Janet B wrote:
>
> That is croquette methodology whether you like it or not. The shape
> doesn't matter. It's the fancy foreign word that bothers you and the
> fact that you said it was a southern thing. Then you said it wasn't
> common in other parts of the USA.
> "There is little cooked in the USA that isnt cooked elsewhere as well.
> The definition here it is not really the same croquette and it's not
> that common in other parts of the USA but may be common in Poland, UK,
> and other such places."
> Then you said that although a southern thing it was possible it wasn't
> known in Tennessee.
> How far are you going to walk this back?
> The only point here is that what you do with mashed potatoes is known
> elsewhere and is not strictly southern.
> Janet US

One of the more common I remember from childhood is the salmon
croquette, usually made with canned, back when canned fish used to be
dirt cheap... and still often stretched with mashed potato and canned
Veg-All. Croquettes regardless under what name are not indigenous to
any particular location but in fact to every location on the planet,
whether fried rice and abalone patties or fried maize and human flesh
patties used for religious ceremonies in the Yucatan... hey, Catholics
wolf down the body of Christ.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:23:42 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:20:46 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2016-03-20 10:46 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think I've ever seen mashed potato pancakes in a diner. I do
>>> know my Scottish grandmother made potato pancakes from leftover chilled
>>> mashed potatoes (so did my mother, so have I). My German grandmother
>>> made what you'd call latkes - made from shredded potatoes and crispy.
>>> Both, IMHO, are called potato pancakes.

Fried mashed potato patties were common at NYC grade school
cafeterias, a favorite aboard ship as was a tasty way to use dehy
granules.
>>
>>One of the big differences between the two is that latkes are usually
>>really good. When I was working we went on a number of training
>>sessions and one place in Orillia was a favourite because the food was
>>so good. A lot of their meals came with potato croquettes, and they
>>were delicious.
>>
>I always thought that there was a difference between potato pancakes
>and latkes. Now I am not so sure.
>Janet US

Rusty wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 3/20/2016 1:45 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:23:27 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote:
> > >
> >>> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > >
> >>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:28:02 -0500, "cshenk" >
> >> wrote: >>
> >>>>> notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > > > >
> >>>>>> On 2016-03-19, Janet B > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> I'm from the mid-west and we made croquettes (mashed potato
> >>>>>>> patties....
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> I don't know where you have the knowledge to declare that it
> >> is >> not >> > common elsewhere in the US.
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>> Apparently, it's not.
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>> I've never even heard of "mashed potato patties", let alone
> >> eaten >> one. >> This and I've lived in the USA all my life, never
> >> ran across >> 'em on >> the Left Coast or during the 2 yrs I lived
> in >> TN. >> >>
> >>>>>> nb
> > > > > >
> >>>>> It's a variation seem more often in some parts of the south,
> >> common >> > enough to be on simple diner menus. It is not a
> >> croquette treatment >> > per actual results though some add egg
> >> and/or a light flour batter >> > to the outside.
> > > > > >
> >>>>> Janet B is just upset for some odd reason about it. The ones I
> >>>>> refer to are more of a potato pancake (no flour).
> > > > > >
> >>>>> You cook them up along with the bacon.
> > > > >
> >>>> I take issue with you when you declare it something from the
> south >>>> and not seen elsewhere. There's nothing odd about that.
> >>>> photos:
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/j52zvjf
> >>>> plethora of recipes:
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/hyqvcz4
> > > > >
> >>>> If you prefer Mashed Potato Patties, they are all over the place
> as >>>> well.
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/gnt4ser
> > > > >
> >>>> Janet US
> > > >
> >>> Janet, those are croquettes. I was not posting about croquettes.
> > >
> >> What is it about 'mashed potato patties' that you don't understand?
> >
> > What I understand and you do not, is not every use of mashed
> > potatoes is a croquette. ALL the pictures you have are of
> > croquettes.
> >
>
> I am backing you, cshenk. My French Canadian Mother-in-law made
> potato pancakes as you make them (she called them "popettes). Just
> with leftover mashed potatoes and an egg and fried them up. Hubby
> would like me to make them but I have never made them.
>
> Rusty in Md

They are not hard to make Rusty. It's a basic leftover and only place I
see it is in the south but it's a natural here as it's close to how we
handle leftover grits. Here's your recipe.

1 cup leftover mashed potatoes
1 egg
optional is add a little onion
1-2 TB bacon fat or butter

Optional, roll in a little flour after shaping to a flat thin patty
(Some will actually use an eggwash and flour coating but it's not that
normal).

