Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet wrote:
> > juliebove says...But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an area with > > distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. > > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to > turn on the cooker to keep warm. You are nit picking. Simmering something on a stovetop for hours is best done on cold winter days. I like the nice smell on a cozy day indoors when it's cold out. Same with long oven cooking. Once the food is cooked, you can leave the oven door open to cool and let all the heat out. To pervent extra heat indoors during hot spells, crockpots and outdoor grills are good alternatives. I'll cook most meals the same winter or summer but there are a few things that I tend to do with the season. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Janet wrote: >> >> juliebove says...But I think it is safe to say that most people who live >> in an area with >> > distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. >> >> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the >> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >> turn on the cooker to keep warm. > > You are nit picking. Simmering something on a stovetop for hours is > best done on cold winter days. I like the nice smell on a cozy day > indoors when it's cold out. Same with long oven cooking. Once the food > is cooked, you can leave the oven door open to cool and let all the > heat out. > > To pervent extra heat indoors during hot spells, crockpots and outdoor > grills are good alternatives. > > I'll cook most meals the same winter or summer but there are a few > things that I tend to do with the season. I agree. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote:
> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to > turn on the cooker to keep warm. > > Just saying. I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews etc all year around. But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind Soup weather. The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. Salads. Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather aside. I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy Young" > wrote in message ... > On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote: > >> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the >> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >> turn on the cooker to keep warm. >> >> Just saying. > > I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews > etc all year around. > > But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind > Soup weather. > > The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups > and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. > > Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want > to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about > tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. > Salads. > > Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never > got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather > aside. > > I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm > pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do > have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. Who cares, indeed ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:28:24 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote: > >> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the >> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >> turn on the cooker to keep warm. >> >> Just saying. > >I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews >etc all year around. > >But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind >Soup weather. > >The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups >and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. > >Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want >to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about >tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. >Salads. > >Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never >got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather >aside. > >I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm >pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do >have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. > >nancy Probably a lot of the tradition behind what is cooked during summer vs. winter has to do with the foods that are available during specific seasons. Butchering and garden harvesting would have had a huge impact. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet B" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:28:24 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: > >>On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote: >> >>> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use >>> the >>> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >>> turn on the cooker to keep warm. >>> >>> Just saying. >> >>I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews >>etc all year around. >> >>But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind >>Soup weather. >> >>The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups >>and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. >> >>Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want >>to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about >>tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. >>Salads. >> >>Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never >>got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather >>aside. >> >>I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm >>pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do >>have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. >> >>nancy > > Probably a lot of the tradition behind what is cooked during summer > vs. winter has to do with the foods that are available during specific > seasons. Butchering and garden harvesting would have had a huge > impact. > Janet US As well as the amount of time a person had to do the cooking for the day. Harvest, canning, smoking, etc. all took time, but not in the winter. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet B" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:28:24 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: > >>On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote: >> >>> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use >>> the >>> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >>> turn on the cooker to keep warm. >>> >>> Just saying. >> >>I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews >>etc all year around. >> >>But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind >>Soup weather. >> >>The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups >>and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. >> >>Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want >>to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about >>tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. >>Salads. >> >>Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never >>got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather >>aside. >> >>I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm >>pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do >>have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. >> >>nancy > > Probably a lot of the tradition behind what is cooked during summer > vs. winter has to do with the foods that are available during specific > seasons. Butchering and garden harvesting would have had a huge > impact. They still have if you like fresh stuff! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet B" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:28:24 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: > >>On 9/16/2015 8:17 AM, Janet wrote: >> >>> Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use >>> the >>> cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >>> turn on the cooker to keep warm. >>> >>> Just saying. >> >>I'm not knocking people who make casseroles and soups and stews >>etc all year around. >> >>But I have no problem understanding the sentiment behind >>Soup weather. >> >>The first fall-like day, I suddenly crave pot roast. Then soups >>and baked chicken and all things long cooked or roasted. >> >>Of course I can make those things in the summer. I don't want >>to. I'm not in the mood for that kind of food. I'm all about >>tomatoes and burgers and steak on the grill once in a while. >>Salads. >> >>Perhaps I would adjust if I lived in a climate where it never >>got cold, then I imagine I'd want pot roast at some point, weather >>aside. >> >>I'm not judgy about people who make soup all year around, so I'm >>pretty sure no one needs to knock the millions of people who do >>have a change in tastes during the seasons. Who cares. >> >>nancy > > Probably a lot of the tradition behind what is cooked during summer > vs. winter has to do with the foods that are available during specific > seasons. Butchering and garden harvesting would have had a huge > impact. > Janet US Yes indeed! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 6:01:15 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > > > "Janet" > wrote in message > > .. . > > > > > > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the > > > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to > > > turn on the cooker to keep warm. > > > > > > Just saying. > > > > The cooker? What's a cooker? > > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on in the kitchen. You must have > lived a sheltered life. > > No, Ju-Ju is just stupid. