On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 8:07:19 AM UTC-4, Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
> (in >):
> > Fauci said you didn't need one when masks were in short supply
> > and they needed to be saved for front-line medical workers.
> My wife made my first mask in two hours. Five layers. Tony said I didn´t
> need one. How did what he said benefit me? How was what he said a possible
> detriment to me?

It's not about you. It's about the millions of people out there who
had no option but to buy masks that were more needed on the faces
of doctors and nurses.

How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?

Cindy Hamilton

On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
(in >):

> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?

How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
did a national disservice.
Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
transmission.
Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
wouldn´t have listened.

leo

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:06:14 -0700, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
>(in >):
>
>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>
>How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
>MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
>did a national disservice.
>Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
>saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
>transmission.

What is particularly appalling was Fauci post election. Incredibly
unprofessional and divisive. The man is supposed to show impartiality
and be above politics and simply do his job as director of the U.S.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1804862.html


Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.

On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:

>
> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>

Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.

Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.

On Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 2:50:25 PM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>
> >
> > Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
> > 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
> > similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
> > democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
> > on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
> >
> Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>
> Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.

America is swarming with Trumpeters going wild. Death fatwas will be trending in the new, radicalized, America. An America of tranquility and harmony has been rendered extinct. Hope all y'alls enjoy it!

https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2021...ullets-in-car/

On 2021 Mar 18, , Ed Pawlowski wrote
(in article >):

> Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.

Why? Rand Paul has a far more current MD degree than Fauci does.

On 3/18/2021 10:24 PM, Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Mar 18, , Ed Pawlowski wrote
> (in article >):
>
>> Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>
> Why? Rand Paul has a far more current MD degree than Fauci does.
>
>

He was going on about masks and studies. He would not let Fauci finish
his reasoning about the variants and how they are still possibly
contagious in spite of having antibodies.

Fauci came across as s sensible scientist using reason to draw
conclusions.

Paul came across as a know it all bully that kept interrupting, talking
over and not letting the other side make a statement.

I did not see him as a doctor, just a loud mouth politician. If you
want to investigate, listen to the people you are questioning, that is
why you brought them.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>
>>
>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>
>
>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.

What public figure doesn't get death threats. Wake up. And why do you
feel he doesn't deserve security?

>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.

Did he? That's nice. Relevance?

On 3/18/2021 10:23 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>
> What public figure doesn't get death threats. Wake up. And why do you
> feel he doesn't deserve security?

I guess you don't understand sarcasm. You were the one questioning the
need for security;
>
>> Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>
> Did he? That's nice. Relevance?

The relevance is your disdain for Fauci when he came across far more
knowledgeable than Paul that came across as a bully.I trust hem much
more than some of the other "experts" dredged up by Trump.
>

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:23:46 +1100, Susan Moseley >
wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>
>>
>>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>
>What public figure doesn't get death threats. Wake up. And why do you
>feel he doesn't deserve security?
>
>>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>
>Did he? That's nice. Relevance?

I don't care for either's personality but Rand Paul seems to know a
lot more about viral transfer than Fauci.

On Friday, March 19, 2021 at 10:36:18 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:23:46 +1100, Susan Moseley >
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> >>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
> >>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
> >>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
> >>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
> >>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
> >>
> >>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
> >
> >What public figure doesn't get death threats. Wake up. And why do you
> >feel he doesn't deserve security?
> >
> >>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
> >
> >Did he? That's nice. Relevance?
>
> I don't care for either's personality but Rand Paul seems to know a
> lot more about viral transfer than Fauci.

Aha !! I see already why JWK had a prob with you. You go by "seems"? You certainly don't sound sure of yourself, do you?

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:36:12 -0400, Sheldon Martin >
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:23:46 +1100, Susan Moseley >
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>>
>>What public figure doesn't get death threats. Wake up. And why do you
>>feel he doesn't deserve security?
>>
>>>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>>
>>Did he? That's nice. Relevance?
>
>I don't care for either's personality but Rand Paul seems to know a
>lot more about viral transfer than Fauci.

Really, Sheldon. Are there no limits to your stupidity at all?

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>
>>
>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>
>
>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>
>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.

I find myself admiring Paul's neighbor more and more each day.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:58:02 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>
>>
>>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>>
>>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>
>I find myself admiring Paul's neighbor more and more each day.

