Alternate Identity > wrote:

>Guys,
>
>As goofy (and sometimes nasty) as Sheldon gets, this sounds a bit out of
>character even for him.
>
>I've been "cyberstalked" before and had my ID faked by a Cyber-imitator
>ass hole.
>
>I'm thinking that this is not being posted by Sheldon.
>
>At least I hope not. :-(
>
>This is too ugly even for him???
I hope you're right - I really do, but the headers look OK to me. Who
knows? I'm sorry I managed to get him so riled up, but it's too late
to worry about it now - I let it go, but it's apparently going to be
difficult for him.

AlleyGator wrote:
>
> I'm sorry I managed to get him so riled up, but it's too late
> to worry about it now - I let it go, but it's apparently going to be
> difficult for him.

You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
rage. He'll get over it.

Carol

"Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote:

>You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
>rage. He'll get over it.
>
>Carol

Well, I think it was me being stupid enough to get involved in the
crossposting that caused the whole problem in the first place.
I gotta quit doing that.

I just don't get it. I do not and will never understand why anyone on
r.f.c. makes allowances for Sheldon or thinks he has even one remotely
redeeming quality that can justify this type of behavior towards other
people.

Albeit under other nom de plume, I have been posting on r.f.c. since
Feburary, 1996, and have been reading the group even longer. Sheldon's
behavior, except perhaps to worsen, has not changed one bit since the first
day I read posts here.

Whatever food-related knowledge he does or does not have (I find much of it
suspicious and debatable), there is nothing he could contribute that could
possibly justfiy his vicious and vile behavior. I have never, in my sixty
years, heard anyone use such vile and filthy language or make such vehement
attacks. If he did this in a public place, he could easily be arrested and
jailed for such behavior.

Why r.f.c.'ers continue to allow (through supportive statements) Sheldon's
behavior is a complete mystery, yet let anyone else get remotely out of
line and the whole group is ready to tear them apart.

As I said, I just don't get it and I guess I never will, but Sheldon would
be best ignored by everyone here.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

D'Wayne Bullshit wrote:
> I just don't get it. I do not and will never understand why anyone
on
> r.f.c. makes allowances for Sheldon or thinks he has even one
remotely
> redeeming quality that can justify this type of behavior towards
other
> people.

Snakes are not people.

> Albeit under other nom de plume, I have been posting on r.f.c. since
> Feburary, 1996, and have been reading the group even longer.


Lying piece of shit... at least 50 other little twerps have claimed
precisely the same... U R a NEWBIE[period]


> I just don't get it and I guess I never will.

Low IQ *******.

> Sheldon would be best ignored by everyone here.

WORST kind of _COWARD_ resorts to enlisting others to wage his battles.

_COWARDLY_ MOTHER****ING 'D'WAYNE BULLSHIT', MAY THE GODS OF TERMINAL
ILLNESS VISIT THEIR WRATH UPON YOU AND YOURS.

Main Entry: moth=B7er=B7****=B7er
Pronunciation: 'm&-th&r-"f&-k&r
Function: noun
Date: 1952
usually obscene : one that is contemptible, or offensive - usually
used as a generalized term of abuse
- moth=B7er=B7****=B7ing /-ki[ng]/ adjective usually obscene :

Pronunciation Key

=A9 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
---

Sheldon

AlleyGator wrote:
> "Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote:
>
>
>>You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
>>rage. He'll get over it.
>>
>>Carol
>
>
> Well, I think it was me being stupid enough to get involved in the
> crossposting that caused the whole problem in the first place.
> I gotta quit doing that.

Right. Crossposting annoys everyone. I wish Pastorio and Chung would
both drop off the face of the planet when they crosspost. I hadn't
actually seen you do it but at least you admit your mistake. Now go
stand in the corner as penance, lol.
Goomba

On Sun 01 May 2005 02:38:20a, Damsel in dis Dress wrote in
rec.food.cooking:

> AlleyGator wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry I managed to get him so riled up, but it's too late
>> to worry about it now - I let it go, but it's apparently going to be
>> difficult for him.
>
> You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
> rage. He'll get over it.
>
> Carol

Carol,

What does it matter what got him riled up or whether or not he'll get over
it. There is nothing on earth that excuses this man's behavior, absolutely
nothing! He is crude, vile, and vicious, and he takes great pleasure in
it. I'm sure he's also taking great pleasure in this continued string of
comments.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On 30 Apr 2005 20:38:42 -0700, Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> Hi sf,
>
> For me, it's much easier to just hit refresh from time to time and
> check in on this one thread. I don't have the patience right now to
> sift through all the posts looking for something that interests me.

