Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Origins of this newsgroup and other online food fora
Max Hauser, June 2005 Here is some early history per Victor Sack's requests. "Concise summary" is in the following paragraph. I've included further personal recollections, and [Notes] at the end, and done considerable fact-checking, correcting some details mentioned elsewhere only from memory. This note draws on archives that supplement the current groups.google.com data base (explicitly incomplete for rec.* newsgroups, especially from about 1987 into the 1990s, when utzoo was not archiving them). Other smaller archives may have this material, because newsgroup messages are broadcast and anyone can archive them. (I was introduced to the Internet in the 1970s by the way, but used it steadily from 1980, also reading newsgroups. In the 1980s I set up an Internet mailing list for wine enthusiasts and a wine newsgroup, both again partly archived offline.) rec.food.cooking began as net.cooks, launched by friend and fellow food fanatic Steve Upstill in Berkeley in January 1982 with a posting on pragmatic pasta sauces, something Steve was then often cooking, including at my place [Note 1]. We were all cranking out a lot of fresh ribbon pasta with Atlas 150 (150mm) roller/cutter machines and we needed things to do with it. net.cooks became rec.food.cooking in the general Great Renaming (late 1986). Current Google archives show Steve's original 29-Jan-82 posting, and also his 31-Jan-82 net.general announcement of net.cooks, "All about food, cooking, cookbooks, recipes and other alimentary effluvia." That was the "charter" of this newsgroup. (Discussions by the way using the specific language of newsgroup "charter" on net.cooks or rec.food.cooking don't appear until five years later in 1987, an exchange between Terry Sterkel, me, and Spafford, referring anyway to a different newsgroup.) Posted statistics also showed that net.cooks became popular immediately, one of the most popular newsgroups at the time. After the 1986 renaming, a Gene Spafford active-newsgroups list included rec.food.cooking with summary "Food, cooking, cookbooks, and recipes." Steve Upstill continued to contribute occasionally, and also to work on recipe-formatting software. I recall him commercializing a typesetting macro package ("-MU"), and recipe software for Mac platforms. Recipes and how to handle them were early frequent discussion topics. Steve Upstill and others had a general idea that the newsgroup itself would be an online recipe data base. (I remember a loose-leaf binder gradually filling with printed pages; I also kept recipes, selectively.) Demand for typesettable recipes transmittable as text-only files led to Brian Reid in 1985 starting an associated moderated newsgroup mod.recipes, using the Bell Labs troff formatting commands then popular in the Internet software world. (Pronounced "tee-roff," roff being short for runoff.) Brian Reid was an architect of the newsgroup system, and by the late 1980s was recognized as online cook laureate. The "alt" or alternative newsgroups (outside the core group that backbone sites automatically carried) were begun by Brian in 1987, mainly to accommodate an exception to the Great Renaming scheme for his recipe newsgroup mod.recipes, which became alt.gourmand [Note 2]. The tone of net.cooks and rec.food.cooking in early years was often constructive. If someone saw a technique suggestion and knew a better one, they'd follow up showing the better one. If highly civilized, they'd keep digs and flames to email -- net etiquette since 1982, later in RFC1855. Thus Steve Upstill told me plainly in 1983 what he thought of my opinion on garlic presses, but he did so by email. I confess now that in 1988 I got a little impatient with a posting declaring curtly "In classical French cuisine, roux is *never* allowed to brown." This seemed to contradict the _Guide Culinaire_ (supposed to have something to do with "classical French cuisine") and its standard roux recipes (Brown -- the main one -- Blond, and White) [Note 3]. So I responded excerpting specifics, and some trivia from the same source (roux was popularized in French cooking by Spanish cooks with Anne of Austria, hence the name "Espagnole" for brown sauce). Mark Theodoropoulos (from the WELL) added etymology of "roux" (russet or red-brown), and I followed with banter about "classical" (look, the guy was quoting the AHD at me), and shared a quip I got from an employee at a graduate-school bookstore about 1982: "Do you sell [English] usage guides -- Fowler, etc. -- in this bookstore?" "No. Since our students are mostly graduate humanities scholars, our feeling is that they either own such references already, or never will." Frustration existed over dross levels in newsgroups even 20 years ago. Mike Turner observed to me in 1984 an exodus of good contributors from some newsgroups to moderated Internet mailing lists. Brian Reid advocated moderated newsgroups. The evolution of Web-site food fora has tended to support his argument, in that successful ones generally are lightly moderated. In 1988 I (facetiously) posted a proposal refining RFC's name to reflect then-current repetitive topics: rec.food.cooking -> rec.helpless.bachelors OR rec.bisquick (snappier) Content shifted over time, of course. Newsgroup participation grew rapidly over the 1980s. The adjective "public-access" was already conspicuous on newsgroups in 1984-1985 with the rise of commercial public-access sites. Since about 1985, people in the US and some other countries have demonstrably had access to email and newsgroups if they wanted them (and if they had a telephone and a computer, or even a dumb terminal). 117,000 newsgroup postings in 1987 increased tenfold by 1990 in the Google Groups Archive Information summary, http://tinyurl.com/47frr . This and other data suggest hundreds of thousands of people using them by 1990, though the numbers would grow much more. