biggest source of the stuff anyway. The canonical version of vodka is supposed to be Polish Potato Vodka and the best is supposed to be Luksusowa, but I'm not impressed with it. It's a very clean taste, which to me is almost metallic, and it has more of a bite than I like. --Blair "Some places, even the water tastes good." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Victor Sack wrote: > zxcvbob > wrote: > > >>I've been wondering what the difference is between good vodka and cheap >>vodka -- besides $20. > > > In principle, none. > > >> Both are supposedly just "neutral grain spirits". >> I've bought some moderately priced Russian vodka, and it tasted good >>straight. I stored it in the freezer and drank it in shots. Recently I >>bought a bottle of cheap vodka, and it's kind of rough. It gets syrupy >>in the freezer just like the more expensive stuff, but the taste still >>has an unpleasant edge to it. It's probably just fine for mixing with >>tonic; I haven't tried it yet. > > > Good vodka is supposed to have no taste at all, it is really 'neutral'. > Of course, whatever you do with it, there is still *some* taste left, > which is liked by some, disliked by the others. I usually find the > cheapest vodka available to be just fine for my rather spicy Bloody > Marys. I very rarely drink vodka neat and then it is usually > pepper-flavoured vodka. > > Moskovskaya Osobaya Vodka is the model of what classic Russian vodka is > supposed to be. I understand it is not widely marketed in the USA for > some reason. I have always detected a lot of unpleasant taste in it. > Stolichnaya (made by the same people as Moskovskaya), which is > ubiquitous in the USA, is very similar but has some sugar added to it, > which makes 'softer' but also renders it not a classic vodka (and the > unpleasant taste is still there). The most 'neutral' vodka I have ever > tasted was Kremlyovskaya. > > Drinking pure, unflavoured vodka, i.e. consuming alcohol for its own > sake only, is as barbarous as could be, as far as I'm concerned. Still, > some occasions, particularly the available food of the Russian of Polish > variety - could justify it... maybe... > > >>I understand the "get what you pay for" principle, but what is the >>actual difference? Does the cheap vodka have more higher alcohols in it >>where the expensive vodka is more purely ethanol (and water)? > > > Good vodka, expensive or not, is supposed to be as free of congeners as > possible, particularly of erucic oil. Grain vodka is supposedly much > easier to get rid of congeners than potato vodka. The 'cleaner' the > vodka, the less hangover it is supposed to cause. > > Victor OTHOH, your dissertation not withstanding, I prefer a cold vodka along with my caviar. And the better it is, the less likely there to be any taste that would interfere with the caviar. -- Alan "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion, and avoid the people, you might better stay home." --James Michener |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 May 2004 23:40:09 +0200, Victor Sack wrote:
> zxcvbob > wrote: > >> I've been wondering what the difference is between good vodka and cheap >> vodka -- besides $20. > > In principle, none. > >> Both are supposedly just "neutral grain spirits". >> I've bought some moderately priced Russian vodka, and it tasted good >> straight. I stored it in the freezer and drank it in shots. Recently I >> bought a bottle of cheap vodka, and it's kind of rough. It gets syrupy >> in the freezer just like the more expensive stuff, but the taste still >> has an unpleasant edge to it. It's probably just fine for mixing with >> tonic; I haven't tried it yet. > > Good vodka is supposed to have no taste at all, it is really 'neutral'. > Of course, whatever you do with it, there is still *some* taste left, > which is liked by some, disliked by the others. I usually find the > cheapest vodka available to be just fine for my rather spicy Bloody > Marys. I very rarely drink vodka neat and then it is usually > pepper-flavoured vodka. > > Moskovskaya Osobaya Vodka is the model of what classic Russian vodka is > supposed to be. I understand it is not widely marketed in the USA for > some reason. I have always detected a lot of unpleasant taste in it. > Stolichnaya (made by the same people as Moskovskaya), which is > ubiquitous in the USA, is very similar but has some sugar added to it, > which makes 'softer' but also renders it not a classic vodka (and the > unpleasant taste is still there). The most 'neutral' vodka I have ever > tasted was Kremlyovskaya. > > Drinking pure, unflavoured vodka, i.e. consuming alcohol for its own > sake only, is as barbarous as could be, as far as I'm concerned. Still, > some occasions, particularly the available food of the Russian of Polish > variety - could justify it... maybe... > >> I understand the "get what you pay for" principle, but what is the >> actual difference? Does the cheap vodka have more higher alcohols in it >> where the expensive vodka is more purely ethanol (and water)? > > Good vodka, expensive or not, is supposed to be as free of congeners as > possible, particularly of erucic oil. Grain vodka is supposedly much > easier to get rid of congeners than potato vodka. The 'cleaner' the > vodka, the less hangover it is supposed to cause. > > Victor I don't know what Vodka is supposed to taste like, but in Europe Vodka tastes a whole lot like Gin and is a bunch better than the Vodka in the US. I have no desire to ge to Russia to try Vodka, there are too many places more interesting for me to visit. -- JakeInHartsel Food, The Art Form that You Can Eat |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victor Sack wrote:
> > Drinking pure, unflavoured vodka, i.e. consuming alcohol for its own > sake only, is as barbarous as could be, as far as I'm concerned. Still, > some occasions, particularly the available food of the Russian of Polish > variety - could justify it... maybe... > The previous bottle of good vodka was smooth and had very little taste except ethanol. Shots, poured straight out of the deep freezer, tasted very good with hot garlicky peppery shrimp. Mmmmm. (I don't remember the brand; it was in an obnoxiously tall bottle that didn't fit on shelves well, and the top of the bottle was shaped kind of like the onion dome of a Russian Orthodox church) The cheap American vodka is wretched as shots, but it mixes well. -Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 May 2004 01:35:23 GMT, Wayne >
wrote: > "Bob (this one)" > wrote in news:109qvujscqtqi75 > @corp.supernews.com: > > > Ronnie Rao wrote: > > > >> Guys: > >> > >> I might sound a little dumb here, but I was wondering if tonic gives > >> that sweetness to Gin and Tonic? > > > > There's no sweetness in tonic that I've ever noticed. It's quinine > > water, which is very bitter. The gin was added to make taking medicine > > palatable. Quinine is a specific for malaria. > > > > Pastorio > > > > > > While you're absolutely right, Bob, I find that tasting quinine water alone > has a very slight underlying sweetness beneath the bitterness. I suppose > it differs amongst tasters. > > Wayne Is that a bad thing? Doesn't everyone put lemon in it? I like that sweet/sour taste! Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 May 2004 15:51:18 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
> wrote: > > Gordon's is actually a very good gin. It is gin as gin is supposed to be - > not super-refined and with a touch of roughness to it. I refuse to buy into > these "sissy" overpriced gins like Tanqueray and Bombay whose ads should > really say "gin for people who don't like gin." What do you think of Beefeaters? It was the first gin/tonic I ever had and I still like it. Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Celery Tonic | General Cooking | |||
REC: Tonic water syrup | General Cooking | |||
Q Tonic | General Cooking | |||
Homemade Tonic Water | General Cooking | |||
quinine in tonic water | General Cooking |