****ing Headhunters! :-(


John Kuthe...

On 2/3/2021 5:57 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>
>
> John Kuthe...
>


But I hear headhunters make a mean cauldron of soup.

On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>
>
> John Kuthe...

Does it matter? A job's a job.

Cindy Hamilton

On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> > ****ing Headhunters! :-(
> >
> >
> > John Kuthe...
> Does it matter? A job's a job.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!


John Kuthe...

wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> > > ****ing Headhunters! :-(
> > >
> > >
> > > John Kuthe...
> > Does it matter? A job's a job.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
> There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!


No, recruiters get paid for the candidates that they successfully place...

--
Best
Greg

On 2/3/2021 5:57 AM, John KOOKthe wrote:

> Fu

Shut the **** up, you deranged asswipe.

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

On 2/3/2021 5:57 AM, John KOOKthe wrote:

> Fu

Shut the **** up, you deranged asswipe.

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

On 2/3/2021 7:26 AM, John KOOKthe wrote:

> There IS NO JOB!

Not for a mentally ill idiot like you, KOOKthe.

Shut the **** up, you deranged asswipe.

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

John Kuthe wrote:

> ****ing Headhunters! :-(

****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(

--
The real Bruce posting with charset=WINDOWS-1258 (see headers)

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>>
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>> Does it matter? A job's a job.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
> There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!
>
>
> John Kuthe...

No, they don't.Â* They get a commission based on job placements only.

John Kuthe wrote:
> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>
>
> John Kuthe...

You posted the same error, bozo.

On 2/3/2021 2:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:
>
>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>
> ****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(
>
Folks from elsewhere don't know any better, but locally only stupid
children and culturally trashy folks refer to St. Louis as "Da Lou."
Other than our Zoo and Symphony Orchestra, which are both world class,
and the Cardinals, there's not much remarkable about StL except that
there are a lot of murders here, especially in certain neighborhoods.
It's not just the City of St. Louis either. There are all these little
municipalities in St. Louis County, some of which are pretty safe in one
neighborhood, but dangerous in others. My son and I looked at a house
today in a municipality like that. The neighborhood seemed fine, but
other areas of that same city are dangerous. It is a nice two bedroom
house with a great big back yard, being offered for sale for 94K, in a
decent neighborhood. It's a lot of house and a lot of yard for that
price. His buyer's agent was going to write up an offer on it, but she
told him that someone else had just put a contract on it today.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

BryanGSimmons wrote:

> On 2/3/2021 2:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>
>> ****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(
>>
> Folks from elsewhere don't know any better, but locally only stupid
> children and culturally trashy folks refer to St. Louis as "Da Lou."
> Other than our Zoo and Symphony Orchestra, which are both world class,
> and the Cardinals, there's not much remarkable about StL except that
> there are a lot of murders here, especially in certain neighborhoods.
> It's not just the City of St. Louis either. There are all these little
> municipalities in St. Louis County, some of which are pretty safe in one
> neighborhood, but dangerous in others. My son and I looked at a house
> today in a municipality like that. The neighborhood seemed fine, but
> other areas of that same city are dangerous. It is a nice two bedroom
> house with a great big back yard, being offered for sale for 94K, in a
> decent neighborhood. It's a lot of house and a lot of yard for that
> price. His buyer's agent was going to write up an offer on it, but she
> told him that someone else had just put a contract on it today.

Did you see the St. Louis Schools documentary by a Canadian
skateboarder?

