On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >>
>> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> of the potter.
>> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >>
>> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >
>> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>
>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>
>I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.

It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____