What you aim for is a delicate buttery or bacony crust on what is
generally a thin mashed potato bit.



--

Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:08:43 -0600, Janet B >
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:44:43 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >
> > > notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> >>> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Janet, those are croquettes. I was not posting about
> croquettes. >>>
> >>> Yes. Croquettes.
> >>>
> >>> The difference between a croquette and a potato patty is, the
> >>> croquette is allowed to have some actual flavor. Crab cakes,
> falafel, >>> etc, are common examples of croquesttes with flavor.
> You can call a >>> flattened scoop of potatoes (w/ flour?) whatever
> you desire, they're >>> stiil totally flavorless and completely suck.
> If I wanna eat a >>> starch-on-starch hockey puck, I'll take biscuits
> 'n gravy. >>>
> >>> nb
> > >
> > > You can like what you like and that is fine. I am not and never
> > > was talking about croquettes.
>
>
> You said "
> Another is a very southern sort of thing where you mash then add a
> little onion and an egg then make patties fried up to lightly crispy
> (often done in a light batter treatment).
>
> Carol"
>
> That is croquette methodology whether you like it or not. The shape
> doesn't matter. It's the fancy foreign word that bothers you and the
> fact that you said it was a southern thing. Then you said it wasn't
> common in other parts of the USA.
> "There is little cooked in the USA that isnt cooked elsewhere as well.
> The definition here it is not really the same croquette and it's not
> that common in other parts of the USA but may be common in Poland, UK,
> and other such places."
> Then you said that although a southern thing it was possible it wasn't
> known in Tennessee.
> How far are you going to walk this back?
> The only point here is that what you do with mashed potatoes is known
> elsewhere and is not strictly southern.
> Janet US

Whatever Janet.

--

Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:23:12 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
> >>
> >> > You can like what you like and that is fine.
> >>
> >> Well, that is mighty generous of you!
> >>
> >> > I am not and never was talking about croquettes.
> >>
> >> Oh. That part where you posted, "Janet, those are croquettes.",
> >> kinda threw me. Sorry.
> >>
> >> nb
> >
> > Sorry but this has gotten to be an idiotic discussion. Janet took
> > the use of left over mashed potatoes and assumed it was a croquette
> > and took off from there.
> >
> > She's now even gone so far as to make insulting bovine comments but
> > the item I posted is a simple sort of thing. It is not a croquette
> > nor did i ever say it was. It's simply something she is not
> > familiar with so took an assumed relation to something else.
>
> I never said nor implied bovine (meaning cow) Sheesh!. I said
> bovery, which was a reference to Julie oft making a claim that
> something was not known elsewhere in the US. And for heaven's sake,
> everybody knows potato patties, or whatever you want to call them i
> choose to make the croquette because I know how and can do it. That's
> the point. You said what you made was not known outside of the south.
> At this point, I am very sorry that I used a term outside of your
> knowledge, I certainly had no ulterior motive.
> Janet US

I do not care what you have to say on this thread. You were rude to me
with no cause. I am over it. You do not get it that it was a
different item and i get it that you do not get it. You are now rude
again in assumption that I do not know what a croquette is. I sent you
PICTURES of them to show the difference!

Whatever...


--

On 3/20/2016 5:25 PM, cshenk wrote:
> 1 cup leftover mashed potatoes
> 1 egg
> optional is add a little onion
> 1-2 TB bacon fat or butter
>
> Optional, roll in a little flour after shaping to a flat thin patty
> (Some will actually use an eggwash and flour coating but it's not that
> normal).
>
> What you aim for is a delicate buttery or bacony crust on what is
> generally a thin mashed potato bit.
>
Okay, thanks for that. This is not anything like what I'm familiar
with. One cup of leftover mashed potatoes and 1 egg well... that ratio
is off from what I'm familiar with. It sure isn't something I've
encountered here in the South.

Jill

On 3/20/2016 4:38 PM, jmcquown wrote:

>>>
>>>
>>> One of the big differences between the two is that latkes are usually
>>> really good. When I was working we went on a number of training
>>> sessions and one place in Orillia was a favourite because the food was
>>> so good. A lot of their meals came with potato croquettes, and they
>>> were delicious.
>>>
>> I always thought that there was a difference between potato pancakes
>> and latkes. Now I am not so sure.
>> Janet US
>>
> I was replying to Cindy's description of in which she said she ordered
> potato pancakes at a diner and she was *expecting* something akin to
> latkes and wound up with mashed potato pancakes.
>
> I've never made latkes. I'm not sure what Grandma McQuown made were
> technically latkes. She just called them potato pancakes.
>
> Jill

Latke is the Jewish name for a pancake made with shredded potato flour,
eff.. In English they are called potato pancakes.