--
The real Bruce posts with provider NewsgroupDirect (see headers)

On 2/3/2021 6:28 PM, Bruce wrote:
> BryanGSimmons wrote:
>
>> On 2/3/2021 2:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>>
>>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>>
>>> ****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(
>>>
>> Folks from elsewhere don't know any better, but locally only stupid
>> children and culturally trashy folks refer to St. Louis as "Da Lou."
>> Other than our Zoo and Symphony Orchestra, which are both world class,
>> and the Cardinals, there's not much remarkable about StL except that
>> there are a lot of murders here, especially in certain neighborhoods.
>> It's not just the City of St. Louis either. There are all these little
>> municipalities in St. Louis County, some of which are pretty safe in one
>> neighborhood, but dangerous in others. My son and I looked at a house
>> today in a municipality like that. The neighborhood seemed fine, but
>> other areas of that same city are dangerous. It is a nice two bedroom
>> house with a great big back yard, being offered for sale for 94K, in a
>> decent neighborhood. It's a lot of house and a lot of yard for that
>> price. His buyer's agent was going to write up an offer on it, but she
>> told him that someone else had just put a contract on it today.
>
> Did you see the St. Louis Schools documentary by a Canadian
> skateboarder?
>
No, but today when we were looking at the house, there was a hill just
blocks away that my son wanted to bomb on my cruiser. I agreed to give
it to him today because I am too old (and too top-heavy) to be skating.
This is the deck.
https://www.nativeskatestore.co.uk/s...ck-9-125-p6459
My wife said that the graphic looked like Mother Theresa. Even if I
lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/3/2021 4:20 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
> On 2/3/2021 2:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>
>> ****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(
>>
> Folks from elsewhere don't know any better, but locally only stupid
> children and culturally trashy folks refer to St. Louis as "Da Lou."
> Other than our Zoo and Symphony Orchestra, which are both world class,
> and the Cardinals, there's not much remarkable about StL except that
> there are a lot of murders here, especially in certain neighborhoods.
> It's not just the City of St. Louis either. There are all these little
> municipalities in St. Louis County, some of which are pretty safe in one
> neighborhood, but dangerous in others. My son and I looked at a house
> today in a municipality like that. The neighborhood seemed fine, but
> other areas of that same city are dangerous. It is a nice two bedroom
> house with a great big back yard, being offered for sale for 94K, in a
> decent neighborhood. It's a lot of house and a lot of yard for that
> price. His buyer's agent was going to write up an offer on it, but she
> told him that someone else had just put a contract on it today.
>


But how long will that neighborhood remain decent?

On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 6:20:18 PM UTC-6, wrote:
> On 2/3/2021 2:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
> > John Kuthe wrote:
> >
> >> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
> >
> > ****ing narcissists :from Da Lou :-(
> >
> Folks from elsewhere don't know any better, but locally only stupid
> children and culturally trashy folks refer to St. Louis as "Da Lou."
> Other than our Zoo and Symphony Orchestra, which are both world class,
> and the Cardinals, there's not much remarkable about StL except that
> there are a lot of murders here, especially in certain neighborhoods.
> It's not just the City of St. Louis either. There are all these little
> municipalities in St. Louis County, some of which are pretty safe in one
> neighborhood, but dangerous in others. My son and I looked at a house
> today in a municipality like that. The neighborhood seemed fine, but
> other areas of that same city are dangerous. It is a nice two bedroom
> house with a great big back yard, being offered for sale for 94K, in a
> decent neighborhood. It's a lot of house and a lot of yard for that
> price. His buyer's agent was going to write up an offer on it, but she
> told him that someone else had just put a contract on it today.
>
> --
> --Bryan
> For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
> tested on laboratory animals.

There is no such thing as a bad neighborhood, only bad people!

And I find of you treat others with kindness and respect, there is no such thing as any bad people!

If someone tried to break in my house, I would invite them in and make them a sandwich and also make them my friend! I make very good sandwiches on Schnuck's Everything Bagels.


John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

On 2/3/2021 7:43 PM, John KOOKthe wrote:

> There

NOBODY CARES, YOU MORONIC ****WIT!

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

BryanGSimmons wrote:
> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.

Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.

Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.

I did, this past week, offer to give my snowboard to my grandsons next
time they come. Never snows here and no good hills if it did.
They'll get more use out of it if they're interested.

Taxed and Spent wrote:
> But how long will that neighborhood remain decent?

Even many bad neighborhoods can appear nice and friendly during the
daytime. Best to take a drive through there in the evening or at night.

The trouble makers tend to sleep all day, then stay out all night.

