Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
"The Great Divide...."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entert...chi-friday-hed
FOOD AND WHINE The great divide Going out with a group is great until it's time to pay up. We asked experts how to solve that dining dilemma: Splitting the check By Monica Eng Tribune staff reporter April 30, 2004 Once a month, in the bottom left-hand corner of this page, we get to vent spleen and share tasty tips on a variety of vexing dining topics. But some issues are so thorny that they can't be handled in a few paragraphs. One of the thorniest: splitting the check. We've all had that awkward moment at the end of a group meal when the check hits the table with a quiet thud and no one wants to touch it because they know that a) it's going to involve math and b) its going to mean making some touchy decisions for the rest of the group. Some people insist on always splitting evenly; others like to calculate who owes what down to the penny. Still others, like some Venezuelan friends of mine, are horrified at the idea that anyone would "haggle over money" at the dinner table. "Someone just quietly takes care of it and if there is money to be repaid, we can talk about it later outside of the restaurant," my friend tells me. Since this issue can be so complex, we decided to ask etiquette experts, diners and waiters for their views on the subject. While they didn't agree, most did conclude that common sense should prevail. First, we consulted Jeanne Hamilton, creator of EtiquetteHell.com, a Web site that navigates the world of good and bad manners. She helped guide us through the many rings of the check splitting purgatory. When to split the restaurant check evenly: "If, how and when the check is split is dependent on the relationships of the diners to each other or the event being celebrated," Hamilton says. "Co-workers treating the secretary to lunch for Secretary's Day or having a going-away dinner for a departing colleague should evenly split the bill, making sure to cover the cost of the honoree's meal." When the contributions should differ: "I would call this appealing to others' sense of fairness," Hamilton says. "It simply isn't fair to have the light eaters subsidizing the huge appetites of more robust eaters. If you know you enjoy a 16-ounce prime rib, either deny yourself or restrain yourself in group dining situations so that the expense of your culinary extremes is not equally shared by your dining companions. You can always enjoy that prime rib later with no guilt feelings. "Lightweight eaters may discover that confronting a meal pig has the potential of flopping flat as a crepe. In those situations, whining repetitively is more damaging to your reputation than forking over more cash than you anticipated spending or think is fair given how much you ate. Suck it up, pay your share and then resolve to never, ever get yourself into one of these dining wealth redistribution schemes again." When to have separate checks: "When it is mutually agreed upon by all diners," Hamilton says. "Sometimes separate checks makes life so darn easy for everyone." But we should note that this doesn't make it easier for waiters--especially when your party is larger than four people. When to just pay the whole thing yourself: "Anytime you issue an invitation for someone to dine with you, they will have an expectation that you are treating," she says. "[Also,] when you know that disagreement over the bill may cause embarrassment to others. Sometimes it's just kind to shell out some extra money for the preservation of relationships. When professional courtesy dictates it . . . such as a salesman trying to land an account who takes a prospective client to lunch. [Or when] you want to bless a friend who you know will someday reciprocate in kind for you, too." How many times to insist on paying yourself when someone else volunteers to pay: Hamilton says: "Once. If they decline the offer, express appreciation for the meal and their very kind offer to treat you to dinner. And be sure to write a thank-you note and mail it immediately upon coming home." Hamilton's expert advice covers a lot of ground, but readers also wrote in with their two cents. Ken Catalanotte of Chicago belongs to a dining club, but he says they have never confronted the issue, and he thinks it's time they did: "Most of us have one entree, a drink or two, [but] some have much more. To be honest, I don't think it's fair to split the cost [evenly]. If you have way more than everybody else, then you need to put in more money or have a separate tab. . .. . Maybe that makes me impolite, but I'm being honest." Karen Kennedy of La Grange was a server in the Chicago area for more than a decade but is now just an avid diner. She has a different view: "When out with large parties, we split the bill evenly among all of us because when it comes down to it, the variances are typically so small (usually under $5 per person). Even when considering those who imbibe and those who partake of desserts, or not, it's ridiculous to expend the energy to split things on a more precise basis." Joyce Oakal of Elmhurst notes that it makes it easier to collectively pay a fellow diner who charges the whole thing rather than ask for separate change from the server: "We go out with friends on a regular basis. One person takes the check at the end of the meal and divides it evenly either per couple or per person. Usually that person charges the whole tab and we all pay him. ... It's too petty to worry about whether someone had an extra drink or dessert." Peter Tyksins of Chicago, who regularly sups with a half-Japanese and half-American group of diners, writes of navigating potential cultural landmines and solving the tricky tip issue with clear rules and one "hard guy or gal": "It's always fun (!) when the bill comes. As you probably know, the Japanese are in the habit of dividing the bill equally based on the number of diners and regardless of who ate what. The Americans detest this practice. After a rocky start (and coming up short on a couple of bills), we've adopted the American method of paying for what you've ordered--and adding a 20 percent tip. One must step gingerly when another orders a $15 entree, drinks the table's beer, and then kicks in a deficient $20. But I think it's important that somebody play the hard guy or gal and remind everybody to kick in extra for the tip." So it seems that the bottom line is that you have to read the group. If you are dining with your siblings, you can feel freer to ask your martini- and lobster-loving brother to cough up a few extra bucks at the end of the meal. But when you are out with colleagues, it is often better to be polite and discreet and sometimes eat the extra charge. In any case, clear rules, a sense of fairness and at least one person at the table with a good grasp of division and percentages can really help things. And don't forget to tip your waitress! ---------- Copyright © 2004, Chicago Tribune ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Maximize the Racial Divide | General Cooking | |||
Jewish Admission: Mass Immigration Used to Divide & Conquer | General Cooking | |||
Great Divide Old Ruffian | Beer | |||
Great Divide Old Ruffian | Beer | |||
Divide Pro 3-in-1 fry pans | General Cooking |