I always figured there was a strong reason that the neighbor
apparently beat the crap out of RP. RP's a bully and uses bully
tactics. I haven't ever heard him use reason to support his view.
Today was an example.
Janet US

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:07:18 -0600, US Janet >
wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:58:02 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>>>
>>>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>>
>>I find myself admiring Paul's neighbor more and more each day.
>
>I always figured there was a strong reason that the neighbor
>apparently beat the crap out of RP. RP's a bully and uses bully
>tactics. I haven't ever heard him use reason to support his view.
>Today was an example.
>Janet US

Not to mention apples and trees...Rand's daddy is, among other
idiocies, a raving racist

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:07:18 -0600, US Janet >
wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:58:02 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:50:12 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>On 3/18/2021 8:21 PM, Susan Moseley wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fauci, as a prominent public figure seems to think he is special in
>>>> 'needing' armed security. And naturally, it's Trump's fault. He did
>>>> similar with previous Republican administrations (but SILENT during
>>>> democrat admins). This is the guy advising the authorities and public
>>>> on Covid. He should be replaced, forthwith.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sure, even though there were death threats he does not deserve security.
>>>
>>>Rand Paul made a fool of himself questioning Fauci today.
>>
>>I find myself admiring Paul's neighbor more and more each day.
>
>I always figured there was a strong reason that the neighbor
>apparently beat the crap out of RP. RP's a bully and uses bully
>tactics. I haven't ever heard him use reason to support his view.
>Today was an example.
>Janet US

Wearing the paper disposables and cloth washables only give a false
sense of security, they do little to nothing for preventing the
transmission of viruses and other germs, particulates, and gasses. I
worked in dirty dusty fume filled manufacturing plants for most of my
life and always wore a proper respirator fitted with the proper
filters. Now I wear a disposable paper mask when I'm around other
people (which is rare) to stop any harrassment from the imbeciles but
I know for a scientific fact that it does little to nothing to prevent
transmission. Surgeons can wear N95 masks because the OR maintains a
negative atmosphere, the air is constantly vacuumed out and replaced
with properly filtered air... they are working in clean room
conditions same as I did all my working life, especially when working
with radioactive materials in what Brookhaven National Laboratory
called the 'hotshop'. We were all suited up in Hazmat gear. Viruses
can and do transmit through skin and especially eyes. The OR workers
wear paper masks same as they wear surgical gloves, and they are
properly clothed, to protect from splashing bodily fluids, blood, and
guts is all. they're all suited up to protect their skin. I can tell
from listening to the doctors on TV, NONE had any formal training in
protective gear. They shouldn't be pushing fake-news masks to the
unsuspecting public... may as well be a Halloween party. Feel free to
go on line and search <respirator>.

On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
> (in >):
>
>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>
> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
> MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
> did a national disservice.
> Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
> saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
> transmission.
> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
> know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
> pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
> wouldn´t have listened.
>
> leo
>
>
Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:38:17 -0600, Graham > wrote:

>On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
>> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
>> (in >):
>>
>>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>>
>> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
>> MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
>> did a national disservice.
>> Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
>> saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
>> transmission.
>> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
>> know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
>> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
>> pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
>> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
>> wouldn´t have listened.
>>
>> leo
>>
>>
>Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?

When people ask that question in this particular context, it's an
indicator that they're a simpleton, Graham. Thus, you're a simpleton.

On 2021-03-18 8:43 p.m., Pamela wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:38:17 -0600, Graham > wrote:
>
>> On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
>>> (in >):
>>>
>>>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>>>
>>> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
>>> MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
>>> did a national disservice.
>>> Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
>>> saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
>>> transmission.
>>> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
>>> know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
>>> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
>>> pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
>>> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
>>> wouldn´t have listened.
>>>
>>> leo
>>>
>>>
>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>
> When people ask that question in this particular context, it's an
> indicator that they're a simpleton, Graham. Thus, you're a simpleton.
>

It's a better indication that they think you are.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:53:49 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2021-03-18 8:43 p.m., Pamela wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:38:17 -0600, Graham > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>>> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
>>>> (in >):
>>>>
>>>>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>>>>
>>>> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
>>>> MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
>>>> did a national disservice.
>>>> Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
>>>> saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
>>>> transmission.
>>>> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
>>>> know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
>>>> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
>>>> pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
>>>> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
>>>> wouldn´t have listened.
>>>>
>>>> leo
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>>
>> When people ask that question in this particular context, it's an
>> indicator that they're a simpleton, Graham. Thus, you're a simpleton.
>>
>
>It's a better indication that they think you are.

Look who's talking. You can't even take care of your own health using
basic logic.

