On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona wrote:
>> On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org because all
>>>> spammers come from there but the 'whatever' persons are also pretending
>>>> there to come from valid addresses.
>>>>
>>>> What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue who
>>>> actually needs help.
>>>>
>>>> To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on, then go
>>>> away.
>>>
>>> Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including the full
>>> headers of the post:
>>>
>>> ";
>>>
>>> It might have some effect.
>>
>> Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul you
>> would not be such a loser.
>
> The American ideal of free speech pertains to government restriction
> on speech.

No.

It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect ALL free
speech at the ultimate firewall level.

Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to endorse
crass censorship.

> It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> that comes out of your piehole.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

No one said you had to, did they?

Well?????

You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all of my
posts if you wish.

But do NOT attempt to censor me.

That would be a MASSIVE mistake.

Capisce?

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:54:07 PM UTC-4, La Llorona wrote:
> On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona wrote:
> >> On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> >>> On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org because all
> >>>> spammers come from there but the 'whatever' persons are also pretending
> >>>> there to come from valid addresses.
> >>>>
> >>>> What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue who
> >>>> actually needs help.
> >>>>
> >>>> To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on, then go
> >>>> away.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including the full
> >>> headers of the post:
> >>>
> >>> ";
> >>>
> >>> It might have some effect.
> >>
> >> Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul you
> >> would not be such a loser.
> >
> > The American ideal of free speech pertains to government restriction
> > on speech.
>
> No.
>
> It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect ALL free
> speech at the ultimate firewall level.
>
> Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to endorse
> crass censorship.
>
> > It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> > that comes out of your piehole.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> No one said you had to, did they?

Of course not. And you are not required to listen to what
comes out of my piehole.

> Well?????
>
> You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all of my
> posts if you wish.
>
> But do NOT attempt to censor me.

I don't have the power to censor you, but your ISP certainly does.

> That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
>
> Capisce?

I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
this one be intimidating?

Cindy Hamilton

On 9/16/2015 1:17 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:54:07 PM UTC-4, La Llorona wrote:
>> On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona wrote:
>>>> On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org because all
>>>>>> spammers come from there but the 'whatever' persons are also pretending
>>>>>> there to come from valid addresses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue who
>>>>>> actually needs help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on, then go
>>>>>> away.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including the full
>>>>> headers of the post:
>>>>>
>>>>> ";
>>>>>
>>>>> It might have some effect.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul you
>>>> would not be such a loser.
>>>
>>> The American ideal of free speech pertains to government restriction
>>> on speech.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect ALL free
>> speech at the ultimate firewall level.
>>
>> Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to endorse
>> crass censorship.
>>
>>> It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
>>> that comes out of your piehole.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> No one said you had to, did they?
>
> Of course not. And you are not required to listen to what
> comes out of my piehole.

But I choose to because the insights are often quite sound.

>> Well?????
>>
>> You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all of my
>> posts if you wish.
>>
>> But do NOT attempt to censor me.
>
> I don't have the power to censor you, but your ISP certainly does.

If you're threatening my ability to maintain my chosen ISP and
consequently my work connectivity you are making a HUGE mistake.

>> That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
>>
>> Capisce?
>
> I've made many mistakes in my life.

And you wish to make more?

> Why should the prospect of
> this one be intimidating?
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Immediate and withering legal action.

Want some?

Bring it.

La Llorona wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 9/16/2015 1:17 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:54:07 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > wrote:
> > > On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> > > > > > On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all
> > > > > > > aioe.org because all spammers come from there but the
> > > > > > > 'whatever' persons are also pretending there to come from
> > > > > > > valid addresses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What we have is a person with a serious mental health
> > > > > > > issue who actually needs help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that
> > > > > > > on, then go away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address,
> > > > > > including the full headers of the post:
> > > > > >
> >>>>> ";
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It might have some effect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your
> > > > > soul you would not be such a loser.
> > > >
> > > > The American ideal of free speech pertains to government
> > > > restriction on speech.
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect
> > > ALL free speech at the ultimate firewall level.
> > >
> > > Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to
> > > endorse crass censorship.
> > >
> > > > It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> > > > that comes out of your piehole.
> > > >
> > > > Cindy Hamilton
> > >
> > > No one said you had to, did they?
> >
> > Of course not. And you are not required to listen to what
> > comes out of my piehole.
>
> But I choose to because the insights are often quite sound.
>
> > > Well?????
> > >
> > > You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all
> > > of my posts if you wish.
> > >
> > > But do NOT attempt to censor me.
> >
> > I don't have the power to censor you, but your ISP certainly does.
>
> If you're threatening my ability to maintain my chosen ISP and
> consequently my work connectivity you are making a HUGE mistake.
>
> > > That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
> > >
> > > Capisce?
> >
> > I've made many mistakes in my life.
>
> And you wish to make more?
>
> > Why should the prospect of
> > this one be intimidating?
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> Immediate and withering legal action.
>
> Want some?
>
> Bring it.