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy" > wrote in message ... > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >> "Janet" > wrote in message >> .. . >> > In article >, says... >> >> >> >> > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in message: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold >> >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop >> >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. >> >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot >> >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer >> >> >> months. >> >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. >> >> >> >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an >> >> area >> >> with >> >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. >> > >> > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the >> > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >> > turn on the cooker to keep warm. >> > >> > Just saying. >> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? > > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on in > the kitchen. You must have > lived a sheltered life. > ---- GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven in it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this country called a cooker. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 12:39:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Roy" > wrote in message: > > > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on in > > the kitchen. You must have > > lived a sheltered life. > > ---- > > GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven in > it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this > country called a cooker. > > ****tard. Why you insist on making stupidity a virtue? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Roy" > wrote in message > ... > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > >> The cooker? What's a cooker? > > > > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on in > > the kitchen. You must have > > lived a sheltered life. > > ---- > > GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven in > it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this > country called a cooker. Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country isn't the entire world. I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the word has been used in that context since 1884. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the > word has been used in that context since 1884. Barbarians over there, one and all! heheh ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> >> I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the >> word has been used in that context since 1884. > > Barbarians over there, one and all! heheh ![]() *growl* -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message ... > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >> "Roy" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > >> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >> > >> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >> > in >> > the kitchen. You must have >> > lived a sheltered life. >> > ---- >> >> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >> in >> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >> country called a cooker. > > Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country > isn't the entire world. > > I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the > word has been used in that context since 1884. Quite ![]() ![]() but they are all a 'cooker' ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >>> "Roy" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >>> > >>> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >>> > in >>> > the kitchen. You must have >>> > lived a sheltered life. >>> > ---- >>> >>> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >>> in >>> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >>> country called a cooker. >> >> Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country >> isn't the entire world. >> >> I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the >> word has been used in that context since 1884. > > Quite ![]() ![]() > but they are all a 'cooker' ![]() What is a hob? I have seen that term too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message > ... > > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove > > wrote: > >>"Roy" > wrote in message > > > ... > >>> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove > wrote: > > > >>>> The cooker? What's a cooker? > > > > > >>> A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you > cook on > in >>> the kitchen. You must have > >>> lived a sheltered life. > >>> ---- > > > > > > GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has > > > an oven in it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we > > > have nothing in this country called a cooker. > > > > Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this > > country isn't the entire world. > > > > I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently > > the word has been used in that context since 1884. > > Quite ![]() ![]() > hob, but they are all a 'cooker' ![]() Hob is the one that catches me askance for a moment. -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message ... > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >> "Roy" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > >> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >> > >> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >> > in >> > the kitchen. You must have >> > lived a sheltered life. >> > ---- >> >> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >> in >> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >> country called a cooker. > > Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country > isn't the entire world. > > I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the > word has been used in that context since 1884. Okay. I do remember a woman on some show referring to a cooker. She was standing in the kitchen and I had no clue what in there was the cooker. But it is in no way a commonly used or even ever used word here! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/17/2015 7:27 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >>> "Roy" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove >>> wrote: >> >>> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >>> > >>> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook >>> on > in >>> > the kitchen. You must have >>> > lived a sheltered life. >>> > ---- >>> >>> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an >>> oven in >>> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >>> country called a cooker. >> >> Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country >> isn't the entire world. >> >> I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the >> word has been used in that context since 1884. > > Okay. I do remember a woman on some show referring to a cooker. She > was standing in the kitchen and I had no clue what in there was the > cooker. But it is in no way a commonly used or even ever used word here! Oh please. Most people can figure out what a "cooker" is. Oven, stove, it's an appliance. I don't own an Aga but I know what one is, oh so well-read person. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >>> "Roy" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >> >>>>> The cooker? What's a cooker? >>>> >>>> A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >> > in >>>> the kitchen. You must have >>>> lived a sheltered life. >>>> ---- >>> >>> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >> in >>> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >>> country called a cooker. >> >> Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country >> isn't the entire world. >> >> I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the >> word has been used in that context since 1884. > > Okay. I do remember a woman on some show referring to a cooker. She was > standing in the kitchen and I had no clue what in there was the cooker. > But it is in no way a commonly used or even ever used word here! Yet despite not being a word used here, you couldn't figure it out on your own?! -- jinx the minx |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:27:29 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message ... >> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:39:55 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: >>> "Roy" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >> >>> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >>> > >>> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >>> > in >>> > the kitchen. You must have >>> > lived a sheltered life. >>> > ---- >>> >>> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >>> in >>> it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in this >>> country called a cooker. >> >> Contrary to popular belief, Usenet is international, and this country >> isn't the entire world. >> >> I've seen Brits refer to "cookers" before, here on RFC. Apparently the >> word has been used in that context since 1884. > >Okay. I do remember a woman on some show referring to a cooker. She was >standing in the kitchen and I had no clue what in there was the cooker. But >it is in no way a commonly used or even ever used word here! Please do not include me in your group of people who do not know and cannot figure it out. What is it you read anyway? Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, says...