You're being penny wise and pound foolish! I flag the threads I want
to watch (the pair of glasses) or lock them (the padlock) for those
days I'm too pressed for time. It sounds like you need to use the
padlock and delete all the other posts right now. It takes 5 seconds
to do and you won't have to wait while Agent sifts through 150,000 old
posts, just to get to the past 2 days - when you decide to
resubscribe.

> The volume in RFC is just too high.

It's not that bad, if you know how to use your alt & ctrl buttons to
select and deltete posts.

> And then there's Chung.
>
He doesn't hide, so it's easy enough to select his posts and hit the
delete button w/o reading any. You could even set up a filter for him
if he bothers you that much. Frankly, I don't have ONE SINGLE filter
set up because I'm not tempted to read posts I know will annoy me...
like Chung's. However, if we're ever bombed (which happened a few
years ago) - I have my filtering capability ready to go.

My best to Crash and you - it's a long row to hoe. The same thing
happened to a friend of mine a few years ago. She went to the doctor
thinking it was arthritis and found out her hip bone was dying.

On Sun, 01 May 2005 11:04:18 GMT, AlleyGator wrote:

> "Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote:
>
> >You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
> >rage. He'll get over it.
> >
> >Carol
>
> Well, I think it was me being stupid enough to get involved in the
> crossposting that caused the whole problem in the first place.
> I gotta quit doing that.

Upgrade your version of Agent! Even the newest FA will warn you when
you are about to crosspost.... I just let Agent v2 go Free because the
only feature I used besides the newsreader was spellcheck.

Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Sun 01 May 2005 02:38:20a, Damsel in dis Dress wrote in
> rec.food.cooking:
>
> > AlleyGator wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sorry I managed to get him so riled up, but it's too late
> >> to worry about it now - I let it go, but it's apparently going to
be
> >> difficult for him.
> >
> > You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
> > rage. He'll get over it.
> >
> > Carol
>
> Carol,
>
> What does it matter what got him riled up or whether or not he'll get
over
> it. There is nothing on earth that excuses this man's behavior,
absolutely
> nothing! He is crude, vile, and vicious, and he takes great pleasure
in
> it. I'm sure he's also taking great pleasure in this continued
string of
> comments.

It matters to Gator. He was thinking that he somehow caused the wrath
that's occured in this thread. I was trying to reassure him that it
was just Sheldon, going insane.

Anyway, this thread is no longer serving its intended purpose, so this
is the last you'll see of me here.

Huggles,
Carol

On 1 May 2005 14:12:44 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> I have been posting on r.f.c. since
> Feburary, 1996, and have been reading the group even longer. Sheldon's
> behavior, except perhaps to worsen, has not changed one bit since the first
> day I read posts here.

I watched him change in rfc from a very nice and helpful guy (just
plain Penmart - no 10) into someone who would be considered dangerous
behind a steering wheel.

I still know the "other" Sheldon and he is my friend.

On 1 May 2005 14:12:44 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> As I said, I just don't get it and I guess I never will, but Sheldon would
> be best ignored by everyone here.

PS: If you use Agent in paid mode...
control-k, paste author (click on desired actions)

I agree with Goomba38 when he says: I wish Pastorio and Chung would
both drop off the face of the planet when they crosspost.

I agree. I have nothing against Christians and their good intentions,
but keep it to the right NG. I can understand why Sheldon lost it, in a
way....

Cheers

Cathy

On Sun 01 May 2005 08:27:18a, sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 1 May 2005 14:12:44 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> I have been posting on r.f.c. since
>> Feburary, 1996, and have been reading the group even longer.
>> Sheldon's behavior, except perhaps to worsen, has not changed one bit
>> since the first day I read posts here.
>
> I watched him change in rfc from a very nice and helpful guy (just
> plain Penmart - no 10) into someone who would be considered dangerous
> behind a steering wheel.
>
> I still know the "other" Sheldon and he is my friend.