In article >, says...
>
> BryanGSimmons wrote:
> > Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>
> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
>
> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
>
Didn't you say something about you being too
old for sex, or am I thinking os someone else?
--
Regards
David Crossley

On 2021-02-04 7:18 a.m., Gary wrote:
> *BryanGSimmons wrote:
>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>
> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.

My father was in his 30s when he taught me to skate. He fell and broke
his wrist. The first winter we lived here, my neighbour, who was about
40, was teaching his son to skate. He fell and broke his wrist. The new
neighbour cleaned the snow off the pond in his front yard and was
teaching his son how to skate. I could not help but think of those other
two fathers.



> I did, this past week, offer to give my snowboard to my grandsons next
> time they come. Never snows here and no good hills if it did.
> They'll get more use out of it if they're interested.
>

Has snowboard technology and equipment changed much? I took up skiing in
my mid 40s and was surprised to see how much different skis, boots and
bindings were than they had been when I was a kid. My old skis would be
antiques on the slopes these days. Boots, bindings and skis have all
changed again.

Dave Smith wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>> I did, this past week, offer to give my snowboard to my grandsons next
>> time they come. Never snows here and no good hills if it did.
>> They'll get more use out of it if they're interested.
>>
>
> Has snowboard technology and equipment changed much? I took up skiing in
> my mid 40s and was surprised to see how much different skis, boots and
> bindings were than they had been when I was a kid. My old skis would be
> antiques on the slopes these days. Boots, bindings and skis have all
> changed again.

It changes all the time. Mostly boards getting shorter (just like skis
have over the years). Mine is only about 10 years old so not much
change since then.

It *IS* maybe a bit long for my young grandkids right now until they
grow taller. I don't expect a visit in the next month or two so this
will be for them next winter.

Just something extra for them to play with next winter to see if they
even like the sport. If they do, then they can ask mom&dad for more
customized ones.

In article >, says...
>
> In article >, says...
> >
> > BryanGSimmons wrote:
> > > Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >
> > Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >
> > Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
> > Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> > I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >
> Didn't you say something about you being too
> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
>
>

Crickets...

--
Regards
David Crossley

On 2/3/2021 10:26 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>>
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>> Does it matter? A job's a job.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!
>
>
> John Kuthe...
>
You have no clue what headhunters actually do. They are paid when they
place a client with a company. They do not get paid by the number of
resumes they collect.

Jill

On 05/02/2021 14:40, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/3/2021 10:26 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5,
>>> wrote:
>>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Kuthe...
>>> Does it matter? A job's a job.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!
>>
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>>
> You have no clue what headhunters actually do.Â* They are paid when they
> place a client with a company.Â* They do not get paid by the number of
> resumes they collect.

True. And back when I was doing tech job fairs, the resumes I
round-filed could have made me rich.

On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> In article >, says...
>>>
>>> BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>>>
>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
>>>
>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
>>>
>> Didn't you say something about you being too
>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
>>
>>
>
> Crickets...

Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.

On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 10:13:03 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> In article >, says...
> >>>
> >>> BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >>>
> >>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
> >>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> >>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >>>
> >> Didn't you say something about you being too
> >> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Crickets...
> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.

Shit, my husband wouldn't have met any "standards" when I met him.
35 years later, we're still going strong.

Cindy Hamilton

On 2/5/2021 9:45 AM, S Viemeister wrote:
> On 05/02/2021 14:40, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 2/3/2021 10:26 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 9:04:00 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:57:45 AM UTC-5,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> ****ing Headhunters! :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>> Does it matter? A job's a job.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> There IS NO JOB! Headhunters get PAID by the Resumes they collect!
>>>
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>>
>> You have no clue what headhunters actually do.Â* They are paid when
>> they place a client with a company.Â* They do not get paid by the
>> number of resumes they collect.
>
> True. And back when I was doing tech job fairs, the resumes I
> round-filed could have made me rich.
>
Oh, you forgot the Caps and a couple of Exclamation points: "could have
made me RICH!!"

All he's doing is filling out online job applications then trying to
shift the blame when no one contacts him.

