On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:42:48 -0400, jmcquown wrote:

> Why the hell would you or anyone else suggest that to a person? You
> sound almost proud of yourself. Wishing people dead is like something a
> child would do when they don't get their way at the moment.

True. Also, if you're not just saying it to troll, when one truly wants
someone dead, one sets about immediately planning the most effective
strategy to kill that person as quickly as possible. It's not something
that usually works out well for either person involved.

On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 3:53:51 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:42:48 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
> > Why the hell would you or anyone else suggest that to a person? You
> > sound almost proud of yourself. Wishing people dead is like something a
> > child would do when they don't get their way at the moment.
> True. Also, if you're not just saying it to troll, when one truly wants
> someone dead, one sets about immediately planning the most effective
> strategy to kill that person as quickly as possible. It's not something
> that usually works out well for either person involved.
>
That is incorrect. 99% of people who wish someone was dead do absolutely
nothing but wish, and only a tiny minority of folks who openly state that they
wished someone was dead ever go beyond that.
http://www.neighborhoodarchive.com/m...shes_dont.html
>
--Bryan

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:07:38 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:

> That is incorrect. 99% of people who wish someone was dead do
> absolutely nothing but wish,

Ah, so they know it's just an imaginary fantasy, like world peace / free
beer, and not a genuine desire.

> and only a tiny minority of folks who openly state
> that they wished someone was dead ever go beyond that.

Bullshit. Anyone *seriously* thinking about killing does not broadcast
it. If the target ends up murdered, the bigmouth braggart becomes the
prime suspect given that it's unlikely at this point in his life for John
to end up with a #1 (spousal) suspect.

Plus you live in the same city. Let's say that one of your old friends,
perhaps less amicable than the one we met here a few weeks ago, finally
snaps from all the Covid bullshit and gives John his due. If the killer
has any sense, he (/she?) would just leave a trail of anchovies leading
to you.

Mike Duffy wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:07:38 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
> > That is incorrect. 99% of people who wish someone was dead do
> > absolutely nothing but wish,
>
> Ah, so they know it's just an imaginary fantasy, like world peace /
> free beer, and not a genuine desire.
>
> > and only a tiny minority of folks who openly state
> > that they wished someone was dead ever go beyond that.
>
> Bullshit. Anyone seriously thinking about killing does not broadcast
> it. If the target ends up murdered, the bigmouth braggart becomes the
> prime suspect given that it's unlikely at this point in his life for
> John to end up with a #1 (spousal) suspect.
>
> Plus you live in the same city. Let's say that one of your old
> friends, perhaps less amicable than the one we met here a few weeks
> ago, finally snaps from all the Covid bullshit and gives John his
> due.


"His due?" Why does RFC attract so many mental patients? It must be in
the food.

--
The real Dr. Bruce posts with uni-berlin.de - individual.net

On 4/17/2021 8:07 PM, Dr. Bruce wrote:
> Mike Duffy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:07:38 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>
>>> That is incorrect. 99% of people who wish someone was dead do
>>> absolutely nothing but wish,
>>
>> Ah, so they know it's just an imaginary fantasy, like world peace /
>> free beer, and not a genuine desire.
>>
>>> and only a tiny minority of folks who openly state
>>> that they wished someone was dead ever go beyond that.
>>
>> Bullshit. Anyone seriously thinking about killing does not broadcast
>> it. If the target ends up murdered, the bigmouth braggart becomes the
>> prime suspect given that it's unlikely at this point in his life for
>> John to end up with a #1 (spousal) suspect.
>>
>> Plus you live in the same city. Let's say that one of your old
>> friends, perhaps less amicable than the one we met here a few weeks
>> ago, finally snaps from all the Covid bullshit and gives John his
>> due.
>
>
> "His due?" Why does RFC attract so many mental patients?
>
You mean the non meat eaters, yea most of them are really
****ed in the head.
--
The real Bruce posts like a French sissy