Then you might suggest to your "friend" that his behavior here is totally
unacceptable.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Sun 01 May 2005 08:45:48a, Dog3 wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> (AlleyGator) wrote in
> :
>
>> "Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote:
>>
>>>You didn't get him riled up. Chung did. This was just spill-over
>>>rage. He'll get over it.
>>>
>>>Carol
>>
>> Well, I think it was me being stupid enough to get involved in the
>> crossposting that caused the whole problem in the first place.
>> I gotta quit doing that.
>
> My newsreader Xnews allows me to kf crossposted threads. I never see
> them. I find them annoying and I am too often lured into a flame war
> when reading them.
>
> Michael
>

I also use Xnews and I also eliminate all crossposted threads, as well as
assorted subjects and posters in my score file that I want to permanently
eliminate; e.g., Sheldon. LOL, would that it truly "eliminated" them! I
reserve the kill(plonk) file for temporary use, as a day count can be set for
each entry.

Now I'm working on a button for my dash that would blast the offending
vehicle in front of me to hell and gone.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Sun 01 May 2005 09:05:18a, sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 1 May 2005 14:12:44 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> As I said, I just don't get it and I guess I never will, but Sheldon
>> would be best ignored by everyone here.
>
> PS: If you use Agent in paid mode...
> control-k, paste author (click on desired actions)

I don't need Agent to do that. Sheldon is in my score file in Xnews, which
permanent prevents any of his originating posts, or posts with his name in
the subject, from ever appearing in my list of posts. The only time I happen
to see something that he writes is when it's contained in quoted text in
someone else's post.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Wayne Boatwright > wrote:

>I also use Xnews and I also eliminate all crossposted threads, as well as
>assorted subjects and posters in my score file that I want to permanently
>eliminate; e.g., Sheldon. LOL, would that it truly "eliminated" them! I
>reserve the kill(plonk) file for temporary use, as a day count can be set for
>each entry.
>
I have Xnews here on the machine, but I've not found it to be quite as
friendly as Agent - probably just due to a lack of time spent with it.
It doesn't seem to be well-suited to permanent archiving to me - but I
think I'll give it another shot.

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
==> Killfiling and filtering posters through weights&measures <==

Aren't you contributing to the very thing you dislike? Giving the
fat-assed ******* a platform through which to promote his spew...

The Ranger

Wayne Boatwright wrote on 01 May 2005 in rec.food.cooking

> Now I'm working on a button for my dash that would blast the
> offending vehicle in front of me to hell and gone.
>

RadioShack sells a chip with various sounds built in...hook up a cheap
speaker select the ray-gun option and add a button...I did. Great
during rush hour. Kinda like those foam rubber bricks for throwing at
the TV.

--
No Bread Crumbs were hurt in the making of this Meal.
Type 2 Diabetic Since Aug 2004
1AC- 7.2, 7.3, 5.5, 5.6 mmol
Weight from 265 down to 219 lbs. and dropping.
Continuing to be Manitoban

On Sun 01 May 2005 11:26:55a, The Ranger wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote: ==> Killfiling and
>> filtering posters through weights&measures <==
>
> Aren't you contributing to the very thing you dislike? Giving the
> fat-assed ******* a platform through which to promote his spew...
>
> The Ranger

Yes, and that (and this) was my last comment on the subject.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Sun 01 May 2005 11:16:30a, AlleyGator wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
>>I also use Xnews and I also eliminate all crossposted threads, as well
>>as assorted subjects and posters in my score file that I want to
>>permanently eliminate; e.g., Sheldon. LOL, would that it truly
>>"eliminated" them! I reserve the kill(plonk) file for temporary use, as
>>a day count can be set for each entry.
>>
> I have Xnews here on the machine, but I've not found it to be quite as
> friendly as Agent - probably just due to a lack of time spent with it.
> It doesn't seem to be well-suited to permanent archiving to me - but I
> think I'll give it another shot.

Xnews takes some time to get it working the way you want. Not sure what you
mean by "permanent archiving".

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Sun 01 May 2005 11:42:19a, Monsur Fromage du Pollet wrote in
rec.food.cooking:

> Wayne Boatwright wrote on 01 May 2005 in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Now I'm working on a button for my dash that would blast the
>> offending vehicle in front of me to hell and gone.
>>
>
> RadioShack sells a chip with various sounds built in...hook up a cheap
> speaker select the ray-gun option and add a button...I did. Great
> during rush hour. Kinda like those foam rubber bricks for throwing at
> the TV.
>

Hey, I LIKE that idea!