Jill

On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>>
>>> In article >, says...
>>>>
>>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>>>>
>>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
>>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
>>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
>>>>
>>> Didn't you say something about you being too
>>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Crickets...
>
> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>

I guess it depends on what your standards are based on. Looks alone?
Chest size?

I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive. I keep
contact with them on a regular basis too.

On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>>
>>> In article >, says...
>>>>
>>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>>>>
>>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
>>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
>>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
>>>>
>>> Didn't you say something about you being too
>>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Crickets...
>
> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.

Gary. You're letting the troll bait you.

> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>
Serious "supply shortage"? Probably not but you're not looking and
that's okay. Only trolls stirring some shit. And yes, posting from
your beloved aioe. Go team!

Jill

On 2/5/2021 11:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
>> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> In article >, says...
>>>>>
>>>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
>>>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
>>>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
>>>>>
>>>> Didn't you say something about you being too
>>>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Crickets...
>>
>> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
>> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>>
>
> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.* Looks alone?
> Chest size?
>
Gary has made it clear he wouldn't go out with a woman who wears red
lipstick. <shrug>

> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive.* I keep
> contact with them on a regular basis too.

There are plenty of attractive men and women over the age of 60. It
seems (from his posts) Gary has a problem with women who wear makeup.
Makeup doesn't have to be garish or over the top. I'm not sure where
he's seeing these women he thinks he would have to lower standards for.

BTW, I don't care if he's interested in "dating" anyone. It is of no
consequence.

Jill

On 2021-02-05 11:31 a.m., Ed Pawlowski wrote:

>> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
>> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>>
>
> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.* Looks alone?
> Chest size?
>
> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive.* I keep
> contact with them on a regular basis too.

My wife is a babe at 74. Her sister is a babe at 83. The last time I saw
my aunt she was 88 and looked great.

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 Gary wrote:
>Dave Smith wrote:
>> Gary wrote:
>>> I did, this past week, offer to give my snowboard to my grandsons next
>>> time they come. Never snows here and no good hills if it did.
>>> They'll get more use out of it if they're interested.
>>
>> Has snowboard technology and equipment changed much? I took up skiing in
>> my mid 40s and was surprised to see how much different skis, boots and
>> bindings were than they had been when I was a kid. My old skis would be
>> antiques on the slopes these days. Boots, bindings and skis have all
>> changed again.
>
>It changes all the time. Mostly boards getting shorter (just like skis
>have over the years). Mine is only about 10 years old so not much
>change since then.
>
>It *IS* maybe a bit long for my young grandkids right now until they
>grow taller. I don't expect a visit in the next month or two so this
>will be for them next winter.
>
>Just something extra for them to play with next winter to see if they
>even like the sport. If they do, then they can ask mom&dad for more
>customized ones.

There's been a lot of change in the past ten years, skis, boots,
bindings... they wouldn't permit you on the slopes with your ancient
equipment. My wife skis and is constantly buying new in order to
comply, a new helmet almost every year. This year she even bought new
heated socks and mittens, powered from a rechargeable battery pack
worn on the waist. Years ago people would carry skis on a roof rack,
now they are short enough to fit inside the cars, even the new mini
vehicles. They won't allow people on the slopes with the old long
skis anymore, or the old style boots/bindings.
The older heated socks and gloves were powered with D cells strapped
to wrists and ankles, too many accidents with D cells flying off. The
long skis caused too many serious accidents getting on and off the
lifts. The new helmets are stronger, more comfortable, and permit
much better visibility. The newer tags are GPS enabled so they can
find you if you fall off the mountain or are covered in an avalanche.
I don't ski because I can't tolerate heights... a 6 foot ladder is
about my limit. My wife is an excellent skier, she skis the Blacks
but doesn't take risks, she's careful, as she puts it she skis to ski
another day.