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, retail ISP business was evolving from scattered ad-hoc independents toward large firms with beginner-friendly interfaces. Some of these large firms offered to their subscribers online fora resembling the existing newsgroups, but isolated from them. Consequently, important private online communities grew separately. Private fora are restricted to customers of the hosting ISP firm, a situation fundamentally different from newsgroups (or public Web sites). Eventually, from 1993, certain large ISPs began adding newsgroup access (with consequences for the newsgroups too, sometimes called Eternal September). On the subject of wine, newsgroup archives show members of private ISP fora spilling into the newsgroups in the middle and late 1990s and mentioning existing private fora. Squires, Garr, Meadows, and Harrington, all later conspicuous Web-site wine-forum hosts, were active on newsgroups in this period. As of 1994, when Bennett Falk published his bestselling _Internet Roadmap,_ the HTTP tools (hyperlinks, search engines, the new WWW language) were only one chapter of many, the other chapters treating better-known Internet tools (ftp, telnet, Gopher, etc.) [Note 4]. The 1995 Internet reference document RFC1855 shows the same picture. Already by 1993 though, Mosaic had introduced practical Web browsing, and it took off, bringing vast new capabilities and participation. By 1994 at least one HTTP food-discussion forum was thriving, the [San Francisco] Bay Area Restaurant Guide (BARG), listing most of the region's restaurants and accumulating comments. This was an initiative of Stanford graduate student Andrew Conru. Expansion versions were announced for other regions; BARG was a pioneering tool. But lacking enough maintenance, its data base degenerated and it vanished (with its content), illustrating the impermanence problem. In 1997, chowhound.com appeared on a similar mission, with a distinct format. Some later and wider-chartered food-discussion sites currently active, such as egullet.org and mouthfulsfood.com, or their users, trace their activities partly to Chowhound. As far as I currently know, rec.food.cooking (formerly net.cooks) is the oldest public food-discussion forum online, predating BARG by 12 years and Chowhound by 15 years (though of course distinct in focus). Noteworthy also is that with all of their other capabilities, Web-site fora still communicate mainly with text, using customs and jargon established on early newsgroups, including net.cooks. Notes: Note on Message IDs. Newsgroup messages (like email messages) traditionally are identified by Message IDs in the form <xxx @ yyy>, a format at least 25 years old. The Message ID is plain text, not a hyperlink. However, recent popular personal-computer software may force text with @ to display as a hyperlink. groups.google.com circumvented this issue in some indexing, via the character code %40 for @ , though current newer "beta" version of their software hides some of this. Google's archive also doesn't currently accept the %40 in searches. In addition, original Message IDs cited in my postings lately display on Google partly masked off, as if email addresses needing protection from spam. [Note 1] Incessant flux of people from far away stimulated the local food scene. Then and for years after, the regional restaurant that was "impossible" to get into, with telephone reservations opening and closing long in advance to the tune of busy signals, was Alice Waters's Chez Panisse (downstairs) in the neighborhood where I grew up. Specialty food retailers moved in nearby, a fashionable "gourmet ghetto," ironically replacing creditable older businesses such as the Pantry Shelf delicatessen. (Some results were embarrassingly precious: a very expensive dense chocolate cake in the shape of El Salvador, labeled "Revolution Torte." Poor Marie Antoinette.) Alice Kahn would shortly publish her 1982 parody essay "Yuppie!" in the _East Bay Express,_ coining a word others quickly exploited (quicker, sometimes, than they credited Kahn where due). I thought the essay so good and timely that I kept a stack of originals. (It's available with minor edits in ISBN 0898151481 via your favorite online used bookseller). In nearby Albany, wine importer Kermit Lynch sought out and popularized good-value labels such as Billecart-Salmon, and Harvey Steiman had just published (October 1981) his article "Merlot: The coming red wine revolution" that helped tell Americans to drink Merlot-based domestic wines, just as a recent film has now told them not to. [Note 2] A 2004 summary of the alt-newsgroup history with more links and anecdotes is in Message > , currently archived at http://tinyurl.com/2rf29 [Note 3] These are Recipes 13-15, Escoffier's fourth edition (1921) in Cracknell and Kaufmann's English translation. Which by the way recommends clarified butter for its higher temperature capability, meeting another objection in the original posting. The exchange summarized above on "roux" appeared in the following Messages: > > > > > [Note 4] Bennett Falk's book went to three editions and a dozen languages, and perhaps interestingly, some non-English versions still sell well in places where the older tools are still popular. Bennett was formerly Unix columnist at _MicroTimes_ (and also, incidentally, a humanities scholar). |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 03:14:47 -0700, "Max Hauser"
> wrote: >Origins of this newsgroup and other online food fora > >Max Hauser, June 2005 > > >Here is some early history per Victor Sack's requests. "Concise summary" is >in the following paragraph. I've included further personal recollections, >and [Notes] at the end, and done considerable fact-checking, correcting some >details mentioned elsewhere only from memory. This note draws on archives Thank you for the history and personal details (and Victor for requesting the history). This is the type of information that should be documented. Sue(tm) Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Max Hauser > wrote:
> Here is some early history per Victor Sack's requests. "Concise summary" is > in the following paragraph. Thanks a lot, Max! Very interesting details, indeed! Some of them will surely find their way into the FAQ sooner or later. Victor |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Origins of Food Science? | General Cooking | |||
Rec.Food.Recipes Newsgroup | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Origins of this newsgroup in a nutshell | Wine | |||
Speculation on Food Origins | General Cooking | |||
German Food Newsgroup? | General Cooking |