Potato pancakes, however, has other meanings in the US. They can be made
from mashed. Wikipedia defines them: Potato pancakes are sometimes
made from mashed potatoes to produce pancake-shaped croquettes.[1]

The definition is a bit loose, but so far, to my knowledge, no one has
been arrested for using the wrong terms. That could happen by the end
of this thread though.

On 3/20/2016 6:47 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 3/20/2016 4:38 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One of the big differences between the two is that latkes are usually
>>>> really good. When I was working we went on a number of training
>>>> sessions and one place in Orillia was a favourite because the food was
>>>> so good. A lot of their meals came with potato croquettes, and they
>>>> were delicious.
>>>>
>>> I always thought that there was a difference between potato pancakes
>>> and latkes. Now I am not so sure.
>>> Janet US
>>>
>> I was replying to Cindy's description of in which she said she ordered
>> potato pancakes at a diner and she was *expecting* something akin to
>> latkes and wound up with mashed potato pancakes.
>>
>> I've never made latkes. I'm not sure what Grandma McQuown made were
>> technically latkes. She just called them potato pancakes.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Latke is the Jewish name for a pancake made with shredded potato flour,
> eff.. In English they are called potato pancakes.
>
> Potato pancakes, however, has other meanings in the US. They can be made
> from mashed. Wikipedia defines them: Potato pancakes are sometimes
> made from mashed potatoes to produce pancake-shaped croquettes.[1]
>
> The definition is a bit loose, but so far, to my knowledge, no one has
> been arrested for using the wrong terms. That could happen by the end
> of this thread though.

I know the definition is loose. I don't call them croquettes but I knew
what Janet and Cindy meant when using the terms for various types of
potato pancakes.

Jill

On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 2:54:47 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
> On 20/03/2016 12:16 PM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 12:22:48 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
> >> On 19/03/2016 11:03 AM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> >>> On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 7:34:18 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> At that same time I posted my version only I don't like the mustard
> >>>> cooked, I think cooking ruins a quality mustard.
> >>>
> >>> I agree 100%. Cooking mustard is wrong.
> >>>
> >>> --Bryan
> >>>
> >> It depends! Kidneys in mustard sauce are delicious.
> >> Graham
> >
> > Kidneys are nasty **** factories.
> >
> > --Bryan
> >
> Then stick to Big Macs:-)

Because they don't put innards in their burgers? Even if one agrees that a
Quarter Pounder is awful, at least it's not offal.

--Bryan

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 3/20/2016 6:42 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> I've even seen them in diners, masquerading as "potato pancakes".
>> It's a really shock to get them when you're expecting latkes or
>> at least hash browns formed into a cake and deep fried.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> I don't think I've ever seen mashed potato pancakes in a diner. I do know
> my Scottish grandmother made potato pancakes from leftover chilled mashed
> potatoes (so did my mother, so have I). My German grandmother made what
> you'd call latkes - made from shredded potatoes and crispy. Both, IMHO,
> are called potato pancakes.
>
> Jill

I haven't even seen too many potato pancakes in restaurants around here. I
have seen them a few times but would never order them as I have seen what
others got when they did. You just never know what they might be or what
might be put in them. In PA, you'll get shredded potatoes made into a cake.
Here, you might get something more akin to a pancake with some form of
potato in it but they're not even like the mashed potato kind. They're just
usually weird.

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
>
>> Janet, those are croquettes. I was not posting about croquettes.
>
> Yes. Croquettes.
>
> The difference between a croquette and a potato patty is, the
> croquette is allowed to have some actual flavor. Crab cakes, falafel,
> etc, are common examples of croquesttes with flavor. You can call a
> flattened scoop of potatoes (w/ flour?) whatever you desire, they're
> stiil totally flavorless and completely suck. If I wanna eat a
> starch-on-starch hockey puck, I'll take biscuits 'n gravy.
>
> nb

