On 2016-06-03 3:56 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 12:37:18 PM UTC-5,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kuthe was one of the first in mine and that was after he
>>>>>> objected to an off topic thread going on too long. Instead
>>>>>> of filtering the subject or simply ignoring it, he ran a
>>>>>> tally and replied to each new post with the new tally, all
>>>>>> the while almost doubling the number of OT posts. While he
>>>>>> is probably quite convinced that it was an act of
>>>>>> brilliance I considered it to be one of idiocy and a sick
>>>>>> mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh gawd, I remember that. For some reason he thought he had
>>>>> been appointed the net cop for this group and was going to
>>>>> 'teach us all a lesson' about posting to off topic subjects.
>>>>> I simply didn't understand his logic when he made sure HE
>>>>> replied to every reply to 'teach us a lesson.' Sounds like a
>>>>> dog chasing it's tail, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>> I knew exactly what I was doing with that. Some nood, probably
>>>> several noods, over in another newsgroup were CROSSPOSTING to
>>>> RFC some nonsense they were really only concerned with in their
>>>> private nood-world, so I was following suit to show then how
>>>> stupid it was to CROSSPOST crap where it was not wanted or
>>>> needed!
>>>
>>> OH. Well, that makes PERFECT sense, John. You show them outsider
>>> noods what for by flooding RFC with crap. Way to go! LOL.
>>
>> I must admit, it was a totally fruitless effort,


It was as fruity as it was fruitless.


>>because the NOODS
>> starting and perpetuating it probably can't even think so good,
>> much less modify their behavior. If they read any of my posts at
>> all!
>
> Exactly, that's really not the best way to achieve the result you
> were looking for

I suspect the only result he was hoping for was that someone would read
it and reply.