"John Kuthe" > wrote in message
...
> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him to
> stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>
> John Kuthe...

Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.

Cheri

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him to
> > stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
> >
> > John Kuthe...
>
> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>
> Cheri

Obsessing? Hardly, I just posted a top post about it. After being a ubiquitous poster here for years, he seems suddenly gone. Hope he's OK, I really do.

John Kuthe...

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
>> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him to
>> > stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>> >
>> > John Kuthe...
>>
>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Obsessing? Hardly, I just posted a top post about it. After being a ubiquitous poster here for years, he seems suddenly gone. Hope he's OK, I really do.
>
> John Kuthe...

he's probably working on his next masterpiece

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.

+1

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 12:10:05 PM UTC-5, tert in seattle wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> >> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him to
> >> > stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
> >> >
> >> > John Kuthe...
> >>
> >> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
> >>
> >> Cheri
> >
> > Obsessing? Hardly, I just posted a top post about it. After being a ubiquitous poster here for years, he seems suddenly gone. Hope he's OK, I really do.
> >
> > John Kuthe...
>
> he's probably working on his next masterpiece

Possibly. ROFL!!! :-)

John Kuthe...

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>
> Cheri

I think so. Bryan is in my KF.

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
> >> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
> >>
> >> John Kuthe...
> >
> > Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
> >
> > Cheri
>
> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.

Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!

John Kuthe....

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote:

>On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>> >> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>> >>
>> >> John Kuthe...
>> >
>> > Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>> >
>> > Cheri
>>
>> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.
>
>Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!
>
>John Kuthe....

Did you mean "Me too!", or *Mine too*?

On 2016-06-03 8:53 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>>>>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>>
>>>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.
>>
>> Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!
>>
>> John Kuthe....
>
> Did you mean "Me too!", or *Mine too*?
>


I think "me too" would be accurate in this case.

On 6/2/2016 9:36 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told
>> him to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>
> Cheri

LOL

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:59:14 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-03 8:53 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>>>>>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.
>>>
>>> Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!
>>>
>>> John Kuthe....
>>
>> Did you mean "Me too!", or *Mine too*?
>>
>
>
>I think "me too" would be accurate in this case.

Yes I believe Kootchie is in many killfiles but I don't believe
Bwrrryan is in his killfile.
I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 8:18:04 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:59:14 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> >On 2016-06-03 8:53 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
> >>>>>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> John Kuthe...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheri
> >>>>
> >>>> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.
> >>>
> >>> Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!
> >>>
> >>> John Kuthe....
> >>
> >> Did you mean "Me too!", or *Mine too*?
> >>
> >
> >
> >I think "me too" would be accurate in this case.
>
> Yes I believe Kootchie is in many killfiles but I don't believe
> Bwrrryan is in his killfile.
> I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.

I don't use my newsreader's killfile option either Sheldon. See in that way I'm as cool as YOU! ;-)

John Kuthe...

On 2016-06-03 9:17 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:59:14 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2016-06-03 8:53 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:26:45 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told him
>>>>>>> to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>
>>>>> I think so. Bryan is in my KF.
>>>>
>>>> Bryan is in many killfiles. Me too!
>>>>
>>>> John Kuthe....
>>>
>>> Did you mean "Me too!", or *Mine too*?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I think "me too" would be accurate in this case.
>
> Yes I believe Kootchie is in many killfiles but I don't believe
> Bwrrryan is in his killfile.


Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.

> I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.

He has not learned to ignore the guy. I am guessing that he may be upset
about the competition for the looniest guy in the group.

On 6/2/2016 12:36 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Hope it means he finally got some therapy and his psychiatrist told
>> him to stay off the Internet! Or at least RFC.
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>
> Cheri

+1 I hadn't noticed the lack of posts from Bryan until he brought it
up. You gotta wonder why he sits around worrying about it.

They really need to take this stupid feud of theirs to private email.
I've got both of them kf'd but someone *always* has to reply. And then,
I can't help myself. LOL All that to say I agree with you, Cheri!

Jill

On 2016-06-03 11:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:

>> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> +1 I hadn't noticed the lack of posts from Bryan until he brought it
> up. You gotta wonder why he sits around worrying about it.