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

In article >, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> Now I'm working on a button for my dash that would blast the offending
> vehicle in front of me to hell and gone.

I want a big spike that can go into the car in front of me, lift it,
move it to the side of the road, and drop it there. Barring that, I
think Rich's idea of a huge bright light that you can shine on them
(much brighter than the brights on a car) would work nicely too.

Regards,
Ranee (who hates people who slow down in the fast lane, don't signal,
swerve in and out of lanes, won't slow down or speed up so you can
merge, speed up so you can't pass them, but then slow down when you are
behind them...)

--
Remove Do Not and Spam to email

"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

See my Blog at: http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/

Sheldon wrote:

> D'Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > Sheldon wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > D'Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > >> AlleyGator-MasturBator wrote about child molestation:
> > >> >
> > >> > I don't know why I still see you, but it's fairly disappointing.
> > >>
> > >> I killfiled him years ago.
> > >
> > >
> > > Years ago??? You've been posting here only about a year... NEWBIE!
> >
> > As usual, you don't know what the **** you're talking about. The
> only way I
> > ever see what you write is when it's quoted.
>
> No one quoted this but ME, you ****ing PINHEAD! DUH
>
> D'Wayne, you are a _NEWBIE_ and a *LIAR*... and if you wre any dumber
> you'd be a sea cucumber.


Gee, another peaceful Sunday evening I see on rfc.. <VBG>


At least I've gotten lotsa chuckles with which to start my week off on the
right foot ;--p

--
Best
Greg "doesn't go to church, prefers to worship at The Belly Of The Beast..."

Alternate Identity wrote:

> Guys,
>
> As goofy (and sometimes nasty) as Sheldon gets, this sounds a bit out of
> character even for him.
>
> I've been "cyberstalked" before and had my ID faked by a Cyber-imitator
> ass hole.
>
> I'm thinking that this is not being posted by Sheldon.


Oh, you'd be wrong about that :-)

No one can imitate Sheldon (and several have tried, the imposters are simple
to spot).

["HellOOO Brad...!!!"]


> At least I hope not. :-(
>
> This is too ugly even for him???


Sheldon's maledictions may be lacerating at times but I prefer them for
their sheer entertainment value (and I have been the object of his ire a
number of times) :-)

--
Best
Greg

On Sun 01 May 2005 08:18:46p, Gregory Morrow wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> Sheldon wrote:
>
>> D'Wayne, you are a _NEWBIE_ and a *LIAR*... and if you wre any dumber
>> you'd be a sea cucumber.

Hey, do you suppose you could make a cucumber and sour cream salad with a
sea cucumber?

> Gee, another peaceful Sunday evening I see on rfc.. <VBG>
>
>
> At least I've gotten lotsa chuckles with which to start my week off on
> the right foot ;--p

Well, that makes one of us. :-)

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Sun 01 May 2005 08:23:55p, Gregory Morrow wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Sheldon's maledictions may be lacerating at times but I prefer them for
> their sheer entertainment value (and I have been the object of his ire a
> number of times) :-)
>

Personally, I just find him totally revolting in every way at all times.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Sun 01 May 2005 08:18:46p, Gregory Morrow wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
> >
> > Sheldon wrote:
> >
> >> D'Wayne, you are a _NEWBIE_ and a *LIAR*... and if you wre any dumber
> >> you'd be a sea cucumber.
>
> Hey, do you suppose you could make a cucumber and sour cream salad with a
> sea cucumber?


I've had sea cucumber at Chinese restos, it's nothing special, just kind of
gelatinous.

At least it's not one of those "tastes like chicken" thangs, it tastes,
well, just like nothing particular at all...

Are sea cucumbers not ambi - sexual creatures, I wonder...???

--
Best
Greg

On Sun 01 May 2005 09:35:06p, Gregory Morrow wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> I've had sea cucumber at Chinese restos, it's nothing special, just kind of
> gelatinous.
>
> At least it's not one of those "tastes like chicken" thangs, it tastes,
> well, just like nothing particular at all...
>
> Are sea cucumbers not ambi - sexual creatures, I wonder...???

Sounds like Sheldon, ask him! :-)

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974