Agree. I have made the little mashed potato patties a few times. Even if I
try to doctor them up, they are just as boring as when my mom made them.
Fine, I suppose if I am broke and have no other food in the house but
otherwise, no. Thankfully, I wised up and realized that I am the only
mashed potato lover in the house and to make less than I think we will eat.
That's always the right amount.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
>>
>> > You can like what you like and that is fine.
>>
>> Well, that is mighty generous of you!
>>
>> > I am not and never was talking about croquettes.
>>
>> Oh. That part where you posted, "Janet, those are croquettes.",
>> kinda threw me. Sorry.
>>
>> nb
>
> Sorry but this has gotten to be an idiotic discussion. Janet took the
> use of left over mashed potatoes and assumed it was a croquette and
> took off from there.
>
> She's now even gone so far as to make insulting bovine comments but the
> item I posted is a simple sort of thing. It is not a croquette nor did
> i ever say it was. It's simply something she is not familiar with so
> took an assumed relation to something else.

Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept
insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it is another matter of
calling something by a different name depending on where you live. I had to
look something up last night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What
made it even more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese dish and
didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American equivalent to the
word was "scallop".

"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:08:43 -0600, Janet B >
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:44:43 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>>notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Janet, those are croquettes. I was not posting about croquettes.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Croquettes.
>>>>
>>>> The difference between a croquette and a potato patty is, the
>>>> croquette is allowed to have some actual flavor. Crab cakes, falafel,
>>>> etc, are common examples of croquesttes with flavor. You can call a
>>>> flattened scoop of potatoes (w/ flour?) whatever you desire, they're
>>>> stiil totally flavorless and completely suck. If I wanna eat a
>>>> starch-on-starch hockey puck, I'll take biscuits 'n gravy.
>>>>
>>>> nb
>>>
>>>You can like what you like and that is fine. I am not and never was
>>>talking about croquettes.
>
>
> You said "
> Another is a very southern sort of thing where you mash then add a
> little onion and an egg then make patties fried up to lightly crispy
> (often done in a light batter treatment).
>
> Carol"
>
> That is croquette methodology whether you like it or not. The shape
> doesn't matter. It's the fancy foreign word that bothers you and the
> fact that you said it was a southern thing. Then you said it wasn't
> common in other parts of the USA.
> "There is little cooked in the USA that isnt cooked elsewhere as well.
> The definition here it is not really the same croquette and it's not
> that common in other parts of the USA but may be common in Poland, UK,
> and other such places."
> Then you said that although a southern thing it was possible it wasn't
> known in Tennessee.
> How far are you going to walk this back?
> The only point here is that what you do with mashed potatoes is known
> elsewhere and is not strictly southern.
> Janet US

I would disagree. I used to make croquettes and they were not patties.
Heck, even the chicken ones that I used to buy were not patties. The
cookbooks I have indicate the various shapes you can make them in. Balls,
balls with flattered bottoms (my preference), logs or pyramids. Mine had no
batter but they were rolled in egg and breadcrumbs. Mine were also baked
and not fried.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 3/20/2016 2:23 PM, Janet B wrote:
>> You said "
>> Another is a very southern sort of thing where you mash then add a
>> little onion and an egg then make patties fried up to lightly crispy
>> (often done in a light batter treatment).
>>
>> Carol"
>>
>> That is croquette methodology whether you like it or not. The shape
>> doesn't matter. It's the fancy foreign word that bothers you and the
>> fact that you said it was a southern thing. Then you said it wasn't
>> common in other parts of the USA.
>> "There is little cooked in the USA that isnt cooked elsewhere as well.
>> The definition here it is not really the same croquette and it's not
>> that common in other parts of the USA but may be common in Poland, UK,
>> and other such places."
>> Then you said that although a southern thing it was possible it wasn't
>> known in Tennessee.
>> How far are you going to walk this back?
>> The only point here is that what you do with mashed potatoes is known
>> elsewhere and is not strictly southern.
>> Janet US
>
> It's getting kinda dull, isn't it? Leftover mashed potatoes with onion
> and egg added then pan fried by any name are not limited to specific
> regions.
>
> Jill