> > "Roy" > wrote in message > ... > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > >> "Janet" > wrote in message > >> .. . > >> > In article >, says... > >> >> > >> >> > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > wrote in message: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold > >> >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop > >> >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. > >> >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot > >> >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer > >> >> >> months. > >> >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. > >> >> > >> >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an > >> >> area > >> >> with > >> >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. > >> > > >> > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the > >> > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to > >> > turn on the cooker to keep warm. > >> > > >> > Just saying. > >> > >> The cooker? What's a cooker? > > > > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on in > > the kitchen. You must have > > lived a sheltered life. > > ---- > > GB? What's GB? Great Britain, moron. Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet" > wrote in message .. . > In article >, says... >> >> "Roy" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Janet" > wrote in message >> >> .. . >> >> > In article >, >> >> > says... >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in message: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold >> >> >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop >> >> >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. >> >> >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot >> >> >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer >> >> >> >> months. >> >> >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. >> >> >> >> >> >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an >> >> >> area >> >> >> with >> >> >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. >> >> > >> >> > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use >> >> > the >> >> > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need >> >> > to >> >> > turn on the cooker to keep warm. >> >> > >> >> > Just saying. >> >> >> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >> > >> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >> > in >> > the kitchen. You must have >> > lived a sheltered life. >> > ---- >> >> GB? What's GB? > > Great Britain, moron. Why do you find it necessary to call names? I have never heard it referred to as that before. Not that I go around referring to it or listening to others refer to it. I do have one friend who is from England. She lives here now. Didn't like it there and doesn't much ever refer to it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:40:24 -0700, "Julie Bove" > wrote: > >"Janet" > wrote in message . .. >> In article >, says... >>> >>> "Roy" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >>> >> "Janet" > wrote in message >>> >> .. . >>> >> > In article >, >>> >> > says... >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > wrote in message >>> >> >> ... >>> >> >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove >>> >> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > wrote in message: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold >>> >> >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop >>> >> >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. >>> >> >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot >>> >> >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer >>> >> >> >> months. >>> >> >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an >>> >> >> area >>> >> >> with >>> >> >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. >>> >> > >>> >> > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use >>> >> > the >>> >> > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need >>> >> > to >>> >> > turn on the cooker to keep warm. >>> >> > >>> >> > Just saying. >>> >> >>> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? >>> > >>> > A cooker in GB is a freakin' cookstove, range or whatever you cook on >>> > in >>> > the kitchen. You must have >>> > lived a sheltered life. >>> > ---- >>> >>> GB? What's GB? >> >> Great Britain, moron. > >Why do you find it necessary to call names? I have never heard it referred >to as that before. Bullshit you haven't. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/17/2015 1:39 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven > in it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in > this country called a cooker. Great Britain. Home of the Aga stove. http://www.agamarvel.com/aga/ They sell from about $8000 to $16,000 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message news ![]() > On 9/17/2015 1:39 AM, Julie Bove wrote: >> > > >> GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven >> in it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in >> this country called a cooker. > > Great Britain. Home of the Aga stove. http://www.agamarvel.com/aga/ > > They sell from about $8000 to $16,000 Thanks. Wouldn't interest me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On 9/17/2015 1:39 AM, Julie Bove wrote: > > > > > > GB? What's GB? I have something called a stove. My stove has an oven > > in it. And no, I didn't lead a sheltered life but we have nothing in > > this country called a cooker. > > Great Britain. Home of the Aga stove. http://www.agamarvel.com/aga/ > > They sell from about $8000 to $16,000 AGA originated in Sweden Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, says...