On 02:19 19 Mar 2021, Pamela said:

> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:53:49 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>On 2021-03-18 8:43 p.m., Pamela wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:38:17 -0600, Graham >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>>>> On 2021 Mar 16, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
>>>>> (in
>>>>> article<99cd5712-cdca-4b50-bf51-
>
>>>>> ):
>>>>>
>>>>>> How many millions of masks did your wife want to make?
>>>>>
>>>>> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a
>>>>> bureaucrat with a MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no
>>>>> masks were necessary, forget N95, he did a national
>>>>> disservice. Or did he? Only researchers know the partial
>>>>> answer now, and they ain´t saying. Or are they? Let´s get some
>>>>> percentages for mask/no mask transmission.
>>>>> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists".
>>>>> They don´t know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
>>>>> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any
>>>>> airborne pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
>>>>> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11,
>>>>> 2020, but you wouldn´t have listened.
>>>>>
>>>>> leo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>>>
>>> When people ask that question in this particular context, it's
>>> an indicator that they're a simpleton, Graham. Thus, you're a
>>> simpleton.
>>>
>>
>>It's a better indication that they think you are.
>
> Look who's talking. You can't even take care of your own health
> using basic logic.

Neodone, that's scrambled thinking untypical of me.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:38:17 -0600, Graham > wrote:

>On 2021-03-18 6:06 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>
>> How many millions of people did The Fauch mislead? He´s a bureaucrat with a
>> MD from fifty years ago. Saying that no masks were necessary, forget N95, he
>> did a national disservice.
>> Or did he? Only researchers know the partial answer now, and they ain´t
>> saying. Or are they? Let´s get some percentages for mask/no mask
>> transmission.
>> Current CDC guidance is a reason to disbelieve "scientists". They don´t
>> know sh*t. I thought they would by now.
>> Having said that, I do what I believe is best practice for any airborne
>> pathogen, and that´s all they got too.
>> I could have told you their current guidance on March 11, 2020, but you
>> wouldn´t have listened.
>>
>> leo
>>
>>
>Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?

Yes, he does. He has a degree from Fox News.

It's good to see all these right wingers whining, bitching and
complaining, knowing that their ring leader has been FIRED.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
(in article >):

> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?

I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?

On Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 8:36:56 PM UTC-5, Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
> (in article >):
> > Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
> I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
> in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?


+100


--
Best
Greg

On 2021 Mar 18, , GM wrote
(in >):

> +100

Thanks, Greg. My company closed its doors in Nevada. We were an outlier for
Alberto Culver, and I was given the opportunity to move to Melrose Park. I
declined so that I could continue working where I still live. No offense ;-)

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:36:50 -0700, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
>(in article >):
>
>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>
>I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
>in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?
>
Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 2021 Mar 18, , Bruce wrote
(in >):

> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.

The horse is dead Bruce. Let it go.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:28:15 -0700, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2021 Mar 18, , Bruce wrote
>(in >):
>
>> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.
>
>The horse is dead Bruce. Let it go.

Bruce has probably never watched Fox, anyway. So he wouldn't know.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:28:15 -0700, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2021 Mar 18, , Bruce wrote
>(in >):
>
>> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.
>
>The horse is dead Bruce. Let it go.
>
Deal, provided you never mention "critical thinking" anymore when
you're referring to yourself. Or did you think I have an endless
supply of irony meters?

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 3/18/2021 9:54 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:36:50 -0700, Leo >
> wrote:
>
>> On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
>> (in article >):
>>
>>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>>
>> I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
>> in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?
>>
> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.
>
Don't say that. You admitted that you only watched Fox News one time.
You know nothing about that news channel.

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:31:37 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>On 3/18/2021 9:54 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:36:50 -0700, Leo >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
>>> (in article >):
>>>
>>>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>>>
>>> I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
>>> in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?
>>>
>> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.
>>
>Don't say that. You admitted that you only watched Fox News one time.
>You know nothing about that news channel.

But I'm a Liberal. I don't need to have direct, personal knowledge of
something to judge it.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:31:37 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>On 3/18/2021 9:54 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:36:50 -0700, Leo >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
>>> (in article >):
>>>
>>>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>>>
>>> I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
>>> in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?
>>>
>> Says the man who gets his information from Fox News.
>>
>Don't say that. You admitted that you only watched Fox News one time.
>You know nothing about that news channel.
>
We lasted an hour. They were lying through their teeth, to the point
that they must have known it themselves. It was nothing but a Trump
propaganda machine, with no interest in the truth at all.

It reminded me a bit of the English The Sun newspaper. When the UK and
the EU had a conflict about who could fish where, they headlined
"Boris, get the warships ready!"

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 2021-03-18 7:36 p.m., Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Mar 18, , Graham wrote
> (in article >):
>
>> Just to be clear, do you have a science degree?
>
> I do. BSChem plus seven years as a the lone industrial chemist at a facility
> in the cosmetics trade. I even know what critical thinking means. You?
>
>
Me too with many years post-graduate experience.
The reason I asked was that far too many believe what appears in the
newspapers where the standard of science reporting is appalling.