They might be more commonly served in the South. I don't really know. I
haven't ever heard of anyone around here talking about them. Then again,
they're not very exciting.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:23:27 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:28:02 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote: >>
>> >> > notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 2016-03-19, Janet B > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I'm from the mid-west and we made croquettes (mashed potato
>> >> >> > patties....
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I don't know where you have the knowledge to declare that it
>> is >> not >> > common elsewhere in the US.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Apparently, it's not.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've never even heard of "mashed potato patties", let alone
>> eaten >> one. >> This and I've lived in the USA all my life, never
>> ran across >> 'em on >> the Left Coast or during the 2 yrs I lived in
>> TN. >> >>
>> >> >> nb
>> >> >
>> >> > It's a variation seem more often in some parts of the south,
>> common >> > enough to be on simple diner menus. It is not a
>> croquette treatment >> > per actual results though some add egg
>> and/or a light flour batter >> > to the outside.
>> >> >
>> >> > Janet B is just upset for some odd reason about it. The ones I
>> >> > refer to are more of a potato pancake (no flour).
>> >> >
>> >> > You cook them up along with the bacon.
>> >>
>> >> I take issue with you when you declare it something from the south
>> >> and not seen elsewhere. There's nothing odd about that.
>> >> photos:
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/j52zvjf
>> >> plethora of recipes:
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/hyqvcz4
>> >>
>> >> If you prefer Mashed Potato Patties, they are all over the place as
>> >> well.
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/gnt4ser
>> >>
>> >> Janet US
>> >
>> > Janet, those are croquettes. I was not posting about croquettes.
>>
>> What is it about 'mashed potato patties' that you don't understand?
>
> What I understand and you do not, is not every use of mashed potatoes
> is a croquette. ALL the pictures you have are of croquettes.

I am even more confused. The first set of pics are for croquettes and the
second is for patties.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 3/20/2016 5:25 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> 1 cup leftover mashed potatoes
>> 1 egg
>> optional is add a little onion
>> 1-2 TB bacon fat or butter
>>
>> Optional, roll in a little flour after shaping to a flat thin patty
>> (Some will actually use an eggwash and flour coating but it's not that
>> normal).
>>
>> What you aim for is a delicate buttery or bacony crust on what is
>> generally a thin mashed potato bit.
>>
> Okay, thanks for that. This is not anything like what I'm familiar with.
> One cup of leftover mashed potatoes and 1 egg well... that ratio is off
> from what I'm familiar with. It sure isn't something I've encountered
> here in the South.

That's not how we make them either. May or may not have egg in there.
Might have cheese. I would add onion and probably parsley. My mom would
not. We make the patties and dip in flour before frying. If not using
eggs, you have to make tiny patties or they won't hold together. IIRC, some
recipes have you add flour to the potatoes but that just makes them even
more bland and chalky.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

snip
>
>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept
>insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it is another matter of
>calling something by a different name depending on where you live. I had to
>look something up last night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What
>made it even more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese dish and
>didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American equivalent to the
>word was "scallop".

You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere else.
I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
Janet US

"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
> snip
>>
>>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she
>>kept
>>insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it is another matter of
>>calling something by a different name depending on where you live. I had
>>to
>>look something up last night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What
>>made it even more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish
>>was
>>thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese dish and
>>didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American equivalent to the
>>word was "scallop".
>
> You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere else.
> I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> Janet US

When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it was
but it did happen.

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> > snip
> >>
> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she
> >>kept
> >>insisting that they were croquettes.

> >
> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere else.
> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> > Janet US
>
> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it was
> but it did happen.

you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater
Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."

Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.

Janet UK

Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
> >
> > snip
> > >
> > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
> > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
> > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
> > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
> > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
> > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
> > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
> > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".
> >
> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> > Janet US
>
> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
> it was but it did happen.

Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.

--

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > snip
>> >>
>> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she
>> >>kept
>> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
>
>> >
>> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere else.
>> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> > Janet US
>>
>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it
>> was
>> but it did happen.
>
> you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater
> Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
>
> Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
>
> Janet UK

The word was "we", not "she". I know that the subject came up on this group
before.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>>
>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > snip
>> > >
>> > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>> > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
>> > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
>> > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
>> > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
>> > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>> > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
>> > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
>> > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>> >
>> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> > Janet US
>>
>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>> it was but it did happen.
>
> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.

Thank you.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
> >
> > "Janet B" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > snip
> > > >
> > > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> > > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
> > > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
> > > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
> > > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
> > > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
> > > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
> > > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
> > > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".

escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
> > >
> > > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> > > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> > > Janet US
> >
> > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
> > it was but it did happen.
>
> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.

Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...

--

sf

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>> >
>> > "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > snip
>> > > >
>> > > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>> > > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
>> > > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
>> > > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
>> > > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
>> > > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>> > > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
>> > > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
>> > > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>
> escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
>> > >
>> > > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> > > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> > > Janet US
>> >
>> > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>> > it was but it did happen.
>>
>> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
>
> Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
> anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
> not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
> equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
> cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
> bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...