> > "Janet" > wrote in message > .. . > > In article >, says... > >> > >> > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > wrote in message: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold > >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop > >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. > >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot > >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. > >> >> > >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer months. > >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. > >> > >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an area > >> with > >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. > > > > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the > > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to > > turn on the cooker to keep warm. > > > > Just saying. > > The cooker? What's a cooker? It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms by now? Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work it out from the context. Janet UK. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-09-17 3:33 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says... > It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. > > Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading > international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms > by now? > > Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work > it out from the context. > You are talking to a person who claimed to be a writer, claimed not to be a writer, claimed to never have said she was a writer and claimed not to remember having said she was a writer, and who, when she was still claiming to be a writer, did not know the meaning of "ignorant" and did not think it was important for a writer to know the meaning. She says she is not stupid, but her comments tell us otherwise. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-09-17 3:33 PM, Janet wrote: > > In article >, says... > > > It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. > > > > Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading > > international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms > > by now? > > > > Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work > > it out from the context. > > > > You are talking to a person who claimed to be a writer, claimed not to > be a writer, claimed to never have said she was a writer and claimed not > to remember having said she was a writer, and who, when she was still > claiming to be a writer, did not know the meaning of "ignorant" and did > not think it was important for a writer to know the meaning. > > She says she is not stupid, but her comments tell us otherwise. Oh! Oh! Now you've done it. The Anti-everything police will be down on you for criticizing Julie...evil little trolls that they are. ==== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-09-17 6:25 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2015-09-17 3:33 PM, Janet wrote: >>> In article >, says... >> >>> It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. >>> >>> Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading >>> international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms >>> by now? >>> >>> Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work >>> it out from the context. >>> >> >> You are talking to a person who claimed to be a writer, claimed not to >> be a writer, claimed to never have said she was a writer and claimed not >> to remember having said she was a writer, and who, when she was still >> claiming to be a writer, did not know the meaning of "ignorant" and did >> not think it was important for a writer to know the meaning. >> >> She says she is not stupid, but her comments tell us otherwise. > > Oh! Oh! Now you've done it. The Anti-everything police will be down on you for criticizing Julie...evil little trolls that they are. > ==== > What can I saw. People keep replying to her so I have the choice of filtering all of them or be exposed to her lies and idiocy. The thing is, she did say that she was a writer. She did say that she was not a writer. When confronted with quotes from her posts where she said she was a writer she said she did not remember saying that she was a writer. When called "ignorant" she said that she didn't know what that meant, and when it was suggested that a writer should know the meaning of a word that is common knowledge to most people, she said she didn't think that writers needed to know it. If her sycophants feel a need to defend her that can try to deny the truth of what I have written. Julie thinks that denial is a form of rebuttal, so they can try to do the same. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:05:33 -0400, Dave Smith > wrote: >On 2015-09-17 6:25 PM, Roy wrote: >> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2015-09-17 3:33 PM, Janet wrote: >>>> In article >, says... >>> >>>> It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. >>>> >>>> Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading >>>> international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms >>>> by now? >>>> >>>> Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work >>>> it out from the context. >>>> >>> >>> You are talking to a person who claimed to be a writer, claimed not to >>> be a writer, claimed to never have said she was a writer and claimed not >>> to remember having said she was a writer, and who, when she was still >>> claiming to be a writer, did not know the meaning of "ignorant" and did >>> not think it was important for a writer to know the meaning. >>> >>> She says she is not stupid, but her comments tell us otherwise. >> >> Oh! Oh! Now you've done it. The Anti-everything police will be down on >> you for criticizing Julie...evil little trolls that they are. >> ==== >> > > >What can I saw. People keep replying to her so I have the choice of >filtering all of them or be exposed to her lies and idiocy. Just because something's not in your killfile, doesn't mean you're obliged to read it. Just like I don't read the following: >The thing >is, she did say that she was a writer. She did say that she was not a >writer. When confronted with quotes from her posts where she said she >was a writer she said she did not remember saying that she was a writer. >When called "ignorant" she said that she didn't know what that meant, >and when it was suggested that a writer should know the meaning of a >word that is common knowledge to