On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 6:33:10 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:07:38 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
> > That is incorrect. 99% of people who wish someone was dead do
> > absolutely nothing but wish,
> Ah, so they know it's just an imaginary fantasy, like world peace / free
> beer, and not a genuine desire.
>
You write, "Ah," like this is a revelation to you, but you still miss the point
that there are many cases where a person would wish that they never
had to deal with person X again, and really wish that the person would be
dead, because you sure as Hell won't have to deal with them if they're dead.
>
> > and only a tiny minority of folks who openly state
> > that they wished someone was dead ever go beyond that.
>
> Bullshit. Anyone *seriously* thinking about killing does not broadcast
> it. If the target ends up murdered, the bigmouth braggart becomes the
> prime suspect given that it's unlikely at this point in his life for John
> to end up with a #1 (spousal) suspect.
>
I don't know why you wrote, "Bullshit," when you were agreeing with me
that persons who intend to kill the person don't typically announce
beforehand, especially on a public forum, that they wish that the person
was dead.
>
> Plus you live in the same city. Let's say that one of your old friends,
> perhaps less amicable than the one we met here a few weeks ago, finally
> snaps from all the Covid bullshit and gives John his due. If the killer
> has any sense, he (/she?) would just leave a trail of anchovies leading
> to you.
>
Personally, I do not believe that the Kurtz posts were from that person.
If you know how to search both Usenet and the WWW, you can glean a
lot of info that allows you to impersonate. C. Kurtz never posted here
before, and like most folks, is probably unaware of the very existence
of Usenet. I think it was you that suggested that *I* had contacted
her/him, and that was not the case.

Kurtz, and Kuthe for that matter, both fancied themselves some kind of
hippies, and the aggression in those "Kurtz" posts are not anything
that I could see him feeling about Kuthe. Nobody is about killing
anybody. As much as Kuthe is despised by lots of folks here in StL, no
one has a motive to kill him. He just wouldn't be mourned by many.
>
--Bryan

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:30:24 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:

> You write, "Ah," like this is a revelation to you, but you still miss
> the point that there are many cases where a person would wish that they
> never had to deal with person X again, and really wish that the person
> would be dead, because you sure as Hell won't have to deal with them if
> they're dead.

'Dealing' with them also includes going to the slammer if someone else
does the dirty deed for you. (Charles Manson).


> I don't know why you wrote, "Bullshit," when you were agreeing with me
> that persons who intend to kill the person don't typically announce
> beforehand, especially on a public forum, that they wish that the person
> was dead.

Try giving that excuse to the cops. "No, it wasn't me because if I were
planning to kill him, I wouldn't have bragged about it ahead of time."

Despite it not being a bright idea, people do actually make such threats.


> Personally, I do not believe that the Kurtz posts were from that person.

Probably you are in the best position to accurately make that assessment.
I say this despite that you & John both have a lot of old baggage looping
on the carousel of unfulfilled dreams.


> I think it was you that suggested that *I* had contacted
> her/him, and that was not the case.

It was not me. Perhaps I said something that was misconstrued. I'm pretty
sure Steve always speaks the literal truth, but he does have a knack of
pre-loading context with ambivalent statements that increase the
likelyhood of making an errant assumption. (I can say this because I am a
master of this rhetorical tool.)


> Kurtz, and Kuthe for that matter, both fancied themselves some kind of
> hippies, and the aggression in those "Kurtz" posts are not anything that
> I could see him feeling about Kuthe. Nobody is about killing anybody.

I know deep down that nobody (including you) are about killing. As you
may or may not have realized by now, the tensor I use to map between
objective & subjective reality is skewed about the vector of deliberate
death. For legal reasons, I cannot elaborate publicly.

Also, +1 for ignoring the anchovy troll.

Mike Duffy wrote:

> It was not me. Perhaps I said something that was misconstrued. I'm
> pretty sure Steve always speaks the literal truth, but he does have a
> knack of pre-loading context with ambivalent statements that increase
> the likelyhood of making an errant assumption. (I can say this
> because I am a master of this rhetorical tool.)

lol

> > Kurtz, and Kuthe for that matter, both fancied themselves some kind
> > of hippies, and the aggression in those "Kurtz" posts are not
> > anything that I could see him feeling about Kuthe. Nobody is about
> > killing anybody.
>
> I know deep down that nobody (including you) are about killing. As
> you may or may not have realized by now, the tensor I use to map
> between objective & subjective reality is skewed about the vector of
> deliberate death. For legal reasons, I cannot elaborate publicly.

lol

More please.

--
The real Dr. Bruce posts with uni-berlin.de - individual.net

On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 9:23:32 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:30:24 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
> Nobody is about killing anybody.
>
> I know deep down that nobody (including you) are about killing. As you
> may or may not have realized by now, the tensor I use to map between
> objective & subjective reality is skewed about the vector of deliberate
> death. For legal reasons, I cannot elaborate publicly.
>
The publisher of your new murder mystery has stipulated silence?
>
> Also, +1 for ignoring the anchovy troll.

_____________________
"Hey," asked Winter, "if I took that entire can of anchovies, and chewed
them into a mush, then asked you to tongue kiss me, would you?"
Ian replied in the same manner as she had when asking what was for
dinner, "In a heartbeat, but then we couldn't make a proper Caesar
dressing."
_____________________
>
--Bryan