I tend to get the Janets mixed up because they are equally not nice.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:59:06 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>> >
>> > "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > snip
>> > > >
>> > > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>> > > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
>> > > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
>> > > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
>> > > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
>> > > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>> > > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
>> > > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
>> > > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>
>escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
>> > >
>> > > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> > > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> > > Janet US
>> >
>> > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>> > it was but it did happen.
>>
>> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
>
>Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
>anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
>not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
>equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
>cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
>bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...

Yes, wait, you're describing yourself!

On 2016-03-22 9:16 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:59:06 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>>>>>> where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
>>>>>> is another matter of calling something by a different name
>>>>>> depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
>>>>>> night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
>>>>>> more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>>>>>> thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
>>>>>> dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
>>>>>> equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>>
>> escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
>>>>>
>>>>> You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>>>>> else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>>>> it was but it did happen.
>>>
>>> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
>>
>> Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
>> anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
>> not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
>> equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
>> cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
>> bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...
>
> Yes, wait, you're describing yourself!
>

I had difficulty appreciating the difference between croquettes and
tater tots. They are both cylinders of potato. Once uses mashed and
the other uses grated. Home fries and hash browns seem to have
similarly blurry distinctions.

On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 10:19:24 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> "cshenk" > wrote in message
> ...
> > notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On 2016-03-20, cshenk > wrote:
> >>
> >> > You can like what you like and that is fine.
> >>
> >> Well, that is mighty generous of you!
> >>
> >> > I am not and never was talking about croquettes.
> >>
> >> Oh. That part where you posted, "Janet, those are croquettes.",
> >> kinda threw me. Sorry.
> >>
> >> nb
> >
> > Sorry but this has gotten to be an idiotic discussion. Janet took the
> > use of left over mashed potatoes and assumed it was a croquette and
> > took off from there.
> >
> > She's now even gone so far as to make insulting bovine comments but the
> > item I posted is a simple sort of thing. It is not a croquette nor did
> > i ever say it was. It's simply something she is not familiar with so
> > took an assumed relation to something else.
>
> Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept
> insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it is another matter of
> calling something by a different name depending on where you live. I had to
> look something up last night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What
> made it even more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
> thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese dish and
> didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American equivalent to the
> word was "scallop".

Vegans don't eat cheese, dummy.

--Bryan

On 3/22/2016 9:37 AM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:

> Vegans don't eat cheese, dummy.
>
> --Bryan
>
STFU you MORON!

http://www.onegreenplanet.org/vegan-...our-socks-off/

You want pizza with “cheese,” but the pizza chain you hit doesn’t offer
vegan options. You eat a sandwich and want to add an additional savory
flavor to the stack, but don’t have vegan cheese. You are at a party and
see incredibly delicious looking cheese slices enticing you to take a
bite. You cringe at not being able to have the savory, creamy taste of
cheese again. Until…

…vegan cheese comes to the rescue! Learn how to make fantastic, savory
cheese logs to raw vegan cheese that will blow your mind. These vegan
cheese recipes will not only satisfy your craving for cheese, without
the animal cruelty, but might also fool guests at your next
get-together. These vegan cheeses are pure and easy to prep and put
together.

No need to buy store-bought vegan cheeses with these recipes.

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > snip
> >> >>
> >> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she
> >> >>kept
> >> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
> >
> >> >
> >> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere else.
> >> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> >> > Janet US
> >>
> >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it
> >> was
> >> but it did happen.
> >
> > you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater
> > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
> >
> > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> The word was "we", not "she".

Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting

"I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
that they were croquettes"

JANET uk

On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:58:57 PM UTC-10, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > >
> > > "Janet B" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > snip
> > > > >
> > > > > Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> > > > > where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
> > > > > is another matter of calling something by a different name
> > > > > depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
> > > > > night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
> > > > > more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
> > > > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
> > > > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
> > > > > equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>
> escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
> > > >
> > > > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> > > > else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> > > > Janet US
> > >
> > > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
> > > it was but it did happen.
> >
> > Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
>
> Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
> anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
> not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
> equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
> cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
> bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...
>
> --
>
> sf

The croquettes sold in Japan come in different shapes. This is done to identify the different types. Some are curry, some are cream, some are beef. As a practical matter, I can make a croquette in the shape of a T-rex and it would still be a croquette and not a dinosaur.