I would not notice he was missing because I have had him filtered for
some time because he was just too bizarre. Over a period of a couple
weeks I was having to add a lot of new names to the filter because it
was a malicious nymshifting ass. I don't think it is a coincidence that
that stopped with his disappearance.




> They really need to take this stupid feud of theirs to private email.
> I've got both of them kf'd but someone *always* has to reply. And then,
> I can't help myself. LOL All that to say I agree with you, Cheri!

They needed to get a room. If everyone learned to ignore them, and if
they learned to filter each other, there would be a lot less of that
nonsense. Not that many of us had not already figured out Kuthe's
problem, one has to wonder why he would be upset about Bryan's
disappearance. You would expect a sane person to simply enjoy the silence.

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 11:51:25 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-06-03 11:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>
> >> Maybe YOU need the therapy since YOU are obsessing his absence.
> >>
> >> Cheri
> >
> > +1 I hadn't noticed the lack of posts from Bryan until he brought it
> > up. You gotta wonder why he sits around worrying about it.
>
> I would not notice he was missing because I have had him filtered for
> some time because he was just too bizarre. Over a period of a couple
> weeks I was having to add a lot of new names to the filter because it
> was a malicious nymshifting ass. I don't think it is a coincidence that
> that stopped with his disappearance.
>
>
>
>
> > They really need to take this stupid feud of theirs to private email.
> > I've got both of them kf'd but someone *always* has to reply. And then,
> > I can't help myself. LOL All that to say I agree with you, Cheri!
>
> They needed to get a room. If everyone learned to ignore them, and if
> they learned to filter each other, there would be a lot less of that
> nonsense. Not that many of us had not already figured out Kuthe's
> problem, one has to wonder why he would be upset about Bryan's
> disappearance. You would expect a sane person to simply enjoy the silence.

So you really don't care about anyone but yourself? Sad. :-(

John Kuthe...

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
> off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
> simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
> new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
> he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
> considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>
>
Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 11:51:25 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> On 2016-06-03 11:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>
> > I hadn't noticed the lack of posts from Bryan until he brought it
> > up.
>
> Over a period of a couple
> weeks I was having to add a lot of new names to the filter because it
> was a malicious nymshifting ass. I don't think it is a coincidence that
> that stopped with his disappearance.
>
+1
>
> one has to wonder why he would be upset about Bryan's
> disappearance. You would expect a sane person to simply enjoy the silence.
>
++1

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message

> I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.

Same here, no killfiles, but skipping some I don't wish to read on some
days. I don't mind JK so much, but B is a little weird IMO, OK...a lot
weird.

Cheri

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 1:09:43 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>
> > I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> > posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> > reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> > psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.
>
> Same here, no killfiles, but skipping some I don't wish to read on some
> days. I don't mind JK so much, but B is a little weird IMO, OK...a lot
> weird.
>
> Cheri

Yep, that's the way I do it too! I call it my "adaptive killfile".

And this is why Bryan finally launched into a brutal attack on me, I have a medical education now (BSN and am an RN) and I finally nailed it about Bryan something I've long suspected was quite wrong with him. It's certainly not that he's not very intelligent, which is something I always admired in him. But I correctly diagnosed his Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and if there's one thing an NPD sufferer hates it's being called on his bullshit! That is why he professes top hate me now, so much! Donald Drumpf is also NPD, imagine how fast he'd launch into a berating insulting attack on me of I called HIM on it!!

John Kuthe...

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> >
> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
> >
> >
> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?

I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!

John Kuthe...