Oh please, quit being a CHILD. Try and sue me. Just try it.

--

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
> this one be intimidating?
>
> Cindy Hamilton

United States, Wisconsin, Madison
On Oldfield Rd, yes?

Sqwertz wrote:
> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>> this one be intimidating?
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> United States, Wisconsin, Madison
> On Oldfield Rd, yes?
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:27 -0600, Sqwertz's forger wrote:

> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>> this one be intimidating?
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> United States, Wisconsin, Madison....

Posting somebody's address under a forged nym just because she said
boo to you. You really have gone off the deep end and are opening up
yourself to prosecution for stalking. You need to start taking your
meds and snap out of it, dude. Complaints to for
starters.

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:53:30 -0500, Usenet Support Personnel
> wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:27 -0600, Sqwertz's forger wrote:
>
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>>> this one be intimidating?
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> United States, Wisconsin, Madison....
>
>Posting somebody's address under a forged nym just because she said
>boo to you. You really have gone off the deep end and are opening up
>yourself to prosecution for stalking. You need to start taking your
>meds and snap out of it, dude. Complaints to for
>starters.

You DO realise, nym sifting SOCK PUPPET that there is no such thing as
Usenet Support Personnel.

PLONK!! Into my adaptive kill file for YOU!


John Kuthe...

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:25:13 -0500, John Kuthe >
wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:53:30 -0500, Usenet Support Personnel
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:27 -0600, Sqwertz's forger wrote:
>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>>>> this one be intimidating?
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> United States, Wisconsin, Madison....
>>
>>Posting somebody's address under a forged nym just because she said
>>boo to you. You really have gone off the deep end and are opening up
>>yourself to prosecution for stalking. You need to start taking your
>>meds and snap out of it, dude. Complaints to for
>>starters.
>
>You DO realise, nym sifting SOCK PUPPET that there is no such thing as
>Usenet Support Personnel.
>
>PLONK!! Into my adaptive kill file for YOU!
>
>
>John Kuthe...

Sigh. There's no helping some people.

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:52:58 PM UTC-4, Sqwertz wrote:
> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
> > this one be intimidating?
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> United States, Wisconsin, Madison
> On Oldfield Rd, yes?

No. Not even close.

Another Cindy Hamilton

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:52:58 PM UTC-4, Sqwertz wrote:
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>>> this one be intimidating?
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> United States, Wisconsin, Madison
>> On Oldfield Rd, yes?
>
> No. Not even close.
>
> Another Cindy Hamilton
>

Blattttttt!!!!!

On 9/16/2015 10:54 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:52:58 PM UTC-4, Sqwertz wrote:
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>>> this one be intimidating?
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> United States, Wisconsin, Madison
>> On Oldfield Rd, yes?
>
> No. Not even close.
>
> Another Cindy Hamilton
>

Well that was fairly creepy.

La Llorona wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > wrote:
> > > On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> > > > On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org
> > > > > because all spammers come from there but the 'whatever'
> > > > > persons are also pretending there to come from valid
> > > > > addresses.
> > > > >
> > > > > What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue
> > > > > who actually needs help.
> > > > >
> > > > > To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on,
> > > > > then go away.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including
> > > > the full headers of the post:
> > > >
> >>> ";
> > > >
> > > > It might have some effect.
> > >
> > > Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul
> > > you would not be such a loser.
> >
> > The American ideal of free speech pertains to government restriction
> > on speech.
>
> No.
>
> It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect ALL
> free speech at the ultimate firewall level.
>
> Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to endorse
> crass censorship.
>
> > It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> > that comes out of your piehole.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> No one said you had to, did they?
>
> Well?????
>
> You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all of
> my posts if you wish.
>
> But do NOT attempt to censor me.
>
> That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
>
> Capisce?

LOL! the only MASSIVE mistake is reading you.

--