On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:49:58p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:10:20p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>
>>>I guess the yolk's on you then, cuz nobody else wants to play.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Is it an egg?
>>>
>>>How about sliced almonds?
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Bob
>>>
>>
>>
>> Why not just ignore this twirp who likes to insult people and raise
>> idiotic issues? It's clearly not worth the bandwidth.
>>
>
>
> 1) I have *lots* of bandwidth.
>
> 2) I was bored.
>
> 3) I like trying to post in different styles and to be able to converse
> with anybody -- including half-wits who like to ask inane questions.
> Sometimes it's fun to try to get the inane question thread to quickly
> topic-drift into something interesting (that was not the case this time,
> but it was about a week ago.)
>
> 4) I thought it would **** people off just a little -- especially with
> that cascade thing we had going with no trimming so that the S/N ratio
> approached zero. Sort of a canonical bad example. ;-) I figure anyone
> who was *really* ****ed about it killed the thread a long time ago.
>
> Thanks for asking,
> Bob

LOL. Understood. It didn't particularly **** me off. Your level of
involvement in it just seem somehow out of character for you. What did
**** me off was his insulting reponses to others in other threads.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Eastbound and down, loaded up and truckin', we're gonna do what they say
can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
I'm eastbound, just watch ol' "Wayne Boatwright" run.

>On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:49:58p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>> On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:10:20p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I guess the yolk's on you then, cuz nobody else wants to play.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is it an egg?
>>>>
>>>>How about sliced almonds?
>>>>
>>>>Best regards,
>>>>Bob
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why not just ignore this twirp who likes to insult people and raise
>>> idiotic issues? It's clearly not worth the bandwidth.
>>>
>>
>>
>> 1) I have *lots* of bandwidth.
>>
>> 2) I was bored.
>>
>> 3) I like trying to post in different styles and to be able to converse
>> with anybody -- including half-wits who like to ask inane questions.
>> Sometimes it's fun to try to get the inane question thread to quickly
>> topic-drift into something interesting (that was not the case this time,
>> but it was about a week ago.)
>>
>> 4) I thought it would **** people off just a little -- especially with
>> that cascade thing we had going with no trimming so that the S/N ratio
>> approached zero. Sort of a canonical bad example. ;-) I figure anyone
>> who was *really* ****ed about it killed the thread a long time ago.
>>
>> Thanks for asking,
>> Bob
>
>LOL. Understood. It didn't particularly **** me off. Your level of
>involvement in it just seem somehow out of character for you. What did
>**** me off was his insulting reponses to others in other threads.


Bob,

Don't worry about him. I think he's just jealous that you guessed right
and he didn't.

On Wed 27 Apr 2005 11:48:09p, Wavy G wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Eastbound and down, loaded up and truckin', we're gonna do what they say
> can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
> I'm eastbound, just watch ol' "Wayne Boatwright" run.
>
>>On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:49:58p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>> On Wed 27 Apr 2005 09:10:20p, zxcvbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I guess the yolk's on you then, cuz nobody else wants to play.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Is it an egg?
>>>>>
>>>>>How about sliced almonds?
>>>>>
>>>>>Best regards,
>>>>>Bob
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why not just ignore this twirp who likes to insult people and raise
>>>> idiotic issues? It's clearly not worth the bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) I have *lots* of bandwidth.
>>>
>>> 2) I was bored.
>>>
>>> 3) I like trying to post in different styles and to be able to
>>> converse with anybody -- including half-wits who like to ask inane
>>> questions. Sometimes it's fun to try to get the inane question thread
>>> to quickly topic-drift into something interesting (that was not the
>>> case this time, but it was about a week ago.)
>>>
>>> 4) I thought it would **** people off just a little -- especially with
>>> that cascade thing we had going with no trimming so that the S/N ratio
>>> approached zero. Sort of a canonical bad example. ;-) I figure
>>> anyone who was *really* ****ed about it killed the thread a long time
>>> ago.
>>>
>>> Thanks for asking,
>>> Bob
>>
>>LOL. Understood. It didn't particularly **** me off. Your level of
>>involvement in it just seem somehow out of character for you. What did
>>**** me off was his insulting reponses to others in other threads.
>
>
> Bob,
>
> Don't worry about him. I think he's just jealous that you guessed right
> and he didn't.
>

He doesn't have to worry about me. I wasn't playing you silly game and I
didn't make any guesses. I just plain didn't care.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974