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:41:04 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 2/5/2021 11:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.Â* Looks alone?
>> Chest size?
>>
>Gary has made it clear he wouldn't go out with a woman who wears red
>lipstick. <shrug>
>
>> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive.Â* I keep
>> contact with them on a regular basis too.
>
>There are plenty of attractive men and women over the age of 60. It
>seems (from his posts) Gary has a problem with women who wear makeup.
>Makeup doesn't have to be garish or over the top. I'm not sure where
>he's seeing these women he thinks he would have to lower standards for.
>
>BTW, I don't care if he's interested in "dating" anyone. It is of no
>consequence.

Gary's immature. He has a misogynist little boy attitude towards
women.

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:07:16 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2021-02-05 11:31 a.m., Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>>> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>>> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
>>> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>>>
>>
>> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.Â* Looks alone?
>> Chest size?
>>
>> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive.Â* I keep
>> contact with them on a regular basis too.
>
>My wife is a babe at 74. Her sister is a babe at 83. The last time I saw
>my aunt she was 88 and looked great.

OK, now you're exaggerating.

In article >, says...
>
> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> In article >, says...
> >>>
> >>> BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >>>
> >>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.
> >>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> >>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >>>
> >> Didn't you say something about you being too
> >> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Crickets...
>
> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you,
>
IIRC you even said you're too old to jerk off anymore, you
weakling.
>
> troll.
>
Ok, Al Bundy.
--
Regards
David Crossley

In article >, says...
>
> On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> > On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> >> In article >,
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> In article >, says...
> >>>>
> >>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >>>>
> >>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
> >>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> >>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >>>>
> >>> Didn't you say something about you being too
> >>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Crickets...
> >
> > Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>
> Gary. You're letting the troll bait you.
>
> > I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> > group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
> >
> Serious "supply shortage"? Probably not but you're not looking and
> that's okay. Only trolls stirring some shit. And yes, posting from
> your beloved aioe. Go team!
>
> Jill
>
Look at the Jill playing newsgroup moderator again, where do you
see anything I posted above as a troll, you silly ****?
--
Regards
David Crossley

In article >, says...
>
> On 2/5/2021 11:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> >> On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> >>> In article >,
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> In article >, says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
> >>>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> >>>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Didn't you say something about you being too
> >>>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Crickets...
> >>
> >> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
> >> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
> >> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
> >>
> >
> > I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.* Looks alone?
> > Chest size?
> >
> Gary has made it clear he wouldn't go out with a woman who wears red
> lipstick. <shrug>
>
You sound like you need a good boot ****ing.
--
Regards
David Crossley

In article >, says...
>
> On 2/5/2021 10:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> > On 2/5/2021 9:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> >> In article >,
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> In article >, says...
> >>>>
> >>>> * BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>>>> Even if I lost weight, I really *am* too aged to be skating.
> >>>>
> >>>> Age 60 is too old to be skating? I never got that memo.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe I should sell my skateboard and rollerblades.*
> >>>> Might as well get rid of the snowboard and bicycle too.
> >>>> I'll toss in my surfboard as a bonus.
> >>>>
> >>> Didn't you say something about you being too
> >>> old for sex, or am I thinking of someone else?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Crickets...
> >
> > Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>
> Gary. You're letting the troll bait you.
>
Yet you somehow found the need to comment three times
about him not getting laid, you daft ****.
--
Regards
David Crossley

In article >, says...
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:41:04 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 2/5/2021 11:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>
> >> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on.* Looks alone?
> >> Chest size?
> >>
> >Gary has made it clear he wouldn't go out with a woman who wears red
> >lipstick. <shrug>
> >
> >> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive.* I keep
> >> contact with them on a regular basis too.
> >
> >There are plenty of attractive men and women over the age of 60. It
> >seems (from his posts) Gary has a problem with women who wear makeup.
> >Makeup doesn't have to be garish or over the top. I'm not sure where
> >he's seeing these women he thinks he would have to lower standards for.
> >
> >BTW, I don't care if he's interested in "dating" anyone. It is of no
> >consequence.
>
> Gary's immature. He has a misogynist little boy attitude towards
> women.
>
Gary is Al Bundy.
--
Regards
David Crossley