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> t...
>> > In article >, says...
>> >>
>> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > snip
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where
>> >> >>she
>> >> >>kept
>> >> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> >> > else.
>> >> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> >> > Janet US
>> >>
>> >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it
>> >> was
>> >> but it did happen.
>> >
>> > you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater
>> > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
>> >
>> > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
>> >
>> > Janet UK
>>
>> The word was "we", not "she".
>
> Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting
>
> "I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
> that they were croquettes"
>
> JANET uk

My mistake. I actually thought it was you who make the original post. And
I thought it was you who kept insisting. Now I can't say for sure who it
was but I do know that it happened and I have been backed up on this by
cshenk so STFU.

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> "Janet" > wrote in message
> >> t...
> >> > In article >, says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > snip
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where
> >> >> >>she
> >> >> >>kept
> >> >> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> >> >> > else.
> >> >> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> >> >> > Janet US
> >> >>
> >> >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it
> >> >> was
> >> >> but it did happen.
> >> >
> >> > you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater
> >> > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
> >> >
> >> > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
> >> >
> >> > Janet UK
> >>
> >> The word was "we", not "she".
> >
> > Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting
> >
> > "I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
> > that they were croquettes"
> >
> > JANET uk
>
> My mistake. I actually thought it was you who make the original post. And
> I thought it was you who kept insisting.

You were still wrong. I've never discussed tatertots here either; I
don't eat your kind of crap.

Now I can't say for sure who it
> was but I do know that it happened and I have been backed up on this by
> cshenk so STFU.

Why not just apologise to the people you wrongly accused of something
they never said ?

Janet UK

On 3/22/2016 1:57 PM, Janet wrote:

> In article >, says...
>>
>> [...]
>
> Now I can't say for sure who it
>> was but I do know that it happened and I have been backed up on this by
>> cshenk so STFU.
>
> Why not just apologise to the people you wrongly accused of something
> they never said ?

It's far easier for Joolie to get all butthurt and hostile about
something like this than to simply admit the error and apologi{s|z}e.

That's why.

Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> > >
> >>"Janet" > wrote in message
> > > t...
> >>> In article >,
> says...
> > > > >
> >>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > snip
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> where >> >>she >>>> >>kept
> >>>> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
> > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from
> somewhere >> > else. >>>> > I have never discussed tater tots in a
> group. >>>> > Janet US
> > > > >
> >>>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember
> who it >>>> was
> >>>> but it did happen.
> > > >
> >>> you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with
> Tater >>> Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
> > > >
> >>> Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
> > > >
> >>> Janet UK
> > >
> > > The word was "we", not "she".
> >
> > Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting
> >
> > "I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
> > that they were croquettes"
> >
> > JANET uk
>
> My mistake. I actually thought it was you who make the original
> post. And I thought it was you who kept insisting. Now I can't say
> for sure who it was but I do know that it happened and I have been
> backed up on this by cshenk so STFU.

It did, something like a year ago? I do NOT recall who was in on the
conversation. There were a fair number of posts and it was all silly.

--

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:30:23 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> On 2016-03-22 9:16 AM, wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:59:06 -0700, sf > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> snip
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> >>>>>> where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
> >>>>>> is another matter of calling something by a different name
> >>>>>> depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
> >>>>>> night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
> >>>>>> more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
> >>>>>> thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
> >>>>>> dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
> >>>>>> equivalent to the word was "scallop".
> >>
> >> escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> >>>>> else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> >>>>> Janet US
> >>>>
> >>>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
> >>>> it was but it did happen.
> >>>
> >>> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
> >>
> >> Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
> >> anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
> >> not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
> >> equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
> >> cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
> >> bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...
> >
> > Yes, wait, you're describing yourself!
> >
>
> I had difficulty appreciating the difference between croquettes and
> tater tots. They are both cylinders of potato. Once uses mashed and
> the other uses grated. Home fries and hash browns seem to have
> similarly blurry distinctions.
>
lucretiaborgia is a top tier example of someone who talks out her ass.

