General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 615
Default JANET BOVINE TALKS ABOUT HER "Chickasaurus"

On 4/9/2016 11:41 AM, Janet Bovine wrote:
>
> I bought some boneless, skinless chicken breasts from Albertsons
> yesterday. They were $1.69/pound. It was a decent price so I got
> what I thought was a package of 8 -- 4 on top and 4 on the bottom.
> Not so. There were only 4 breasts in the package. I've weighed each
> one. 1.5 ounce was the heaviest and 1.4 was the least weighty. The
> cut looks like they are full breasts instead of the halves we are used
> to. Still, at 20 ounces for a full breast that means the halves would
> be 10 ounces and I am used to seeing 5-6 ounce breast pieces. So, if
> it was your chicken, would you figure these were really old birds and
> need a lot of stewing or would you just go ahead and cook as usual? I
> use this meat for enchilada filling and stuff like that
> Janet US
>

Janet, folks around these here parts call yer caboose an "assasaurus,"
on account it's got its own zip code.
Hmfh!

  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33,326
Default JANET BOVINE TALKS ABOUT HER "Chickasaurus"

On 4/12/2016 8:35 AM, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote:
> On 4/10/2016 12:36 PM, Mustaffa Sheboygan wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 4/9/2016 11:41 AM, Janet Bovine wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I bought some boneless, skinless chicken breasts from Albertsons
>>>> yesterday. They were $1.69/pound. It was a decent price so I got
>>>> what I thought was a package of 8 -- 4 on top and 4 on the bottom.
>>>> Not so. There were only 4 breasts in the package. I've weighed each
>>>> one. 1.5 ounce was the heaviest and 1.4 was the least weighty. The
>>>> cut looks like they are full breasts instead of the halves we are used
>>>> to. Still, at 20 ounces for a full breast that means the halves would
>>>> be 10 ounces and I am used to seeing 5-6 ounce breast pieces. So, if
>>>> it was your chicken, would you figure these were really old birds and
>>>> need a lot of stewing or would you just go ahead and cook as usual? I
>>>> use this meat for enchilada filling and stuff like that
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>> Janet, folks around these here parts call yer caboose an "assasaurus,"
>>> on account it's got its own zip code.
>>> Hmfh!

>>
>> Jeez... this woman is obsessed with food. She weighs it, she speculates
>> on its age... I'll bet she gnaws on it like a big brown beaver!
>>

>
> Wot about her big brown beaver?? Hmmmm?
>


Leash laws apply?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"