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:08:21 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>
>> I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
>> posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
>> reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
>> psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.
>
>Same here, no killfiles, but skipping some I don't wish to read on some
>days. I don't mind JK so much, but B is a little weird IMO, OK...a lot
>weird.
>
>Cheri

The posts I skip most often are Bove's, whenever I see that she makes
more than a half dozen posts in any one thread I delete them all
unopened... she's verbose but says nothing, she's not at all
interesting, and has no sense of humor, if she ever smiled she'd have
yet another malady, CFS (Cracked Face
Syndrome). LOL Bove is not the only one here who takes themself way
too seriously.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:52:22 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:


>> They really need to take this stupid feud of theirs to private email.
>> I've got both of them kf'd but someone *always* has to reply. And then,
>> I can't help myself. LOL All that to say I agree with you, Cheri!
>
>They needed to get a room. If everyone learned to ignore them, and if
>they learned to filter each other, there would be a lot less of that
>nonsense. Not that many of us had not already figured out Kuthe's
>problem, one has to wonder why he would be upset about Bryan's
>disappearance. You would expect a sane person to simply enjoy the silence.

There's plenty of indication of a sexual history between the two of
them, what with their private drug escapades alone together, kinky
anecdotes, etc. Which would go a long way towards explaining what we
see here.

On 2016-06-03 1:37 PM, wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>> off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>> simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>> new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>> he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>> considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>>
>>
> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>

It was the workings of a lunatic mind and it earned him a permanent
place in the bozo bin.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote:

>On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>> >
>> >
>> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
>> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>
>I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!

OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 1:09:43 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> > "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> >
> > > I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> > > posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> > > reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> > > psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.
> >
> > Same here, no killfiles, but skipping some I don't wish to read on some
> > days. I don't mind JK so much, but B is a little weird IMO, OK...a lot
> > weird.
> >
> > Cheri
>
> Yep, that's the way I do it too! I call it my "adaptive killfile".
>
> And this is why Bryan finally launched into a brutal attack on me, I
> have a medical education now (BSN and am an RN) and I finally nailed
> it about Bryan something I've long suspected was quite wrong with him.
> It's certainly not that he's not very intelligent, which is something
> I always admired in him. But I correctly diagnosed his Narcissistic
> Personality Disorder

Everybody who reads ten of his posts, knows this. You're also not the
first one to say it here. But you are the first one to repeat it over
and over again as if you've invented the wheel. Get over yourself.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:52:22 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> I would not notice he was missing because I have had him filtered for
> some time because he was just too bizarre. Over a period of a couple
> weeks I was having to add a lot of new names to the filter because it
> was a malicious nymshifting ass. I don't think it is a coincidence that
> that stopped with his disappearance.

You're probably right. I had him filtered too, so I only noticed
there were no new names.

--

sf

On 2016-06-03 3:03 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>>>> off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>>>> simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>>>> new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>>>> he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>>>> considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>>> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>>> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>>> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>>> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
>>> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>>
>> I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>
> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>

Indeed. That is the sort of psychotic delusional rationale he exhibits
and the reason he has that permanent place in the bozo bin.

On 2016-06-03 3:35 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:52:22 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> I would not notice he was missing because I have had him filtered for
>> some time because he was just too bizarre. Over a period of a couple
>> weeks I was having to add a lot of new names to the filter because it
>> was a malicious nymshifting ass. I don't think it is a coincidence that
>> that stopped with his disappearance.
>
> You're probably right. I had him filtered too, so I only noticed
> there were no new names.
>

Perhaps the abuse reports got him booted.

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>
> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>
>
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
> >On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
> >> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
> >> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
> >> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
> >> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
> >> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
> >> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
> >> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
> >> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
> >> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
> >> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
> >
> >I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>
> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.

I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort, because the NOODS starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good, much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at all!


John Kuthe...

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:29:09 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 1:09:43 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> > > "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > > I don't use my newsreader's killfile, I've no problem not opening
> > > > posts from the very few I don't wish to read. I have no problem
> > > > reading both Kootchie and Bwrrryan, they're a good vaccination against
> > > > psychosis... anyone reading them will appreciate their own sanity.
> > >
> > > Same here, no killfiles, but skipping some I don't wish to read on some
> > > days. I don't mind JK so much, but B is a little weird IMO, OK...a lot
> > > weird.
> > >
> > > Cheri
> >
> > Yep, that's the way I do it too! I call it my "adaptive killfile".
> >
> > And this is why Bryan finally launched into a brutal attack on me, I
> > have a medical education now (BSN and am an RN) and I finally nailed
> > it about Bryan something I've long suspected was quite wrong with him.
> > It's certainly not that he's not very intelligent, which is something
> > I always admired in him. But I correctly diagnosed his Narcissistic
> > Personality Disorder
>
> Everybody who reads ten of his posts, knows this. You're also not the
> first one to say it here. But you are the first one to repeat it over
> and over again as if you've invented the wheel. Get over yourself.