--

sf

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:33:04 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:30:23 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-22 9:16 AM, wrote:
>> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:59:06 -0700, sf > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:57:31 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> >>>> ...
>> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> >>>>> > wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> snip
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>> >>>>>> where she kept insisting that they were croquettes. Perhaps it
>> >>>>>> is another matter of calling something by a different name
>> >>>>>> depending on where you live. I had to look something up last
>> >>>>>> night because I was unfamiliar with the name. What made it even
>> >>>>>> more odd was that it was a UK vegan dish but the real dish was
>> >>>>>> thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese
>> >>>>>> dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American
>> >>>>>> equivalent to the word was "scallop".
>> >>
>> >> escalope = scaloppa/scallopini
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> >>>>> else. I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> >>>>> Janet US
>> >>>>
>> >>>> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>> >>>> it was but it did happen.
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it.
>> >>
>> >> Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that
>> >> anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's
>> >> not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be
>> >> equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't
>> >> cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a
>> >> bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait...
>> >
>> > Yes, wait, you're describing yourself!
>> >
>>
>> I had difficulty appreciating the difference between croquettes and
>> tater tots. They are both cylinders of potato. Once uses mashed and
>> the other uses grated. Home fries and hash browns seem to have
>> similarly blurry distinctions.
>>
>lucretiaborgia is a top tier example of someone who talks out her ass.

Go play on fools book !

On 3/22/2016 5:55 PM, wrote:
>> lucretiaborgia is a top tier example of someone who talks out her ass.
> Go play on fools book !

STFU, you rich bitch swiss boarding school ****!

What would "David" say?

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> t...
>> > In article >, says...
>> >>
>> >> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> >> t...
>> >> > In article >,
>> >> > says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > snip
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
>> >> >> >>where
>> >> >> >>she
>> >> >> >>kept
>> >> >> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
>> >> >> > else.
>> >> >> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
>> >> >> > Janet US
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> was
>> >> >> but it did happen.
>> >> >
>> >> > you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with
>> >> > Tater
>> >> > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
>> >> >
>> >> > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
>> >> >
>> >> > Janet UK
>> >>
>> >> The word was "we", not "she".
>> >
>> > Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting
>> >
>> > "I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
>> > that they were croquettes"
>> >
>> > JANET uk
>>
>> My mistake. I actually thought it was you who make the original post.
>> And
>> I thought it was you who kept insisting.
>
> You were still wrong. I've never discussed tatertots here either; I
> don't eat your kind of crap.
>
> Now I can't say for sure who it
>> was but I do know that it happened and I have been backed up on this by
>> cshenk so STFU.
>
> Why not just apologise to the people you wrongly accused of something
> they never said ?
>
> Janet UK

Somebody said it. Not sure who.

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> "Janet" > wrote in message
> >> t...
> >> > In article >, says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Janet" > wrote in message
> >> >> t...
> >> >> > In article >,
> >> >> > says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:19:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > snip
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots
> >> >> >> >>where
> >> >> >> >>she
> >> >> >> >>kept
> >> >> >> >>insisting that they were croquettes.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > You're thinking of someone else from another time from somewhere
> >> >> >> > else.
> >> >> >> > I have never discussed tater tots in a group.
> >> >> >> > Janet US
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> but it did happen.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with
> >> >> > Tater
> >> >> > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes."
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Janet UK
> >> >>
> >> >> The word was "we", not "she".
> >> >
> >> > Your post is clear; you wrote SHE kept insisting
> >> >
> >> > "I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting
> >> > that they were croquettes"
> >> >
> >> > JANET uk
> >>
> >> My mistake. I actually thought it was you who make the original post.
> >> And
> >> I thought it was you who kept insisting.
> >
> > You were still wrong. I've never discussed tatertots here either; I
> > don't eat your kind of crap.
> >
> > Now I can't say for sure who it
> >> was but I do know that it happened and I have been backed up on this by
> >> cshenk so STFU.
> >
> > Why not just apologise to the people you wrongly accused of something
> > they never said ?
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> Somebody said it. Not sure who.

Neither of the people you claimed said it. Yesterday, you claimed
you were talking about my posts in the potato croquette discussion.
Complete fantasy on your part. I had not even taken part in the thread.

You obviously have some serious mental problems going on, Julie,
maybe related to your diabetes or blood sugar or thyroid problem.
Get a grip, woman, and stop blaming other people for your mental
deterioration.

Janet UK

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 7:03:19 PM UTC-5, anomaly wrote:
> On 3/22/2016 5:55 PM, wrote:
> >> lucretiaborgia is a top tier example of someone who talks out her ass.
> > Go play on fools book !
>
> STFU, you rich bitch swiss boarding school ****!
>
> What would "David" say?

But you love rich people who send their kids to boarding school.

--Bryan