most people, she said she didn't think >that writers needed to know it. > >If her sycophants feel a need to defend her that can try to deny the >truth of what I have written. Julie thinks that denial is a form of >rebuttal, so they can try to do the same. -- Bruce ============================ 'Dave' feels Usenet should be run in exactly the way he prefers ie not allowing others of whom he disapproves to post at all. He is like a small child having tantrums because he is not getting his own way. Most unattractive in a grown man! He is obviously incapable of *not* reading something in front of him. --- http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2015-09-17 3:33 PM, Janet wrote: >> In article >, says... > >> It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. >> >> Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading >> international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms >> by now? >> >> Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work >> it out from the context. >> > > You are talking to a person who claimed to be a writer, claimed not to be > a writer, claimed to never have said she was a writer and claimed not to > remember having said she was a writer, and who, when she was still > claiming to be a writer, did not know the meaning of "ignorant" and did > not think it was important for a writer to know the meaning. > > She says she is not stupid, but her comments tell us otherwise. What I had published was in relationship to Astrology and also some poetry. I did win a contest for my Haiku about Baklava. But other than that, not much that I wrote had anything to do with cooking or cookery or whatever you want to call it. Yes, I wrote things in the past and yes I was published. I have been writing Haiku again too. No, I will not post it here. I am writing stuff for fun. Not to get published. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet" > wrote in message .. . > In article >, says... >> >> "Janet" > wrote in message >> .. . >> > In article >, says... >> >> >> >> > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:00:55 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in message: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I don't understand when people say cool/cold >> >> >> > weather is 'soup weather.' People don't stop >> >> >> > eating meatloaf when it's a warm weather season. >> >> >> > Nor do they forego spaghetti, or chicken pot >> >> >> > pie, or a dozen other dishes that are eaten hot. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes they do! I tend to eat stuff like salad during the summer >> >> >> months. >> >> >> Certainly not stuff that is made in the oven. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Trying to speak for everyone else again, I see. >> >> >> >> No. But I think it is safe to say that most people who live in an >> >> area >> >> with >> >> distinct seasons, do vary what they eat. >> > >> > Most here seem to live in a home which is designed so they can use the >> > cooker in summer without discomfort; and in winter, they don't need to >> > turn on the cooker to keep warm. >> > >> > Just saying. >> >> The cooker? What's a cooker? > > It's a kitchen stove, Julie. A cooker is what real cooks cook on. > > Surely a " published writer ", who has spent years reading > international cookery groups, should have picked up a few common terms > by now? That is not a common term here and neither is cookery. > > Failing which, since you say you're "not stupid", you could just work > it out from the context. Nobody in this country says they are using the cooker or doing cookery. To me, the words sound comical. Might be common there but certainly not here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/17/2015 6:36 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> Nobody in this country says they are using the cooker or doing cookery. > To me, the words sound comical. Might be common there but certainly not > here. After all this time on usenet how can you, Julie, fail to grasp the international flavors here? I've learned all kinds of new words and have read about all kinds of cooking methods that "aren't common here" (here being where I live: the US) and have had very little difficulty sussing out their meaning. Same thing for novels written by non-US authors. Just kick those brain cells into gear. -- DreadfulBitch I'm not a complete idiot. Some parts are missing. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message ... > On 9/17/2015 6:36 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > >> Nobody in this country says they are using the cooker or doing cookery. >> To me, the words sound comical. Might be common there but certainly not >> here. > > After all this time on usenet how can you, Julie, fail to grasp the > international flavors here? I've learned all kinds of new words and have > read about all kinds of cooking methods that "aren't common here" > (here being where I live: the US) and have had very little difficulty > sussing out their meaning. Same thing for novels written by non-US > authors. Just kick those brain cells into gear. I rarely ever read novels. And while there are people from other countries here, I don't always read their posts or have an interest in what they are cooking. Just because you know and do some things doesn't mean that I do. Like Jill, you and I seem to have nothing at all in common. Nothing. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/17/2015 8:51 PM, DreadfulBitch wrote:
> On 9/17/2015 6:36 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > >> Nobody in this country says they are using the cooker or doing cookery. >> To me, the words sound comical. Might be common there but certainly not >> here. > > After all this time on usenet how can you, Julie, fail to grasp the > international flavors here? I've learned all kinds of new words and > have read about all kinds of cooking methods that "aren't common here" > (here being where I live: the US) and have had very little difficulty > sussing out their meaning. Same thing for novels written by non-US > authors. Just kick those brain cells into gear. > It seems as if Bothell is covered by a giant bubble. Hey, you used the word 'sussing' and I understood exactly what you meant. ![]() Jill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Still Soup Weather Here | General Cooking | |||
soup weather | General Cooking | |||
Soup Weather. | Diabetic | |||
Soup Weather | General Cooking | |||
Soup weather | General Cooking |