I never saw anyone else diagnose Bryan with NPD. Only me. Not saying those do not exist, just that I never saw them.

John Kuthe...

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote:

>On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> >> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>> >> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>> >> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>> >> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>> >> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>> >> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>> >> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>> >> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>> >> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>> >> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
>> >> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>> >
>> >I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>>
>> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
>> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>
>I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort, because the NOODS starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good, much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at all!

Exactly, that's really not the best way to achieve the result you were
looking for

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 1:37:18 PM UTC-4, wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> >
> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
> >
> >
> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?

He's a simpleton.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:39:33 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-03 3:03 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>>>>> off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>>>>> simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>>>>> new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>>>>> he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>>>>> considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>>>> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>>>> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>>>> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>>>> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
>>>> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>>
>> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
>> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>>
>
>Indeed. That is the sort of psychotic delusional rationale he exhibits
>and the reason he has that permanent place in the bozo bin.

He's been getting more angry/aggressive lately too (although not today
from what I can see). Hopefully John is moving on from that phase.

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Je??us wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> >> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
>> >> > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
>> >> > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
>> >> > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
>> >> > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
>> >> > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>> >> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>> >> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>> >> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>> >> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
>> >> a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>> >
>> >I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or needed!
>>
>> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider noods
>> what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>
> I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort, because the NOODS starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good, much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at all!
>
>
> John Kuthe...


wtf is a nood ??

On 2016-06-03 3:56 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he
>>>>>> objected to an off topic thread going on too long. Instead
>>>>>> of filtering the subject or simply ignoring it, he ran a
>>>>>> tally and replied to each new post with the new tally, all
>>>>>> the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While he
>>>>>> is probably quite convinced that it was an act of
>>>>>> brilliance I considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick
>>>>>> mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>>>>> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>>>>> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>>>>> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>>>>> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like a
>>>>> dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>> I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably
>>>> several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to
>>>> RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their
>>>> private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how
>>>> stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or
>>>> needed!
>>>
>>> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider
>>> noods what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>>
>> I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort,


It was as fruity as it was fruitless.


>>because the NOODS
>> starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good,
>> much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at
>> all!
>
> Exactly, that's really not the best way to achieve the result you
> were looking for

I suspect the only result he was hoping for was that someone would read
it and reply.

On 2016-06-03 5:33 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:


>>
>> I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort, because the NOODS starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good, much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at all!
>>
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
>
> wtf is a nood ??
>

It is a cutesy word for nude, and in this case it would be a figment of
his imagination because I remember that there was a thread, but I never
saw any pictures in any of them, nor are there any in his real life that
don't involve drugs, alcohol and strange men.

On 6/3/2016 6:02 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-06-03 5:33 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort, because the NOODS
>>> starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good, much
>>> less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at all!
>>>
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>
>>
>> wtf is a nood ??
>>
>
> It is a cutesy word for nude, and in this case it would be a figment of
> his imagination because I remember that there was a thread, but I never
> saw any pictures in any of them, nor are there any in his real life that
> don't involve drugs, alcohol and strange men.

Huh... I thought he was referring to cross-posting trolls (or noobies).

Jill

On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:59:16 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 1:37:18 PM UTC-4, wrote:
> > On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he objected to an
> > > off topic thread going on too long. Instead of filtering the subject or
> > > simply ignoring it, he ran a tally and replied to each new post with the
> > > new tally, all the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While
> > > he is probably quite convinced that it was an act of brilliance I
> > > considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick mind.
> > >
> > >
> > Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
> > been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
> > 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
> > I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
> > replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like
> > a dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>
> He's a simpleton.

With three Bachelor's Degrees and GPAS of 3.46 and 3.64!

So certainly NOT a simpleton! Pretty astute I'd say!

John Kuthe...